Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California elected officials' pay to be cut 18%
LA Times ^ | 05/20/09 | Patrick McGreevy and Ann Simmons

Posted on 05/20/2009 1:27:21 PM PDT by freespirited

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: freespirited
"How do you find $21 billion in one year?"

Didn't have any trouble finding it when you wanted to spend it.

41 posted on 05/20/2009 2:31:07 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47

How much do you think they should be paid in salary?

Today the number is $116,000 per year (less 18% for newcomers)?

How do you expect to attract competent legislators? Who would want the job.

Note that there are more than 5,000 prison guards in California making more than $100K.


42 posted on 05/20/2009 2:32:08 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

They work overime.


43 posted on 05/20/2009 2:33:12 PM PDT by nufsed (Release the birth certificate, school and passport records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: paul51
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2254594/posts?page=25#25

Number 19 and 21.

44 posted on 05/20/2009 2:37:01 PM PDT by nufsed (Release the birth certificate, school and passport records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
How do you expect to attract competent legislators? Who would want the job.

Same old argument. We can't attract 'good' people unless we pay them more. They are overcompensated as it it is. Why are the willing to spend so much to get the job if it isn't worth it? Better to have people more interested in public service than how much they can soak the system for. Make the compensation $1. I doubt there will be any shortage of qualified applicants.

45 posted on 05/20/2009 2:38:34 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: nufsed
So, how much should a legislator get paid?

According to state law, their salary is supposed to be set based on three factors:
1) How much time is required to perform official duties, functions, and services
2) The annual salary and benefits for other elected and appointed officials in California with similar responsibilities, including judicial and private-sector officials and
3) The responsibility and scope of authority of the state official.

Also, consider this: In June 2008, I looked up CA government salaries on the database hosted by the SacBee. There were almost 1600 state employees making in excess of $200,000 per year (that is salary only, excluding perks, OT, etc.) There were too many to count if I extended the threshold down to $100,000. When Schwarzenegger took office, only 8 employees made more than $200,000 per year (according to the SF Chron)

Beware of the balance of power here. This appears to me to be a power grab from the Executive Branch whose employees are paid far more than legislators. If they dumb down the legislators enough, they will have unlimited power. Is that the way you want to go?

46 posted on 05/20/2009 2:42:14 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: paul51
They are overcompensated as it it is.

Compared to what?

How much do you think they should be paid?

47 posted on 05/20/2009 2:43:18 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Now that’s what we’re talking about, go California.


48 posted on 05/20/2009 2:45:47 PM PDT by annieokie (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
I don't care much what they get paid. Cut them the same as you cut state employees. See my previous budget plan to save over 20 billion a year.

They should be fined if they don't pass the budget on time.

I want to see a one-house legislature with a two-year budget cycle. The legislature should meet every other year for four months. Stop a lot of the nonsense. 1 six year term.

49 posted on 05/20/2009 2:48:31 PM PDT by nufsed (Release the birth certificate, school and passport records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Nothing more than a small jesture affecting about 125 people that will vote themselves more per deim, travel allowance, etc.

Fire (NO LAY OFFS) 50,000 state employees would be doing something more effective.


50 posted on 05/20/2009 2:52:08 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nufsed
I don't care much what they get paid. Cut them the same as you cut state employees.

But therein lies the problem. They AREN'T cutting state employees. They are giving them raises.

Why be a legislator if you can be an environmental analyst and make 30% more?

I want to be represented in the legislature by someone competent, not the bottom of the barrel ego-monger. Drop the salaries below competitive wages and you'll get the latter, while leaving legislators more susceptible to corruption and ceding their responsibilities to an overbearing executive branch and lobbyists.

51 posted on 05/20/2009 2:54:06 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: henkster

“the idea being that an official in political disfavor cannot be hounded out of office by impoverishment’”

SOUNDS LIKE A TERIFFIC PLAN TO ME!


52 posted on 05/20/2009 2:56:15 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Compared to what? How much do you think they should be paid?

Compared to the results they get. I already said what I thought they should be paid. $1.

53 posted on 05/20/2009 2:59:44 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
The commission had wanted to decrease current officials' pay, but the panel's attorney said California law does not allow that.

The Proposed initiative list can begin.

Item 1. Repeal the Law passed in 1972, Proposition 6, approved by the voters (I wonder how trhey 'sold' that one?), which prohibits the reduction of elected state officials' salaries during their term in office. (comment: it may not however, prohibit the freezing of their salaries for their entire term).

In keeping with fairness and equity, why should state employees, elected or otherwise, get a paycheck for not doing their job?
Private industry doesn't.

54 posted on 05/20/2009 3:03:22 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Change is not a plan; Hope is not a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Now this is more like it!!! This is progress!!!


55 posted on 05/20/2009 3:03:54 PM PDT by Maelstorm (Those that have nothing to hide welcome debate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paul51
I already said what I thought they should be paid. $1.

Sounds like you are opposed to representative government then.

It can't effectively exist under your option.

56 posted on 05/20/2009 3:04:55 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Travis T. OJustice
Let me get this straight. An 18% pay cut that doesn’t really affect anyone? LOL!

Well, if you live in California, and voted in 1972, you voter for exactly that, you idjit!

57 posted on 05/20/2009 3:05:20 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Change is not a plan; Hope is not a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
As long as you base compensation on what someone else is getting, you will have a self perpetuating spiral upwards. That is why the system is designed that way. So bureaucrats can justify ever increasing ridiculous levels of compensation. They've rigged the system. Once we get back to compensating people based on what they contribute, we will begin to see some sanity.
58 posted on 05/20/2009 3:06:26 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
In keeping with fairness and equity, why should state employees, elected or otherwise, get a paycheck for not doing their job? Private industry doesn't.

If they aren't doing their job, there is a remedy: they can be recalled.

This is a power play to weaken ONE branch of government. It stinks.

59 posted on 05/20/2009 3:06:27 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
This was not employees, this was officials..

You drank the kool-aid, I see.
"Officials" are no less employees than the capitol janitor (although the delusional losers think otherwise)!

60 posted on 05/20/2009 3:06:55 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Change is not a plan; Hope is not a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson