Posted on 05/12/2009 8:17:58 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
You are a pro at projecting. Your last two comments directed at me were projecting.
You never did answer my question. Would you have any problem if your daughters(s) or granddaughter(s) posed nude?
Yes, I am standing up with Carrie Prejean in opposing gay marriage. And I have not seen what you are referring to (?????).
See post #55
Same here. But conservatives need to start picking better role models.
I could roll with this model in the hay!
I agree- she IS stunning! She’ll start a wave of cool people having the courage to stand-up and oppose gay marriage.
Well then, Mr. Levin and Putz Hilton have a lot more in common than I thought!
I KNEW that Hilton was a c#%k sucker, but I thought that Levin only did that because he was an attorney and not because he enjoyed it.
Live and learn ...
She is a good role model. She is schooling to be a special education teacher..... and will probably get some Hollywood movie deals as well.
Her issue is a victory for Conservatism and a slam on the Libs.
What’s with the dark line that’s almost always at her throat in that series of pictures?
It's nothing, just a small scar from the surgery to remove her Adam's apple!
3. In other words I think you're fos.
1. I don't care whether Trump kept her on or not. Trump should have prescreen these ladies much better to start. The Rhode Island woman for instance. At one time the Miss State and Miss USA pagent particpipants stood for woman of character. Now they appear they are nothing but sex tards.
2. Yes, I do. I'm hardcore anti gay. I can't stand their agenda. I also can't stand RINO's would proclaim they are conservatives but embrace this woman with loose morals.
3.And you are a typical hypocritical rino who is destroying the conservative movement. Do as I say not as I do.
You never answered my question about your daughters posing topless so I guess you don't see anything wrong with it.
LMAO. How low in standards we have become. Yeah my teachers in grade school and HS posed topless. Not!!
I've read that before, and others like it. It states that homosexual conduct occors in nature, therefor it's natural and the logical conclusion that they wish you to draw is if it's "natural" then it's normal. Bollocks. Blindness, spina bifida and even mania or emotional distress occur in the mammalian population naturally. But, that hardly means that animals (including humans) that suffer from those disorders are "normal".
If you look at the reasons that the AMA, or the WHO (Incidentally, the WHO actually passed a "resolution" to reclassify homosexuality - Who bases science on a policy vote?), changed their positions on homosexuality, they're political reasons, not scientific ones. The reasoning behind re-classifying homosexual behavior from a disorder to an acceptable sexual variance was based on nothing more than political pressure.
Moreover, while there has been research to find the "cause" of homosexual predisposition or behavior, many of the findings or conclusions have been pilloried by the homosexual lobby, in much the same way as Miss Prejean was attacked.
As an example, there has been some tremendous research done about hormonal imbalances found in some pregnant women that may result in changes to neurological development of babies in utero. It is theorized that if you could test for these imbalance, it may one day be able to predict with some accuracy a child's homosexual tendencies. If you could identify a genetic or hormonal "trigger", then you could then begin to formulate or design a "fix" or prevent it from developing in the first place. This is the part the homosexual lobby objects to, as they believe that there's nothing to fix.
Look at where this scientific political correctness has brought us to today. Recently, we had news stories about a "man" who gave birth to a baby. An 8th grader knows that it's biologically impossible for a man to give birth. Because of the pressure of political correctness, psychiatrists today enable people that believe they're "born into the wrong" body - enable them to make profound physical changes to their bodies, all based on the premise that it's "natural" and normal. And surgeons indulge this disordered thinking by helping the victims to mutilate their bodies - what ever happened to the medical credo, "First do no harm"?
Just like we shouldn't base science on religion and certainly shouldn't allow religion to creep into the science classroom in any way, science shouldn't buckle to political correctness, which is exactly what it's done with respect to the homosexual phenomenon the last 40 years.
gee, I wonder who added that keyword...
You are wrong again-see my response dayted May 6th. I have been consistent about this woman A conservative role model does not pose topless. You are the one that is not what you claim to be. You are a RINO.
I STAND WITH CARRIE PREJEAN.... Wednesday, May 06, 2009 10:55:35 AM · 13 of 74 tc45a to Hildy On Fox this morning the runner up said the reason they were wanting to strip her of her crown was not what she said during the pageant but she is going to church groups,civic groups representing herself as “Miss California” speaking about her stance-in effect representing the Miss California pageant The runner up said that goes against her contract she signed as Miss Ca. i.e. not to get political meeting with any group. She is allowed to speak at these groups about anything she wishes but is not allowed to go as Miss california. Yes, pretty sad this is even an issue. Hypocritcal of gay groups. They ask her stance on gay marriage during the pageant but “don’t dare speak about gay marriage as Miss California to a group”. Gays are the most hypocritical and intolerant people of anyone. Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies
Nice projecting again rino.
You are why I left the republican party and became a independent. Rino hypocrits like you.
If this woman came out for gay marriage you would be calling her a slut and every name in the book for her pics. People like you give ammunition to the left.
Let's just part ways. We will never agree. I'll keep my conservativism and you can keep your rinoism.
Thank you for your courteous reply. I should leave well alone but even may be off topic. Perhaps Freepers without young daughters may not be aware of a world out there. I was totally in the dark myself. My young daughter was considered attractive and many more are. Out she goes into this world.
In our city of 76,000 is the one "reputable" agency, run by a woman who has impeccable credentials. My take on it was that these hundred or so young women locally were buying a dream. An impossible dream. The word "folio" was used. To be frank it was like buying a lottery ticket. At 300-500 bucks a folio it is nice money . I suffered a little and hoped that it would blow over. Fortunately none of it was improper. Referrals were made to a Toronto agency etc.
As far as I am concerned there was not a hope in Hades for any big deal for any of these girls. What I am trying to say is that the opportunity for someone unscrupulous is nearly unlimited. The lead off for these creeps is to decry prudery and say "are you suggesting that there is something wrong with the human body?"
I know you will agree that simply to try to ruin a young person in any career, because they were pressured into these photographs. I do not have the support of my liberal spouse whose life career was in Special Education. This on Carrie following that noble career
I cannot think why- a little chuckle here. Please excuse this screed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.