If PELOSI KNEW then ,certainly,many DEM LEADERS KNEW
You should at least check Breaking News before posting.
This isn’t news. Pelosi never expected the media to do its job and she thought she could continue lying about her ignorance. She is such a hypocrite.
They are covering for her. I am so shocked.
Crossing my fingers that more of the truth comes out. I noticed how the emphasis on the lawyers went from prosecution to disciplinary action like disbarment or suspension. I believe that was an attempt to keep info like this from getting out.
Rush pointed out that they are still attempting to at least destroy the careers of the advisers. I pray that there are some patriots left who won’t sit idly by while people who dedicated themselves to our protection are strung up by the left.
Pelosi lied and Americans might die because of her lies.
Has anyone thought about starting up a new reporting service so we can break the media’s lying to the US? Christian Broadcast News (CBN) would have been just the thing but don’t know if their service is really broadcasting the truth or not...
Hum .. yet she wanted prosecutions ...
Well let them begin then.
I think democrats have a hell of a lot more to lose than the republicans.
So she was for it before she was against it. Shocker.
“Misstater,” “misstater,” skirt on fire!
Liar, liar, pantsuit on fire.
I have to say I’m encouraged the vast majority of comments in the WaPo are anti-Pelosi, though some comically go so far as lumping her and 0bama in with that “war criminal” Bush.
Security Before Politics
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/24/AR2009042403339.html
By Porter J. Goss
Saturday, April 25, 2009
-—snip-—
Today, I am slack-jawed to read that members claim to have not understood that the techniques on which they were briefed were to actually be employed; or that specific techniques such as “waterboarding” were never mentioned. It must be hard for most Americans of common sense to imagine how a member of Congress can forget being told about the interrogations of Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed. In that case, though, perhaps it is not amnesia but political expedience.
Let me be clear. It is my recollection that:
— The chairs and the ranking minority members of the House and Senate intelligence committees, known as the Gang of Four, were briefed that the CIA was holding and interrogating high-value terrorists.
— We understood what the CIA was doing.
— We gave the CIA our bipartisan support.
— We gave the CIA funding to carry out its activities.
— On a bipartisan basis, we asked if the CIA needed more support from Congress to carry out its mission against al-Qaeda.
I do not recall a single objection from my colleagues. They did not vote to stop authorizing CIA funding. And for those who now reveal filed “memorandums for the record” suggesting concern, real concern should have been expressed immediately — to the committee chairs, the briefers, the House speaker or minority leader, the CIA director or the president’s national security adviser — and not quietly filed away in case the day came when the political winds shifted. And shifted they have.
Circuses are not new in Washington, and I can see preparations
-—snip-—
The writer, a Republican, was director of the CIA from September 2004 to May 2006 and was chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence from 1997 to 2004.
*******
This was published by the Washington Post but buried in a Saturday paper.
I do not recall one Sunday morning show mentioning this article.
She got all that plastic surgury so she could lie STRAIGHT-FACED!
Of course she did! Another Democrat saying whatever it will take to get elected whether it’s true or untrue.
