Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California ponders changes in constitution (Liberals want to perform surgery on the CA constitution)
http://www.breitbart.com ^ | By BETH FOUHY | Apr 23 07:22

Posted on 04/24/2009 8:07:56 AM PDT by Maelstorm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Maelstorm

The particular surgery in mind is abortion.


21 posted on 04/24/2009 9:40:37 AM PDT by Trod Upon (Obama: Making the Carter malaise look good. Misery Index in 3...2...1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

Retool the document to make government function more smoothly,that sounds like an obama plan.


22 posted on 04/24/2009 9:55:27 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Yes - PLASTIC surgury!


23 posted on 04/24/2009 10:27:39 AM PDT by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Arnold’s props on the May ballot will be very close on defeat or passage. 1f is about the only one I will vote for. The others look like traps for short term gains, though Arnold and the Dems deny it but I cannot see how these people do not understand that more spending to gain tax advantages, so they say, can help us out with increased deficits and more taxes over all, will occur because Ca. is such a Dem dominated state.


24 posted on 04/24/2009 12:14:19 PM PDT by phillyfanatic ( iT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phillyfanatic
I'm opposed to 1F. It would take away financial independence from conservative lawmakers to resist spending and taxation proposals. If their paycheck is going to be cut off by an arbitrary deadline, they have no incentive to resist bad budgets. Its a terrible idea.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

25 posted on 04/24/2009 12:26:27 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop; phillyfanatic
I'm opposed to 1F. It would take away financial independence from conservative lawmakers to resist spending and taxation proposals. If their paycheck is going to be cut off by an arbitrary deadline, they have no incentive to resist bad budgets. Its a terrible idea.

BUMP. Well said.

It actually acts as a postive incentive to pass a bad budget.

26 posted on 04/24/2009 12:33:10 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado! - NO on Props 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

The democRATs in Louisiana did this often in the 70’s. Look where it got them.


27 posted on 04/24/2009 1:34:08 PM PDT by lormand ("Janet Napolitano should resign or be fired." - Congressman John Carter - My Congresscritter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

The only reasonable tax we have now is our property tax. If they were allowed to screw with that, it would likely triple. (Like Texas’)


28 posted on 04/24/2009 2:48:33 PM PDT by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
Oh yea, lets let Arnold and the Democratic controlled legislators change the State Constitution. Then we can be like Cuba, why not, we are starting to look a lot like Cuba.

Forgive me, I'm a self loathing former Republican that voted for this fool Arnold, it's all my fault. Someone spank me please!

29 posted on 04/24/2009 6:46:13 PM PDT by c21sac (Live,Love & eat sushi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

But if they did hold one,would that open up the prospect for breaking the state into smaller states?Let the conservative areas secede and the liberal areas socialize themselves into economic oblivion.


30 posted on 04/24/2009 8:35:38 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gorilla_warrior
Partition California. Except for the city of San Diego and south to the Mexican border, the People’s State of California will comprise the area from the seacoast to a line 20 miles inland from the seacoast.

How stupid is that?...Give up the best damn realestate, and just hand it over to them?

Tell ya what, why not give them most of Riverside and San Berdo, and we take the coastal region?

31 posted on 04/24/2009 8:43:07 PM PDT by dragnet2 (When seconds count, the police are only minutes away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

You know, I wanted to vote NO on all of these, but as a Chamber member I was trying for consensus. I think I will go with you and just vote NO and let the Dems and Arnold struggle with it some more!


32 posted on 04/25/2009 11:51:34 AM PDT by phillyfanatic ( iT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

I would rather live in the desert and be free than live in the best real estate and be a slave.


33 posted on 04/27/2009 2:48:42 PM PDT by gorilla_warrior (Liberalism is a hate crime that can no longer be tolerated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson