Posted on 04/16/2009 9:24:50 AM PDT by Bob J
Good post.
The coverage of the Tea Parties is exemplary of the hardcore Marxist ideology of the Media. It's easy to see when you see who the editors and owners of these corporations are, far Left radical, America-hating Communists. They despise the system and country that provides them creature comforts they could never imagine in any other nation on earth, yet they still hate it.
We need to pool our money and buy some of these dying Liberal platforms (TV, radio, print) and get a foothold back into the media.
Olbermann grates me to the point I want to vomit, so does Matthews, Maddow, Couric, Williams, Charlie Rose...the Lefty list goes on and on...
I would suggest a war against the MSM. And it is very simple since Reagan was so effective with it in the 80’s.
You bankrupt them. You go after their advertisers, you file lawsuits against their bias and you force them out of the closet. Not only against the MSM, but against other leftwing causes.
By forcing them to spend money they would use to further their agenda, you take away a very powerful tool. Eventually, even a George Soros and others will realize that their money is being tossed in the toilet and will stop funding these groups.
We were the 3rd story on the tv local news here in the SF Bay Area. They covered the local, and also had a screen split into four showing parties in four other states. I felt the coverage was decent.
Nice post!
Generally local news is a little fairer than the MSM. Chalk this up to the “occasional win”.
But let me ask you a question, taking how the entire media, local and national, treated the event, how would you rate it on a scale of 1-10 with 10 being honest and 1 being dishonest?
I believe a nongovernmental organization should be set up to “rate” news organizations and personalities. This organization would be setup in a similar way to the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) is for rating movies. If a news program/network/reporter wants to be registered as unbiased this organization would apply standards to qualify. A news organization could have both registered unbiased reporters and pundits(biased), but would have to apply a graphic that identifies each as they speak/report/preach.
The only way for the media to move in this direction would be if people were to start protesting the media. Chants of “bias” and “join the (what ever name this organization becomes)” should be in the background of every on-site broadcast. News organizations should be picketed. Everyone being interviewed should first ask “are you a member of ____.”
I believe this would renew integrity in journalism while maintaining the free speech rights of everyone.
Nice post BobJ. But I can’t help but think that Obamaby, Hilliary and the like ARE my enemies, as well as the media. they are one in the same.
"It is anti-government, it is anti-CNN, it is not appropriate for family viewing..."
Expose them as outright LIARS. They are the Pravda Media and they’ve been MAKING UP news for years.
Agree. The left is a a comglomeration of small cults and the media is the bull horn for some great omnipotent leader or cause which they mindlessly rally to. If we attack Obama mindlessly like the talk radio blabbermouths then the media rallies the cult to the “great leader’s” defense and we accomplish very little. It is the cultists who need to be singled out for criticism and ostracism not the “great leader.”
Agreed with your point #1, we need a scorecard/report card.
As for #2, we are way beyond protesting. Protesting the MSM is like throwing Mao’s little red book at apparatchiks.
Now you’re talking. It’s a war and calls for battle tested strategies and techniques.
The time for asking is over. Now it’s time for demanding and following up with critical action if those demands are ignored.
I appreciate the teaparties very much, but it was a given that they would be ignored by our elected officials and impugned by the MSM. We need to start forcing them to hear the people.
Absolutely dead-bang on, Bob! The lame-stream (think urine) media is another enemy. We have many. :o)
Usually, I man my post at the keyboard, finding out the real deal and the video, as appropriate, to back it up; then, I email it to all my friends and family. Some of them don’t have the time to fish for the real news. Most of them know they are getting spin, but they just don’t know how much news they’re not hearing about AT ALL.
Deception and lies die under the light of information and truth. We must all take on the responsibility of educating those around us, imho.
That’s not an unfair position, but let me throw this at you. If you target a “hillary” and even succeed in marginalizing or removing her, your effort may be in vain as there are 20 more “hillarys” lined up right behind her to take her spot.
We have to target command and control...the entities that are responsible for putting “hillarys” in positions of power to begin with. These entities are the secret army of our enemies. The operate in anonimity knowing they will never have to answer for their crimes against democracy.
“If we really wanted to wake up the world, we’d stop organizing for media attention and start organizing for impact.’
I think you’re on to something, could you define “impact”?
“Deception and lies die under the light of information and truth. We must all take on the responsibility of educating those around us, imho.”
How about we just force the media to report the news honestly and accurately? Then we don’t have to educate anyone, the media will be doing that as they should always have been.
The MSM has become cancerous and it is beyond treatment. The bad parts must be excised for there to be any hope of recovery.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.