Skip to comments.
Out of Thin Air
(renewable energy)
American Thinker ^
| April 13, 2009
| David S. Van Dyke
Posted on 04/12/2009 11:24:13 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
1
posted on
04/12/2009 11:24:14 PM PDT
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
Another aspect of Wind Energy to consider is.. that the wind is variable. To maintain a constant state of power.. other sources have to be balanced to handle the fluctuations in power to maintain a constant cycle.
Up here in the Pacific Northwest.. where a extensive grid of Damns provide 45% of the regions power.. They have to throttle back the dams when the winds increase.... To do that. they reduce the water flow of the turbines and open a few flood gates. The environmentalists hate that because they claim it kills the fish.
Wind energy provides only 7% of the electricity on the Bonneville Power Administrations grid..
Wind Energy is a neat concept.. but spoiling of views, noise in some areas.. Its Not the answer to all the energy needs of the country
2
posted on
04/12/2009 11:33:13 PM PDT
by
Kitanis
To: neverdem
Another valid point that the writer could make:
Wind energy and solar energy both need to be fully backed-up by conventional energy sources -- for those times when the wind doesn't blow or the sun doesn't shine. Each and every watt generated by a wind turbine or a solar array must be backed-up by a watt of coal- or natural gas- or nuclear-generated power.
Not exactly the model of efficiency, no?
Regarding wind generation in West Texas, the month of highest electricity consumption in the Southwest is August (air conditioners, doncha know). And when is the wind least likely to blow in West Texas?
That's right. August.
3
posted on
04/12/2009 11:37:23 PM PDT
by
okie01
(THE MAItNSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
To: neverdem

Map 2-6 Annual average wind resource estimates in the contiguous United States
http://rredc.nrel.gov
4
posted on
04/12/2009 11:51:52 PM PDT
by
smokingfrog
(How big is your God?)
To: smokingfrog
5
posted on
04/13/2009 12:09:55 AM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: neverdem
Of course all those windmills in far off windy places take lots of wire to bring the power to the user too. I’d rather see a smaller version for the individual house used.
I don’t know what the pay back time would be but at least it would tend to put the cost on the user.
6
posted on
04/13/2009 12:40:14 AM PDT
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: neverdem

Here's a pic of my Dad, BIL, and I hoisting Dad's new wind turbine on the mountains above San Diego last weekend. It took him months and lots of frustrations to get all the permits required, but in the end if he gets his rebates it should cost very little.
7
posted on
04/13/2009 12:41:39 AM PDT
by
cabojoe
To: neverdem
I really want to like photovoltaic panels, but when you run the numbers, they are just not practical, even when the govt picks up 80% of the cost in some states. I would never recoup the money I put into the system, although someone in their 20s might be able to.
8
posted on
04/13/2009 12:57:02 AM PDT
by
Kirkwood
To: smokingfrog
I just noticed something very interesting in that wind across America map. There seems to be a very good place for a wind mill farm just along the coast of Cape Cod. Has anyone looked into building one there???
9
posted on
04/13/2009 1:06:02 AM PDT
by
mtdrake
To: neverdem
I also view the large windmill ‘farms’ as a blight on the land. What’s the difference between 100 windmills and 100 billboards? Perception, that is it. Both, block natural views.
In Illinois some unlucky communities rushed to allow wind farm development. One, near Rochelle Illinois has about thirty or forty windmills which rarely can be seen turning.
I am a supporter of individual energy development, wind, solar, what have you. Where we become independent from the government and it’s utilities.
10
posted on
04/13/2009 1:06:06 AM PDT
by
Wpin
(I do not regret my admiration for W)
To: mtdrake
I just noticed something very interesting in that wind across America map. There seems to be a very good place for a wind mill farm just along the coast of Cape Cod. Has anyone looked into building one there??? ::: grin :::
11
posted on
04/13/2009 1:15:53 AM PDT
by
Talisker
(When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
To: mtdrake
Cape Wind, the mammoth and controversial 130-turbine wind-energy project off of Cape Cod, Mass. A leading foe of the $1 billion project is Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., an early and influential backer of Obamas presidential bid. A strong proponent is Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, a close friend of Obama and a source for some of his best campaign speech lines.
The plan to erect 130 giant turbines across 25 miles of federal waters in Nantucket Sound http://www.wind-watch.org/
12
posted on
04/13/2009 1:32:17 AM PDT
by
anglian
To: anglian
Thanks anglian. My remark was an attempt at sarcasm, pointing out the hypocrisy of the left on this issue.
13
posted on
04/13/2009 1:54:11 AM PDT
by
mtdrake
To: okie01
Wind energy and solar energy both need to be fully backed-up by conventional energy sources -- for those times when the wind doesn't blow or the sun doesn't shine. Each and every watt generated by a wind turbine or a solar array must be backed-up by a watt of coal- or natural gas- or nuclear-generated power.
Nuclear generated power cannot follow the instantaneous ups and downs of wind production: for that purpouse gas turbines are utilized which may explain the interest of certain groups in windmills and why the last wind lobby meeting was held in Texas. That is, wind energy is the cover up of the oil industry to step into the electricity market.
Another question when wind farms expand is the possibility of a cascade failure due to dips in the grid: when a dip occurs, the proteccions of the asynchronous generators used in windmills disconnect them to avoid damage in the rotor. Its sudden disconnection increases the dip, which triggers neighbouring protecctions. In the end, whole windfarms collapse and the entire grid may follow if there is not enough spare capacity.
Although the problem can be solved with more power electronic equipment (which increases the cost of the wind turbine), the truth is that wind is not an adequate source of power in most places.
14
posted on
04/13/2009 2:19:38 AM PDT
by
J Aguilar
(Veritas vos liberabit)
To: Wpin
The local REMC has a sub-station just outside of town. Recently they have mounted two solar panels and one small windmill.
Rumor has it that this is an experiment. The theory is that these tree items can produce enough electricity for one family home. This is an effort to see if that is true.
Further rumor is that REMC is considering this as an alternative to power transmission lines. An REMC customer could elect to have this items delivered and erected on his property and pay a monthly fee.
15
posted on
04/13/2009 2:26:39 AM PDT
by
M.K. Borders
(All I ask from my leaders is the liberty my Grandfathers were born to.)
To: neverdem
I certainly would not want a huge wind turbine (many times the size of a pump jack) blocking my view of the Sandia and Jemez mountains. Large wind farms are only effective in certain locations and if those locations happen to have nice scenery around them, you can expect tremendous resistance to them.
16
posted on
04/13/2009 3:35:44 AM PDT
by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
According to an article in the Houston paper yesterday, Texas added 2671 MW of wind power in 2008. Iowa added 1600 MW to surpass California.
To: cabojoe
Don’t worry about the cost, which for him is very little, as you say, we poor taxpayers will be happy to assure him cheap power. REBATES are , like rent subsidies, are Welfare for the well to do. If it is only profitable with subsidy, it should not be done.
barbra ann
18
posted on
04/13/2009 4:15:19 AM PDT
by
barb-tex
(The new Republic of Texas will include the states of the Confederacy.)
To: Kirkwood
If you can’t recoup your 20%, why should I opt for my 80%?
barbra ann
19
posted on
04/13/2009 4:18:30 AM PDT
by
barb-tex
(The new Republic of Texas will include the states of the Confederacy.)
To: barb-tex
He’s probably paid more taxes per year than most pay in their lives. He deserves to get something back from the taxing scoundrels.
20
posted on
04/13/2009 4:21:19 AM PDT
by
cabojoe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson