Skip to comments.
Art as Propaganda for Evolution
CEH ^
| April 10, 2009
Posted on 04/11/2009 9:21:02 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-107 next last
To: count-your-change
Not even if they have feathers? They have any? At least one of them did.
81
posted on
04/14/2009 7:51:29 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: count-your-change
I believe the correct term is proto or primitive feathers or feather-like structures. Of course collagen fibers fits even better according to comments in an article in National Geographic News about Feathered Dinosaur Was Bald, Not Bird Ancestor, Controversial Study Says.Did they have any drawings or artist's renderings?
82
posted on
04/14/2009 7:54:39 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
83
posted on
04/14/2009 8:07:00 PM PDT
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: count-your-change
Go to the site and see. Okay, I'll do that.
Did I make a mistake telling you what I knew about the Creation Museum when you asked?
84
posted on
04/14/2009 8:10:58 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: count-your-change
They have one, “collagen fibers” and all. “Deceptive propaganda”, or illustration?
85
posted on
04/14/2009 8:16:55 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
It’s O.K., I don’t think any less of you as a person and we can keep it between us (with maybe a few insomniacs).
The double post is an OOPS.
86
posted on
04/14/2009 8:21:22 PM PDT
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: count-your-change
I’ll try to do better in the future.
87
posted on
04/14/2009 8:29:39 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
Propaganda without question.
88
posted on
04/14/2009 8:29:58 PM PDT
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: count-your-change
Even though it’s clearly labeled “artist’s rendering”?
89
posted on
04/14/2009 8:31:22 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
Oh, absolutely! The rendering is just a part of the whole. NatGeo and propaganda is like grits and gravy.
90
posted on
04/14/2009 8:47:48 PM PDT
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: count-your-change
Oh, absolutely! The rendering is just a part of the whole. NatGeo and propaganda is like grits and gravy.So it's "propaganda" or "illustration" depending on who drew it.
91
posted on
04/15/2009 3:37:54 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
Let’s not jump to unwarranted conclusions. Unlike the Darwinists I don’t automatically dismiss what is said on the basis of it’s source.
But as I said before, images of any kind are always part of the whole.
92
posted on
04/15/2009 7:36:38 AM PDT
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: count-your-change
Lets not jump to unwarranted conclusions. Unlike the Darwinists I dont automatically dismiss what is said on the basis of its source.I'm trying to find something in your explanations that doesn't warrant that conclusion, but I'm not having much luck. You've said you're only interested in discussing art as propaganda for evolution, but not as propaganda for anything else.
93
posted on
04/15/2009 7:51:58 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
If you wish to discuss propaganda in general I’ll be glad to do so. My earlier comment was an attempt to stick to the article but since we’ve strayed a bit from that my objection is really invalid now.
What examples or sources of propaganda do have in mind?
94
posted on
04/15/2009 9:04:46 AM PDT
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: count-your-change
What examples or sources of propaganda do have in mind?How about the article?
95
posted on
04/15/2009 10:21:53 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
But it is unusual to be so caught up that you don’t recgonize what goes on around you. To say the least.
96
posted on
04/15/2009 1:40:09 PM PDT
by
tpanther
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
To: tpanther
But it is unusual to be so caught up that you dont recgonize what goes on around you. To say the least.I recognize "what's going on around me" well enough to know I don't care to participate in it.
97
posted on
04/15/2009 4:29:31 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
How was metmom “rude”?
You fool no one but yourself.
98
posted on
04/15/2009 5:47:19 PM PDT
by
tpanther
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
To: tpanther
She knows where to find me if she wants to talk about it. I don’t owe you any explanations.
99
posted on
04/15/2009 6:12:24 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
You made the (empty) accusation, so to to say you’re somehow above the fray is meaningless. I don’t care if you explain it or not, it is what it is.
100
posted on
04/16/2009 7:41:22 AM PDT
by
tpanther
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-107 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson