Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teen girls trading sex for favours
cnews ^ | 4/1/09 | ANDREW HANON

Posted on 04/01/2009 3:12:44 PM PDT by Nachum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: brytlea

Adult male losers who want to screw underage girls. Honestly, if these girls are going to have sex with sleazebag men, better they should get paid for it than do it for free.

I have to think the parents of these girls either know full well what their daughters are up to or just flat out don’t care — some are probably single mothers who are busy doing the exact same thing, just for less money/stuff because they’re older and not in as much demand. When your daughter has a $10 a week allowance and there’s an ever-growing mountain of designer clothes/shoes/handbags and jewelry accumulating in her room and adorning her person, that you didn’t buy for her, you know something serious is going on. Either you investigate, or you don’t.


41 posted on 04/01/2009 5:47:46 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

Cultural changes do not affect only those alive and in the country where those changes begin.

Of course the Lewinsky rippled through Canadian culture too. Of course children born after that happened are affected by that too.

Don’t sweat the folks jumping on your back on this thread. You are right.


42 posted on 04/01/2009 5:50:45 PM PDT by Petronski (For the next few years, Gethsemane will not be marginal. We will know that garden. -- Cdl. Stafford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bluecollarman; Charles Martel

Nothing wrong with the math. The articles quotes the girl saying that Dang would take them to a house where “a dozen or so men were waiting”. Ever heard of “pulling a train”? At $60 per man, it would only take about 8 men to make $500. Just under 2 minutes per man. They line up and go for it one after the other.


43 posted on 04/01/2009 5:58:10 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

Exactly - it’s a gang-bang, but organized through a pimp.


44 posted on 04/01/2009 7:23:15 PM PDT by Charles Martel ("Endeavor to persevere...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

Are you forgetting? Dang got $40 of the $60. That means she would have to do 25 men at $20 a pop in 15 min. But....there were only 12 or so men remember? And there was more than one girl.

Nah some of this is made up. It is bad enough without embellishing it.


45 posted on 04/01/2009 11:12:08 PM PDT by bluecollarman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

“That’s nine guys in fifteen minutes, just under two minutes per john. Quite a high-volume business!”

Dang got $40 of the $60. So it would be more than that. It would be 25 men 15 min. Part of this story is BS


46 posted on 04/01/2009 11:15:05 PM PDT by bluecollarman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: bluecollarman
For each man the girls had sex with, they'd be paid $60. Dang got $40.

I read that as the girl got $60 and Dang got $40. That interpretation certainly matches the girl's math a lot better. And it sounded like it was usually only one girl at a time. She said a girl would call Dang tell him she wanted to "work" and he'd pick her up and drive her to a house where a dozen or so men were waiting. Unless several girls all called Dang at the same time to announce they wanted to "work", this would mean one girl at a time, or perhaps sometimes a pair of girls who were already together when they called Dang to ask for "work".

Who knows. Obviously it would go down somewhat differently at each session, and it may be that some girls got paid a lot more than others, due to looks, age, experience, willingness to do certain things, etc.

47 posted on 04/01/2009 11:19:01 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: bluecollarman

The article isn’t very clear on that point, but I read the $60.00 / $40.00 info as the split of a $100.00 trick.


48 posted on 04/01/2009 11:23:59 PM PDT by Charles Martel ("Endeavor to persevere...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: edzo4
www.canadiansexacts.org

LOL...they put up this mock Canadian Government web site after that episode.

49 posted on 04/02/2009 3:02:09 AM PDT by TankerKC (Revenge and Envy--the new Principles of Freerepublic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC

that’s funny as hell, all the links are a THICKE roll, kind of like a rickroll, but they lead to alan thicke


50 posted on 04/02/2009 5:45:38 AM PDT by edzo4 (NoBama 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: bluecollarman

Maybe she got tips?


51 posted on 04/11/2009 7:05:50 AM PDT by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson