Posted on 03/23/2009 3:51:11 PM PDT by holymoly
/sarcasm
BTW You can leave a comment for little Ruthie at the website, should you be so inclined. (No log in required.)
Go ahead Ruthie. Try to confiscate my guns under your ruse of “gun control.”
Doofie Kelly is just that....
stupid subject.
—Then those of us who are pro-gun control won’t feel so creeped out we have to go buy an Uzi to defend ourselves from you.
The only truthful part of her article. Gun controllers are afraid of guns. Period.
What do you expect from a college newspaper in California? The most annoying part is that taxpayers are paying for this bilge. Wait til she enters the real world, where journalism degrees go begging, the local paper is up for sale, and women’s studies get you a job as a restroom attendant in Tijuana.
Two words for Ruthie:
Molon Labe.
Ruthie Kelly is a journalism and women’s studies senior. This pretty much says all you need to know about her.
Ruthie Kelly is a journalism and women’s studies senior.
IOW “I’m an idiot”
LOL! Try looking around Washington DC.
look at the recent SCOTUS case concerning that fine district's laws.
Anything originating from something with the word “Aztec” in it sets off all my bells and whistles. No worth putting in the shredder, but I’d burn it just for the carbon.
Another dumb@ss liberal wasting tax money.
“journalism and women’s studies senior’
She better practice saying “want to supersize that?”
A pity she didn't opt for a college education.
The biggest among her several false premises is that anything short of confiscation ought to be acceptable. Surprise, Ruthie - the answer is no.
people who major in journalism or women’s studies (let alone both) shouldn’t get govt financial aid.
Let me attack Ruthie's paternalistic screed from the perspective of leftist wymen:
If Ruthie gets her way, thousands of wymen will die because of their inability to get their hands on a means of protection against violent male predators... Many of them would be black wymen. That must be Ruthie's goal. Therefore Ruthie must be a racist.
See, leftist "logic" is fun...
I wonder how this soon-to-be-telemarketer would feel if we asked for the same requirements to vote? "It's just an application and an ID check to make sure you're not a fraudulent voter."
And let's be serious, what are you supposed to do with a degree in Journalism and Women's Studies?
With Guns, we are Citizens, Without Guns, WE ARE SUBJECTS!
Hey Ruthie: Way to go outing yourself as a victim-in-waiting! Imagine the irony of some police pathologist having to pry the keyboard from your cold, dead hands because you made it clear to every rapist, murderer, or God knows what in California that you will be unarmed and therefore unlikely to be able to defend yourself. Genius. You know, you’re more likely to die under a gang member with a crowbar than by being shot by little old law-abiding, gun-owning me. But I guess that’s how phobias work.
“But requiring you to wait a few days, fill out some paperwork and know how to put the safety on before you’re allowed to buy a weapon of slaughter,”
How about a knife, Ruthie? How about a car? An axe?
“Slaughter” Ruthie, is an act that anyone can do with almost anything. But “slaughter” has nothing to do with perserving ones life and saftey and Freedom, Ruthie, which means you have demonstrated your bias against the 2nd amendment in your attempt to demonstrate your intellectual reason in this matter. Nice try, Ruthie....
It’s not banning guns that is the problem. I don’t think they will ever do that. But they can put high taxes on guns and ammo, making it nearly impossible to afford. It will have the same effect.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.