Posted on 03/16/2009 10:08:22 AM PDT by pissant
The conversation took place. However, she never said she was present at Obama's birth, as is plain from the full transcript posted further up on the thread. She very clearly indicated that he was born in Hawaii, and that she was present in Kenya.
Of course, you would not know that from reading Berg's version transcript because he cuts it off just before the conversation gets to the point where she explains herself fully.
Regardless of the affidavit of one of the participants, you spew your nonsense.
You mean the affidavit that McRae admits was fraudulantly signed?
you spew your nonsense.
I believe my own ears before I believe an affidavit signed under a false name.
McCrae filed a false affidavit? Who knew? he might want to retract it.
No, some guy claiming to be the translator in the conversation filed his affidavit (the very same one you pasted above) under a false name, as McCrae has admitted. An affidavit filed under a false name is fraudulant by definition.
Who said it was fraudulent? McCrae? Link please.
McRae's affidavit, page 5, paragraph 2:
"Accordingly, on Thursday, October 16 2008 Reverend Kweli Shuhudia (actual name temporarily withheld to protect his life), an evangelists (sic) with our ministries throughout Africa traveled to Kogello and located Ms. Sarah Obama at her home...
So your "smoking gun" not only turns out to be heavily edited, removing the parts where Sarah Obama repeatedly denies that Obama was born in Kenya, it's also supported by one affidavit that the other supporting affidavit tells us is fraudulently signed.
McRae admits Kweli Shuhudia is not the real name of the man who filed the affidavit:
Accordingly, on Thursday, October 16, 2008 Reverend Kweli Shuhudia (actual name temporarily withheld to protect his life), an evangelist with our ministries traveled to Kogello and located Ms. Sarah Obama at her home, see the attached email attached as Exhibit “4″.
From here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2140233/posts
An affidavit filed under a false name is fraudulant.
Spanky, you think John Doe’s can’t have affadavits? LOL. Got pound sand.
No, it is not necessarily so. Only for Obama pole smokers it is.
As a matter of fact, they can't.
There is good reason why testimony from anonymous witnesses is not admissible.
Google “affadavit john doe”. There are scads of em.
You’re out of your league here, spanky.
No, I don't.
Good, then you’ve established yourself as an official Obama troll chick.
I always thought CA a tough bar exam.
Any one who pokes holes in your balloon is a troll guy.
Those who go to actual law schools apparently don't have any more problem with the California bar as their compatriots do with the bar exam in the other states. Pass rates for first time testers runs between two-thirds and three-quarters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.