Posted on 03/05/2009 9:39:12 AM PST by Zakeet
Maybe Limbaugh Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Durbin, Murtha Should Be Executed Tried For Treason
.
Obama and his rats are anti-American!
My how times change!
“Lib Talker: ‘Maybe Limbaugh Should Be Executed For Treason’”
Either this Socialist is pathetically ignorant or programmed with commiethink.
thanks, i wasn’t sure which woman she was
Two turds in the punch bowl!
Just as the MSM is asking each GOP Congressman and Senator whether he or she wants Obama to fail, what the MSM shouid also be asking each Democratic counterpart is do you favor executing Rush Limbaugh for treason?
What makes Stephanie Miller any different from Rush Limbaugh?
the difference? Rush has never asked for someone to be executed.
So. Now, for disagreeing with the Obamafuerher, we should be executed for treason? Who is he that we must extend a straight arm and parrot “Sig Heil”!?
Μολὼν λάβε
She's so hateful wanting a human being executed! (I wonder what her stance on capital punishment is. Bet she's a hypocrit.) Not even Rush wanted any harm to come to Obama, just lack of success in his destroying America.
Miller's comments are the real story here. What a talentless, hateful femanazi.
and she wonders why her late-night TV gig lasted about as long as cherry blossoms on the mall
“liberal talk radio host” (Stephanie Miller)
Didn’t know any of that breed was still around.
The Republican keeps trying to talk about issues like tax increases during a recession, and the ways that the huge sstimulus package is being spent... and the liberal just keeps talking about Rush. Amazing the lengths they will go to, to avoid being substantive.
>> What makes Stephanie Miller any different from Rush Limbaugh?
Are you saying that Miller represents the Democrat Party?
Maybe Obama should be impeached and deported!
Yes, loving your Country and wanting the best for it makes you a traitor according to a lefty.
The thread is misconceived.
Read her remark. She was cobbling up an off-the-wall hypothetical as an attention-getting gimmick, and opposing that to substantive discussion.
Her comment was of the form, "well if I said THIS, and it's just irresponsible, still I'd get attention -- and so what, is that good, bad, or indifferent?"
She was on her way to making some other point about the quality of discourse in a quibble over personalities, but the transcript is bobbed at that point.
She was, of course, shooting her own side in the foot, since it's the Administration and their Rottweilers that have been pushing this pillow-fight with Rush as a tactical distraction from the discussion over the quality of Administration thinking about How to Fix Things.
You're making Obama's tactics good by fascinating on "who needs to be executed" and "who's a traitor?"
The real discussion is, Obama's an ideological drone, his people don't know how to think about economic problems, and they're making things worse.
This liberal chick is illustrating perfectly why this change-the-subject-by-throwing-some-red-meat-out-there tactic works like a charm with passionate people.
The real subject is, Obama's a seminar dork, not Rush is a traitor or someone else is a traitor. The subject is, Obama and his people are screwing the economy to the wall.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.