Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Did This Happen? (The economic mess)
American Thinker ^ | March 01, 2009 | Randall Hoven

Posted on 03/01/2009 12:55:40 AM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 03/01/2009 12:55:40 AM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I thought this video had a fairly good (perhaps too simple) explanation of why. But yeah - some pure Capitalism might be nice for a change.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RZVw3no2A4&annotation_id=annotation_918789&feature=iv


2 posted on 03/01/2009 1:07:24 AM PST by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

very good


3 posted on 03/01/2009 1:08:08 AM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"There is a limit to even Barney Frank's ability to do evil."

False.

4 posted on 03/01/2009 1:24:08 AM PST by ChicagahAl (Don't blame me. I voted for Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Tomorrow.


5 posted on 03/01/2009 1:40:10 AM PST by FFranco (To be stupid, and selfish, and to have good health are the three requirements for happiness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
this thinking is in line with a theory I have about the 3 root causes of poverty

1. government control/oppression

2. lack of production

3. lack of resources

I believe the present crisis is caused by the first two. which also happen to be symptoms of socialism

6 posted on 03/01/2009 1:54:18 AM PST by KTM rider (keep thy powder dry, gird thy loins, and brace for the winds of change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
While he reaches the right conclusion (let's try capitalism) how he arrives there (we have a lot of socialism so let's try something else) isn't particularly convincing. If this is the best opponents of socialism are going to be able to do, then we're unlikely to make much headway convincing the average guy to vote our way.

Fortunately, it really isn't that tough to understand what happened and why it wasn't capitalism, but governmental intrusions into the free market, that brought about the mess.

Meltdown does a great job of explaining what happened and why, as well as how to fix it so that it doesn't happen again.

7 posted on 03/01/2009 2:23:11 AM PST by Swing_Thought (Become a free market capitalist. Accept no substitutes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

People confused debt with equity and this confusion was global.


8 posted on 03/01/2009 2:36:26 AM PST by Proud_USA_Republican (Trust unto God and He shall direct your path)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
A couple small corrections needed here.

AIG is in trouble mainly because it wrote insurance policies on mortgage derivatives and mortgage securities. In good times, that's like minting your own money. In bad times, well, no need to explain that.

Q4 GDP for America was revised down from minus 3.8% to minus 6.2%. The annualized rates in Japan, Germany, France, England, and Italy are all worse than the USA.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have a combined loss of $1 trillion. Their losses come almost exclusively from actual mortgages, not from derivatives. Fannie and Freddie hold about two thirds of all bad USA mortgages.

Although home prices nationally have fallen in the 5%-10% range, the prices on sub-prime homes that have gone into foreclosure have fallen in the 20%-30% range. Between 2004-2007, about 25% of all new mortgages were sub-prime, so that is a very big deal.

The author does make one very good point.

How did all this happen?

I read about this crisis in detail, every day, and I still don't understand it.

It seems to me if the US Treasury had stepped forward early in the crisis and promised to purchase every bad mortgage at face value, the crisis would have ended instantly.

If the mortgage is guaranteed, there can be no insurance loss, and there can be no confusion about the value of the derivatives.

The total loss would have been in the range of $1.5 trillion.

In retrospect, $1.5 trillion would have been a bargain.

9 posted on 03/01/2009 2:49:34 AM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Oversight (adversarial oversight) is a verb, not a noun.


10 posted on 03/01/2009 3:11:17 AM PST by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jamaksin

Oversee is a verb. Oversight is a noun.


11 posted on 03/01/2009 3:14:22 AM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; All

12 posted on 03/01/2009 3:33:48 AM PST by musicman (Until I see a REAL C.O.L.B. BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
On a personal level, here's what happened to me: thank God I had the fortitude two years ago to tell a mortgage broker to shove his offer of a $270K mortgage approval on a second home up his tail pipe. My wife was furious with me, but I kept shaking my head, saying "I don't care if we've been 'approved'. Where the Hell is the money going to come from?" Also, people in my age brackett have no business gambling (investing) their life savings no matter how sweet the deal. The name of the game was "House Flipping." Buy a second home (investment). Hold for a few months. Sell for quick profit. Well, we all know what happened to that bubble, don't we? Predatory lending? No. Human greed. Mine. Despite being assailed by family and friends for not taking advantage, striking when the opportunity presented itself, I managed to tell the greedy side of me to sit down and shaddup. I'm certainly no financial genius. And, when it comes to being frugal, well let's just say my house is a leper colony, and I'm the one with the most fingers. It's simply that the arrangement didn't pass the smell test with me. So...I drive a 12-year old Ford Escort with 118K miles on it. Runs like a Swiss watch. We can still pay our bills, put food on the table, and keep a roof over our heads. So far, so good. Now, will somebody please explain why I have to foot the bill for the other guy's severe lapse in judgment?
13 posted on 03/01/2009 4:16:24 AM PST by PowderMonkey (Will Work for Ammo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KTM rider

4. over spending by congress


14 posted on 03/01/2009 4:20:54 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ChicagahAl

ummm... don’t you mean, Bawney Fwank?


15 posted on 03/01/2009 5:06:14 AM PST by opaque soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
It is a lie to act like what we had been trying up to now is laissez-faire capitalism or a free market. If deficit spending stimulated an economy, President Bush stimulated our economy his last seven years straight. If regulation fixed things, the 80,000 or so pages of regulations already on the books (30 times more than the middle of the New Deal), including Sarbanes-Oxley, should have worked. If increased government spending, especially on education and health care helped, Bush helped a lot more than his predecessor.

W gets nailed, just as he should.

16 posted on 03/01/2009 5:19:56 AM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

I agree for the most part - $1.5 trillion does look like a bargain now.

What happened is that these mortgages were “sold” repeatedly - worthless mortgages, made oftentimes to people who had no realistic chance of repaying these loans, but nobody cared as everyone was making money on the deals. Then the music stopped and the game of musical chairs came to an end. Whoever was left holding the bag became liable for the debt.

The only rational I can come up with (besides total corruption, greed or worse) is that the industry as a whole thought that if there were massive defaults, it wouldn’t matter, as the housing prices would continue to increase and they would still have the value of the “assets”.


17 posted on 03/01/2009 5:46:24 AM PST by khnyny ("The demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The cause of the economic crisis has been traced to MSNBC’s.....Rachel MadCow.


18 posted on 03/01/2009 5:51:46 AM PST by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

You mean like forcing banks to make loans to people who never could have paid them back. And $4 a gal. gas. Then when people started saying “Drill, Drill Now” the internal polls must have looked real bad. So by Sept. 18 the Money Lenders Pulled their money out of the US to help the Election of their Mo-si-a!


19 posted on 03/01/2009 6:22:10 AM PST by jacob allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PowderMonkey
"Now, will somebody please explain why I have to foot the bill for the other guy's severe lapse in judgment?"

Just being a straight, White male is good enough reason.

20 posted on 03/01/2009 6:33:58 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson