Posted on 02/19/2009 9:16:25 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
ping!
Thanks for the ping!
Because man is their god, even if they won’t come right out and say it. Just ask Feuerbach.
It seems to me there is no inherent difference between science and religion - If you want to see God's miracles, just look around you. The miracles exist no matter the process. JMO.
They claim to be “intelligent” and are even more close-minded then the most entrenched cultist. How does Earth’s natural history tell us anything about what is beyond the universe? I would much sooner listen to what an atheistic physicist has to say.
So basically they are worshiping Darwin. Great way to be free from religion you bunch of geniuses.
If they said “honor Darwin” than that would be a very different matter.
LOL!
Also they vent all of their anger at Christians. Don’t Jews share the Old Testament? And what of Muslims?
In the end, if you believe in God as creator, you believe in “creationism” (not giving any argument to “young earth” or any of the rest of those variant beliefs, just stating that either God created the universe or else God sprang forth from the same random event and must’ve been surprised by the whole shebang or God doesn’t exist).
Quite simply, the Temple of Darwin is a cult. But now that the evidence is forcing the Evos to abandon the HMS Beagle, they are now (frantically) searching for a new God-denying evolutionary ship. Indeed, just the other day, I read an article in the New York Times (of all places!) titled something like “Darwin must die, so evolution can live.” It was full of flowery praise for Darwin, but make no mistake, all those flowers were meant for Darwin’s funderal.
And yet, somehow, they say that Darwin has made it possible for them to become “intellectually fulfilled” atheists. Go figure.
ROTFLMAO. 'Highly politicized' only because it exposed ID as creationism is a pseudo-scientific wrapper.
They want freedom from religion.
I’d like freedom from hip hop but I’m not about to insist that all who disagree be forcibly silenced.
Uhh, hate to break it to you guys, but you do believe in a religion, whether you know it or not.
As a creationist myself, I’m here to tell you ID and Creation Science are not synonymous. Creation Science starts with the Bible, ID simply looks for evidence of design in nature without any headstart from the same. Indeed, Uncommon Descent just banned a famous creation scientist (Jonathan Safarti) for essentially being a creationist. Both sides are, however, united in exposing Darwood’s fanciful creation myth (not to mention all the Evos who are being forced by the evidence to abandon the HMS Beagle in search of a new God-denying evolutionary ship).
Yes, we do. As does the Temple of Darwin.
With all due respect, creation scientist is a contradiction in terms. IMHO, of course.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.