Posted on 02/18/2009 7:53:04 AM PST by Starman417
Clearly you are unable to think. The video proves the resistance and that is not murder, sir or ma’am.
I don’t lack debate skills when it comes to visiting with folks that are able to comprehend reality. Only those living in paranoid delusion think this is anything like the USSR.
Durned civilians believing they have a right to travel freely in public
I'm speaking in terms of California law and giving the cop the benefit of the doubt he thought he had a taser in his hand and not his gun. As I posted earlier, I find that a bit hard to believe too.
In law, what you think and what you can prove are two very different things. California has certain elements for a murder conviction, in this case you would have to prove the cop knew he had a gun in his hand not the taser, again, benefit of doubt.
Good reply!
Ignorant reply!
:)
No kidding.
Only those who would welcome the tactics of the USSR are not paranoid in therir delusional love of a "utopia"
Only those living in paranoid delusion think this is anything like the USSR.
Only those who would welcome the tactics of the USSR are not paranoid in their delusional love of a "utopia"
Digitized frame by frame analysis
Even digitized video uses frames
and cause disturbances on trains, and breach the peace of terrified law abiding citizens, and obstruct a peace officer...
I couldn’t care less about such details. The fact is the suspect was not a lethal threat to the officers when he was shot. Nothing more needs to be asked.
The difference is that police apprehend people and are officers of the law, and receive specialized training (though it didn’t help in this instance!). They generally have certain powers and duties my buddies and me do not. Their benefit of the doubt level is different than mine. It certainly is different in court testimony. Unless I have proof what I say happened, they will believe the officer. (It’s also why I have a recorder on me all the time.)
It is more plausible (not excuseable or approvable) to believe that a police officer accidentally shot someone while apprehending him, than it would be if ‘me and my buddies’ were doing the same thing, as I have far less reason to be doing that kind of thing as a non-law enforcement person.
I didn’t see you in the video. Were you there to speak to the man first and determine what you claim to be the situation? If not, then your authority-hating stance is the typical anarchist junk that got the guy killed.
I say we give the cop a bonus.
I do not hate "authority", but I do hate blatant abuse of authority, which this video clearly shows. Murdering a compliant subject is not proper use of 'authority'.
And yeah, i have worked in LEO roles in the past.
I say we give the cop a bonus.
That's not only STUPID, that's absolutely disgisting. I can't believe anyone whoo is ignorant enough to write something so stupid is also able to remember breathe.
You should lose your FR posting privileges for your posts on this thread. Sick, sick, sick!
He was ZERO threat, restrained, and compliant.
I’m not a cop, but I do have an IQ high enough to spell “who” instead of “whoo”.
You are on the wrong site to think that the folks here are going to side with a guy that fights the cops and dies trying. We support law-abiding citizens and there would have been no incident, if the guy would have cooperated.
Oh, you’re a cop fluffer.
Maybe if you had some LEO experience, you’d understand how idiotic your comments are.
Ah, typo police, the perfect way to spot someone who lacks debate ability.
Sounds like you'd rather live on your knees than die on your feet fighting like a man for your own freedom from this type of police abuse.
“You are on the wrong site to think that the folks here are going to side with a guy that fights the cops and dies trying. We support law-abiding citizens and there would have been no incident, if the guy would have cooperated.”
I don’t think so, sweetheart. We don’t support tyranny and the shooting of persons not posing a lethal threat. You might, we don’t.
“I’m not a cop, but I do have an IQ high enough to spell “who” instead of “whoo”.”
Do you have the brains to know a typo when you see one?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.