Posted on 02/16/2009 6:48:40 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
I agree with Moonman. Do people here think that there is some magic fairy that sets up sewage and water treatment plants? It's got to be paid somehow. Why shouldn't someone who overtaxes the facilities pay more. That said it would be easier to meter the water rather than the sewage, and that would probably save more water anyway.
Not really - the suggestion that people shouldn't flush their toilets really isn't what this charge is aimed at trying to limit - twenty five minute showers, filling your entire washing machine to wash a pair of underwear, etc - that's what they are trying to address. Yes, some misers might go to extremes, but that's not what it's about.
Didnt a bunch of you get killed recently by wildfires that spread largely because of intrusive Leftist restrictions on clearing woodland fire hazards?
Failure to adequately clear firebreaks and fuel from bush areas probably helped make the fires worse in some cases, but the 115 degree temperatures and 80mph winds had a pretty big impact as well.
I'm a volunteer firefighter - I know bushfire well. Proper land management is important, and some people probably died because it hadn't been done properly - but much of it was beyond any human ability to ameliorate.
The only way to mitigate the sewer cost ascribed to water use is to add a separate approved water meter for outside use like lawn sprinklers or outside faucets for pool filling, etc. Here in the Pittsburgh region, our idiot sewer authority (ALCOSAN) recently signed a $3 billion Consent Agreement with the EPA to clean up their river discharge.
This is the equivalent in today's dollars to asking 300,000 homes and apartments to pay for building 1.3 new Hoover Dams! The end result is that our residential sewer charges will increase ultimately to well over $1,000 per year.
Many other Eastern cities are now under similar consent decrees and will ultimately face similar costs.
I got active at one point and put up a Web site to alert the public to the cost issues at Alcosan's $3 billion Settlement:Issues and Cost to You. However, there were only a couple of homeowners at the public meeting and ALCOSAN would not even discuss the impact cost of their EPA Consent Agreement on their own residential homeowners!!
I probably didn’t make my objection clear. Of course we pay for a commodity based on usage. But giving the Gov’t the right to assess punitive levels of taxation based on usage, all in the interests of the common good, is like giving Government the right to tax caloric intake, carbon release, sugar consumption, etc. It’s a leftist’s dream. Control behavior through punitive taxes and fill Government coffers at the same time, all while politicians are taking credit for being so “good.”
Thanks for the heads up. I live in Westmoreland County and have little doubt that they will attempt, at some point in the future, the same brand of idiocy here.
And they will use their little kid whine to get it passed: “Waaa, waaa, Australia gets to tax their toilet flushes. Why can’t we???”
There are several well proven land management practices such as controlled burns, creating firestops, thinning of underbrush and over mature forests that can easily obviate most injury and loss of human life due to wildfires, regardless of the environment.
Also, an important issue is whether these dangerous conditions were in place when the homes were built, or were they allowed or forced to develop because of lack of oversight or the passage of wrongheaded environmental statutes.
I keep telling you all.
More people mean less freedom.
Had we ended LEGAL immigration in the 1960s, we’d have half as many people today, and twice as much water to go around.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.