Posted on 02/12/2009 5:27:01 PM PST by Kaslin
Nope. Unless you're in some African or central American sh*thole, revolt is just the end result of a prior decay. It is never something to be desired for its own sake.
The only reason "revolt" would be an option, would be if the moral foundations of the nation had already crumbled. Hansen suggests we may be reaching that point -- it's not a happy thought.
You really think these people would have done these things if they had really known where it all ended? Certainly a few, very greedy and competent, knew about it and took the money and ran. Most just thought it was good business and went along. These were already compensated well and if they were as smart as they thought they were would have scaled it back to avoid what evolved.
As for legalities, I guess the deficiencies in our legal code provide the basis for the distinction between ‘illegal’ and ‘wrong’. i.e., if it was not illegal it should have been. What these people engaged in is embodied in the term ‘constructive fraud’, incompetence so egregious as to be fraudulent not withstanding the intent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.