Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tiny Ocean Plants Offer Biochemical Enigma (for Darwinists)
ICR ^ | February 11, 2009 | Brian Thomas, M.S.

Posted on 02/11/2009 8:36:55 AM PST by GodGunsGuts

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 next last
To: Toddsterpatriot

microbes to man- higher info- you figure it out


121 posted on 02/12/2009 12:58:59 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: CottShop
microbes to man- higher info- you figure it out

Man has more info than microbes?

So microbes can only get new info from man (or other "higher" animals) but man can't get new info from microbes?

122 posted on 02/12/2009 1:02:21 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Protectionists, still bad at math.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

nope- keep guessing


123 posted on 02/12/2009 1:38:41 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

enough already- Chemicals had nothign higher from which to gain metainfo from- even microbes had no higher species from which to gain their metainfo from- Metainfo does not arise naturally- Can’t arise naturally, nor can it draw that info from nature- Since hte only way to draw info is via higher speices above thel ower species, and since htere was none to draw from, the whole process breaks down right from the start.

You’ll have to look up the htread Hahaha and I are discussing for more on this-

There was nothign higher from which to draw in the mythical process of abiogensis and biogenisis.


124 posted on 02/12/2009 1:43:19 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: CottShop
Since hte only way to draw info is via higher speices above thel ower species,

The only way to "draw info" is from higher species? You can't get new info from a virus?

I think a virus is probably a lower species than you....

125 posted on 02/12/2009 1:51:34 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Protectionists, still bad at math.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Why would an omnipotent, and omniscient Creator that plans things, and can whip up a species out of nothing at anytime, need a backup system?

Well why wouldn't He? Why couldn't He?

Why do people put air-bags in cars for safety?

126 posted on 02/12/2009 2:38:49 PM PST by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

No and you especially can’t get the maount of info that would have been absolutely essential had macroeovlution happened- We’re talking mind boggling info, and mysteriously, we have no examples of species evolving info additions today- but it ‘must have happened’ ‘sometime in the past’? A virus can’t add info to chemical arrangements- sorry


127 posted on 02/12/2009 5:40:46 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: CottShop
The only way to "draw info" is from higher species? You can't get new info from a virus?

No and

And?

you especially can’t get the maount of info that would have been absolutely essential had macroeovlution happened

You couldn't get a little info?

A virus can’t add info to chemical arrangements-

What chemical arrangements?

128 posted on 02/12/2009 6:18:36 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Protectionists, still bad at math.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

[[What chemical arrangements?]]

Abiogensis


129 posted on 02/12/2009 6:19:42 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

Changing the subject after your initial error, figures.


130 posted on 02/12/2009 6:45:08 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Protectionists, still bad at math.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

lol- Yeah- sayingf chemical arrangements and abiogensis is ‘changing the subject’ and apaprently in your mind = error- whatever- You do know what abiogensis is don’t you? Yup- chemical arrangements - supposed life from non life- there’s nothign htere for viruses to work on (and by hte way, where did these viruses come from? Chemicals themselves? A virus can not live on it’s own, so where di they come from? Oh yeah- that’s right, I ‘changed the subject’ woopsie. Still talkign chemical evolutio nhere Todd- pay attention.


131 posted on 02/12/2009 6:58:41 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: CottShop
lol- Yeah- sayingf chemical arrangements and abiogensis is ‘changing the subject’

When you're talking about transfer between species that already exist, yeah.

132 posted on 02/12/2009 7:01:05 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Protectionists, still bad at math.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

But that’s the whole point- Nothign existed, and supposedly, lightening sparked a bunch of precisely aligned chemicals and created chemical arangements (Somehow managing to do what nature simply can NOT do- creating PURE chemicals), and htere simpyl was no ‘life’ above this supposed creation, nor beside it nor below it- it was supposedly the beginning of all life- a bunch of aligned chemicals- then these chemicals somehow managed to do what nature is incapable of once again, and make hte leap to protiens, and to create info that was controlled by something- we’re not told what, as this new ‘protolife’ was direct, protect, repair etc, then another heirarchal leap happened, then naother, and finally, another great miracle happened and metainfo was somehow spontainiously created out of nothing to control, protect, direct, manipulate, and cosntruct all the lower info that somehow was protected directed manipulated etc, by some unknown force since it couldn’t exist in the lower ‘life’ forms.

Any more questions?


133 posted on 02/12/2009 8:51:55 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: CottShop
Any more questions?

Once you've changed the subject, why would I bother?

134 posted on 02/12/2009 9:31:16 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Protectionists, still bad at math.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
I heard sin leads to spelling errors.

Grows hair on the back of the hand as well, or so I've heard, and a dimming of the wit.

135 posted on 02/12/2009 9:45:45 PM PST by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Yes, one does wonder why would you bother when the discussion goes deeper- Incase you’re itnerested, and wish to contribute- This has all been discussed in depth in the thread titled ‘life’s irreducible complexities’ here on FR- it’s all one big related subject- knock yourself out- there’s plenty of material to comb through and digest there


136 posted on 02/12/2009 10:45:18 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

here’s a link to a similar discussion about life’s irreducible structures: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2172630/posts - I have to go back quite a ways to find hte other one though


137 posted on 02/12/2009 11:01:34 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: CottShop
Yes, one does wonder why would you bother

Yes, when you've claimed that you can only pick up new information from "species above", why would I bother?

138 posted on 02/13/2009 5:49:19 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Protectionists, still bad at math.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: CottShop
The creation model predicts that more backup systems like these will be discovered.

Since Gigi is afraid to answer, maybe you could? The creation model? What's that? Where is it? Link?

139 posted on 02/13/2009 5:50:27 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Protectionists, still bad at math.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

[[Yes, when you’ve claimed that you can only pick up new information from “species above”, why would I bother?]]

you wouldn’t bother because it was a trick quesiton- there were nospecies ‘above’ below, beside or behind


140 posted on 02/13/2009 9:13:49 AM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson