Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Huckabee: Stimulus is 'Anti-Religious'
Politico ^ | 2/10/2009

Posted on 02/10/2009 4:35:28 PM PST by AfterManyASummer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: DaveyB

Christianity must be brought down to make way for the mooselimbs.


21 posted on 02/10/2009 5:30:31 PM PST by Neoliberalnot ((Hallmarks of Liberalism: Ingratitude and Envy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

God will only help us if we stand for ourselves. I can’t believe some of the posters bad-mouthing Huckabee when Hussein is in the WH.


22 posted on 02/10/2009 5:32:32 PM PST by Neoliberalnot ((Hallmarks of Liberalism: Ingratitude and Envy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AfterManyASummer

23 posted on 02/10/2009 5:41:05 PM PST by CodeToad (Liberalism is Communism, and both are a mental disorder. Grow up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: DaveyB

And not a thing about it is to stimulate the economy!


25 posted on 02/10/2009 5:55:01 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AfterManyASummer

“banning higher education funds in the bill from being used on a “school or department of divinity.” “You would think the ACLU drafted this bill,”’

99 out of 100 who called their reps were against the so-called economic stimulus. Most of the Dems and three Republicans just spit on the voters, and we MUST remember this in the elections.


26 posted on 02/10/2009 6:10:58 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AfterManyASummer

Just what we need, funding for American madrassas. Or did Huck want to exclude certain religions from the porkulus package? If so, what exactly would be the legal basis for doing that?


27 posted on 02/10/2009 7:28:56 PM PST by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AfterManyASummer

This is probably #99 on list of reasons not to support this piece of ‘legislation’.

Does Huck want them to use the money for building mosques?


28 posted on 02/10/2009 11:07:50 PM PST by CowboyJay (Stop picking on Porkulus. He's not fat, he's just big-boned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChad

Just what we need, funding for American madrassas. Or did Huck want to exclude certain religions from the porkulus package? If so, what exactly would be the legal basis for doing that?””

How bout the Judeo-Christian heritage of our nation? These were the founders of the country and the makers of the constitution. I don’t know about “legal basis” anymore. Legal basis often means what can be done to put money in the pockets of lawyers and judges while stomping on the legislative branch of government and the concept of majority rule.


29 posted on 02/11/2009 6:40:33 AM PST by Neoliberalnot ((Hallmarks of Liberalism: Ingratitude and Envy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
How bout the Judeo-Christian heritage of our nation?

You want for a new improved version of the American government to pick which religions are "good," and therefore deserving of state funding. Sounds almost exactly like a theocracy, with your religion in charge and other religions twisting in the wind, screw the establishment clause. Not in this country, pal, not yet and I hope never.

I don’t know about “legal basis”

And apparently you don't care about it, or you would have responded to my request for a "legal basis" with something that sounded like, you know, a legal basis.

30 posted on 02/11/2009 6:27:26 PM PST by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TChad

I am not calling for the establishment of religion but freedom of religion.

I don’t get into the legal basis business since it is becoming increasing difficult to decipher some twisted sense of what the law is or means. Just because it is the law, has nothing to do with it being right or wrong. I will go with what is right, not the legal basis which is often interpreted to pad the pockets of shysters.


31 posted on 02/12/2009 6:38:48 AM PST by Neoliberalnot ((Hallmarks of Liberalism: Ingratitude and Envy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson