Posted on 02/04/2009 4:32:41 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia
Exactly...and when he says, “I’m nervous” we should all be afraid...be very afraid.
“For a screw up as bad as a terrorist attack on a U. S. city, he will blame talk radio and conservatives.”
NO he won’t, he’ll lie just EXACTLY like Clinton lied when we were attacked during his administration. You haven’t heard this? OF course you have, but it was “hidden” in the investigation, i.e. they LIED.
Wolfowitz Bombshell: Saddam Behind 9/11 Attacks and OKC Bombing
Sunday, June 1, 2003 4:01 p.m. EDT
Assistant Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, said by some to be the architect of America’s war on Iraq, reportedly suspects that Saddam Hussein played a significant role in the three worst terrorist attacks ever on the U.S. - the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing and the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
Gaffney Believes Saddam Has Already Struck on U.S. Soil
Wes Vernon, NewsMax.com
Friday, Dec. 13, 2002
WASHINGTON “ A former Pentagon official says there is strong circumstantial evidence that Saddam Hussein was behind terrorist acts right here in the United States.
“I’m frankly stupefied that we haven’t seen a more rigorous effort made to look at some of that evidence, whether it’s about the first World Trade Center attack … whether it’s about the Oklahoma City bombing … or whether it’s 9/11,” said Frank Gaffney, president and CEO of the Center for Security Policy. “I think there’s more there than has met the eye so far.”
Jayna Davis: OKC and WTC Bombers Met in Philippines
Thursday, May 27, 2004
Newsmax.com
Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols met with World Trade Center bomber Ramzi Yousef in the Philippines before he and Timothy McVeigh carried out their plot, investigative reporter Jayna Davis said Wednesday
http://www.jaynadavis.com/nm.html
Her book, “The Third Terrorist” was an excellent read. Very thoroughly researched and well-presented case and summarily dismissed by the MSM. Surprise, surprise.
Yeah, but what does he know?
They only kept another attack from happening for 7 years.
Obama is the first “black” President!
And Oprah says he is “the one”.
This country is in for a MASSIVE reality check in so many ways, it’s just a matter of time.
Shame on America for no longer knowing the difference, or caring!
I love that man...
You are the man, Bender!
“IMHO, we need to seriously look at completely overhauling the nominating process to reflect modern realities and huge changes in technology and communications from when the system was instituted.
For one thing, only registered Republicans should be able to vote in ANY state’s primary. This won’t completely prevent abuse, but it will help. Another good idea might be a National Primary Day, so states beyond Iowa and NH get a say in the process before money dictates an inevitable conclusion, a la Mccain.”
VERY GOOD idea!!! Also, all LEGAL US Citizens should be required to show PICTURE/thumbprint ID. The vote would be registered at once. Also should present proof of address to determine if they actually vote at that poll. I think the Iraqi idea of purple ink on a thumb is an EXCELLENT way to prevent illegal voting.
“IMHO, we need to seriously look at completely overhauling the nominating process to reflect modern realities and huge changes in technology and communications from when the system was instituted.
For one thing, only registered Republicans should be able to vote in ANY state’s primary. This won’t completely prevent abuse, but it will help. Another good idea might be a National Primary Day, so states beyond Iowa and NH get a say in the process before money dictates an inevitable conclusion, a la Mccain.”
VERY GOOD idea!!! Also, all LEGAL US Citizens should be required to show PICTURE/thumbprint ID. The vote would be registered at once. Also should present proof of address to determine if they actually vote at that poll. I think the Iraqi idea of purple ink on a thumb is an EXCELLENT way to prevent illegal voting.
” A “National Primary Day” sounds good but I’ll bet the libs would want it to be a “paid holiday.”***”
I believe it is law that people have two hours time to vote, with no loss of pay. It it still true? People don’t need a whold day to take off to vote (at least in my own book).
I honestly don’t know what the “law” is. I always voted before work or on my way home. Knowing the libs, they would demand that voters get the whole day off (with pay) so they wouldn’t be “disenfranchised.” Oh, and of course keep the polls open 2 hours past closing because the poor dears couldn’t make it to the polls before they closed because they were clogging up the lines at he welfare office. Can you tell how disusted I am? (Not with you! :) )
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.