Posted on 02/03/2009 2:32:55 PM PST by Jack Black
"That any Act by the Congress of the United States, Executive Order of the President of the United States of America or Judicial Order by the Judicatories of the United States of America which assumes a power not delegated to the government of United States of America by the Constitution for the United States of America and which serves to diminish the liberty of the any of the several States or their citizens shall constitute a nullification of the Constitution for the United States of America by the government of the United States of America."
So, all the states working together established a constitution and a government to act as the agent of the governed for the benefit of the governed, and these numbnuts say that the government by its acts can nullify the constitution the states established to form the government.
I say the government cant do that and that if it tries the States should get together and convince the government of the error of its ways.
And my statement above is not entirely correct because the problem is not the government, but the people in control of the government who misuse the government.
I wish ALL the States would support this!
Freedom ping.
This is the correct approach, although the concerns and wording may vary from state to state. The States have to state their case.
It doesn't get a whole lot clearer than that."
Try this:
"...all powers previously delegated to the Federal Government of the United States of America by the Constitution for the United States shall revert to the several States individually.
That's a lot clearer.
Bump and PING!
WOW!!!!
"The principle for which we contended is bound to reassert itself, though it may be at another time, and in another form." -- Jefferson Davis
The Godless Stimulus: Bans Religious Practice
in Stimulus-Renovated College and University Buildings
cultureandmediainstitute.org | February 3, 2009 | Jeff Poor
Posted on 02/03/2009 2:39:14 PM PST by Rufus2007
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2177715/posts
The Senate Carves $90 Million Out of Stimulus For Liberal Activist Group
Redstate.com | February 2, 2009 | Erick Erickson
Posted on 02/03/2009 5:23:54 AM PST by cc2k
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2177333/posts
ACORN Gets $2,000,000 from Bailed Out Bank of America
businessandmedia.org | February 3, 2009 | Jeff Poor
Posted on 02/03/2009 7:40:56 AM PST by Rufus2007
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2177401/posts
Who’s next? I think big US government and corruption has finally reached the breaking point.
This is amazing!
I hope to God this actually goes somewhere.
States Rights ping!
ping
It's worth remembering that in 1801, when Jefferson became president, the US national debt was around $100 million, about 10 times annual federal revenues. This was literally "the cost of freedom," and would correspond today to a national debt around $30 trillion. Since our actual national debt is $13+ trillion, the government is in better financial shape today than it was in Jefferson's time. And at the time, Jefferson's number one priority was paying down the national debt. So, how did he do it? How does ANY wise government ever increase its revenues? Yes, that's right! JEFFERSON REDUCED GOVERNMENT SPENDING AND CUT TAXES.-- BroJoeK
ditto, no mandatory service!
And Hawaii. But it's not as cool as Texas.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.