Skip to comments.
Will Obama Revive the Fairness Doctrine?
National Review Online/ The Corner ^
| January 23, 2009
| Michael G. Franc
Posted on 01/23/2009 4:36:56 PM PST by Delacon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
1
posted on
01/23/2009 4:36:58 PM PST
by
Delacon
To: neverdem
2
posted on
01/23/2009 4:41:46 PM PST
by
Delacon
("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
To: Delacon
“the one” will have to find ways to silence his detractors. He’s a control freak.
To: Delacon
There is no doubt in my mind they would bring it back, its in liberals nature, they want to silence everything that isn’t a liberals point of view
To: Delacon
He and the Democrat Congress may go for the Fairness Doctrine but more likely to be successful and likely to be tried is a "community content" thing reqưiring radio stations to have their programming subject to veto by a group of "local citizens" that will be almost always leftist activists or at least mushy folks who don't like to hear anything negative about things or people that run things. Conservatives have jobs and don't normally have time for such things.
5
posted on
01/23/2009 4:46:57 PM PST
by
arthurus
( H.L. Mencken said, "Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods.")
To: Delacon
I would think pretty soon since zer0 commented today that you can’t let Rush stall the $825 billion bailout bill.
6
posted on
01/23/2009 4:49:12 PM PST
by
Joiseydude
(Obama: "Putting my ideas into effect are more important than your safety from terrorist acts")
To: anniegetyourgun
the one will have to find ways to silence his detractorsHOLDER: Senator, that's a toughie. I've not given an awful lot of thought to. If I could perhaps submit an answer to you in writing,
They will have to get something in place that will also cover the Internet before they start the criminal trials of the Bush Administration. Don't want to have people conflicted in their thinking, you know.
7
posted on
01/23/2009 4:52:35 PM PST
by
JimSEA
To: Delacon
Here’s where we can only hope the U.S. Supreme Court has the cojones to uphold the first amendment — and the broadcasters forced to drop Rush have the cojones to sue.
8
posted on
01/23/2009 4:53:17 PM PST
by
malkee
(Actually I'm an ex-smoker--two and a half years-- But I think about it every day.)
To: KingGlamis; Gator_that_eats_Dems; redstates4ever; jmaroneps37
I thought you might be interested in this. I don’t think there is a fairness doctrine ping list on the FR master ping list. There should be one since there is a real chance that any fairness doctrine policy might touch the internet and Free Republic. If there isn’t one out there already and one of the old war horses on FR doesn’t want to do it, freepmail me and I’ll start one. We need one now more than ever.
9
posted on
01/23/2009 4:59:45 PM PST
by
Delacon
("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
To: Delacon
Obama has said that he would have been five points ahead if Fox News did not exist. Of course he is going to want to revive the “fairness” doctrine.
10
posted on
01/23/2009 5:03:29 PM PST
by
Jeff Gordon
("An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile hoping it will eat him last." Churchill)
To: Jeff Gordon
There goes am radio down the tube also
11
posted on
01/23/2009 5:06:48 PM PST
by
mel
(Obama- show me the BC)
To: Delacon
He could've given those non-answers at the hearing! Waiting didn't do anything to clarify his response.
What a perfect little bureaucrat. He'll get the position since he's so good at answering something with nothing.
To: Delacon; All
Two Points
1. Holder=Snake
2. If "Fairness Doctrine" goes forward how will MSNBC be affected?
13
posted on
01/23/2009 5:07:11 PM PST
by
truthguy
(Good intentions are not enough!)
To: truthguy
It won’t. Only conservative opinion is controversial. Obama thinks so, so it must be true.
14
posted on
01/23/2009 5:10:15 PM PST
by
Trod Upon
(The Left killed my country.)
To: Jeff Gordon
Obama has said that he would have been five points ahead if Fox News did not exist. Of course he is going to want to revive the fairness doctrine. And I would posit that Obama if the media told the truth about you, you would have been 25 points behind.
To: JimSEA
Then FR might have to relocate to servers in Panama like Free Dominion did.
16
posted on
01/23/2009 5:18:10 PM PST
by
coydog
(Proud to have slept through the Obama coronation!)
To: Red Steel
“And I would posit that Obama if the media told the truth about you, you would have been 25 points behind.”
And a liberal would ask you “What’s your point”? ;)
17
posted on
01/23/2009 5:18:20 PM PST
by
Delacon
("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
To: Delacon
Whatever happened to the old liberal saying “if you don’t like something, change the channel?”
To: Delacon
Obama invoked Rush’s name today when speaking about ‘those seeking to delay the stimulus bill.’ I cannot recall President Bush publicly criticizing a commentator or journalist by name.
Obama doesn’t have the balls to say it to his face. For that matter, Obama doesn’t have the balls to speak with Rush or Hannity face to face.
He will slip up sooner rather than later and the entire nation will see him for what he is—a Chicago thug.
To: Delacon
20
posted on
01/23/2009 5:30:47 PM PST
by
malkee
(Actually I'm an ex-smoker--two and a half years-- But I think about it every day.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson