Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coleman Campaign To Ask That All 12,000 Rejected Absentee Ballots Be Reviewed For Potential Counting
Coleman for Senate ^ | January 19th 2009 | Official Press Release

Posted on 01/19/2009 6:37:56 PM PST by flattorney

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: flattorney
One last question:

We got stuck with John “RINO & Traitor” McCain for President because of the PBC and no other reason.

What is "PBC"?

41 posted on 01/20/2009 2:21:14 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: flattorney
Does anyone really believe that an FR approved conservative Republican can get elected as MN Governor or U.S. Senator? Does anyone really believe that if Norm Coleman was more conservative he would have beaten Al Franken, and the National GOP would not be in this mess?

Respectfully, this is a dumbass post and exactly what I would expect from moderate milquetoast republicans! Of course, if Colman was more conservative, conservatives would have not abandoned the whole GOP/RNC. I don't care if MN is liberal or not. I don't want some loser moderate/rino representing and creating a liberal side to the republican party.

The only way we are really ever going to get things done in the republican party is by electing conservatives.

It's just plain stupid to put in someone who is a rino, knowing at least half the time they won't get elected, and the other half of the time they're trying ruin conservatism in the party. It's the height of idiocy, unless your party is fully conservatively controlled and the rino's all come on board!

I can beat Al Franken with conservatism in a heartbeat, it takes alot to rid yourself of the enemy within! Coleman's going to most likely lose anyways. After all, as you say the state is a windbag liberal state with losers, and I don't want another one in my party!

42 posted on 01/20/2009 2:43:07 PM PST by sirchtruth (Gravity Of The Situation...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MNnice

“Aint gonna happen. The court consists of a liberal, an “independent” and a rino. Coleman’s toast.”

It will go to SCOTUS and they will once again overturn the agenda’d decision of a leftist court.


43 posted on 01/20/2009 3:33:25 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz ("Control the information, you control the people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

I’d like to think you’re right, but I’m guessing the SCOTUS won’t get involved in a state election (as opposed to FL 2000, when the election there had nationwide implications).


44 posted on 01/20/2009 3:42:37 PM PST by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth

Feel free to raise the money and start you own Conservative National Party. They will come. - TAB


45 posted on 01/20/2009 4:15:59 PM PST by flattorney (See my comprehensive FR Profile "Straight Talk" Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: flattorney

After the recount, the (MN) Secretary of State has some explaining to do
Morrison County Record (MN)
Tom West General Manager/Editor
January 16, 2009

I don’t know about you, but the more I read about the Senate recount battle between Norm Coleman and Al Franken, the more upset I am with the slipshod way the election was conducted.

Now, I want to make clear that I am not referring here to Morrison County Auditor Russ Nygren, his staff or this county’s many election judges. This county was involved in six recounts (two city council, three legislative and the Coleman-Franken race) and except for a few counting errors, and perhaps one improperly rejected absentee ballot, no other mistakes were uncovered. The recounts of the council and legislative races verified the initial result. Only the Senate race remains in limbo, but only because of problems that occurred elsewhere in the state, particularly Minneapolis.

The state Canvassing Board said that Franken had 225 more votes in the recount than Coleman. However, a widespread misunderstanding exists of what the Canvassing Board was expected to do. Its job was to count the ballots as presented to them. The contested decisions on which ballots were either improperly withheld or presented to the Canvassing Board still need to be decided in court. In fact, the Minnesota Supreme Court, in several rulings last month, invited a lawsuit to resolve those issues.

Except for a few extreme partisans, I think most Minnesotans want to be sure that all legal votes are counted. However, I doubt now that we will ever know if that happened. Secretary of State Mark Ritchie, as the chief election officer of the state, is responsible for the mess along with a number of county auditors and city election officials. Part of Ritchie’s job is to train the county auditors, and in the larger cities the city clerk or chief election officials, how to conduct a fair election. It’s the job of those he trains to then teach the election judges their duties. It’s clear that as teachers, Ritchie and some others are lacking.

That became obvious when both the Franken and Coleman campaigns agreed that 1,346 absentee ballots were wrongly rejected all across the state by local election officials. Those ballots were crucial to the outcome. At the heart of Coleman’s lawsuit challenging the Canvassing Board result, however, are an additional 654 absentee ballots that Coleman thinks should be included, but Franken did not.

In one of the Supreme Court rulings, it was decided that only the rejected ballots upon which the two campaigns agreed should be included in the recount. However, the campaigns have no special standing in this recount; it’s the people’s will and the integrity of the voting process that is in question. If Franken or Coleman objected to including a ballot, then the judgement of local officials, who had already acknowledged 1,346 mistakes, was allowed to stand.

That the Secretary of State did not step in and ask the Supreme Court for statewide uniformity in determining whether ballots were wrongly rejected, reflects poorly on his leadership. (I should note that on this point alone, for Coleman to win the overall election, he probably would need 60 percent of the 654 ballots to be in his favor, compared to 25 percent for Franken and 15 percent for Dean Barkley or other third party candidates. That’s not likely to happen; probably the best he could do on this point is to push the margin under 100 votes.)

But other issues remain. Coleman alleges that absentee ballots may have been counted twice in 17 Minneapolis, one St. Louis Park and three St. Louis County precincts. The reason for the double-counting most likely is that many absentee ballots get folded into envelopes and mailed and then won’t go through the counting machines. The law is clear that when that happens, the election judges are to make a duplicate ballot, mark it as “duplicate” and the original ballot as “original” and then feed only the duplicate through the machine. That apparently didn’t happen in those 21 precincts. Again, that is a training issue. But these precincts voted 65 percent for Franken, and only 21.7 percent for Coleman, so if 150 votes were counted twice, using those same percentages alone, Coleman could pick up about 66 votes.

In two other precincts, Maplewood Precinct 6 and St. Paul Ward 3 Precinct 9, more votes were cast than there were voters. In Maplewood, the explanation is that the judges tried to run the absentee ballots through during the middle of the day and were interrupted, and didn’t get some of them included until after doing the final machine count. Still, the count shows 31 more ballots than voters. And then there is the infamous Minneapolis Ward 3 Precinct 1, where 133 ballots allegedly turned up missing. The original count is still being used, which increases Franken’s margin of victory by 46 votes. How can a recount include numbers with no paper trail? Most likely, those ballots never existed, but 133 others were double counted.

Ritchie keeps saying that this is a fair and impartial recount. How would he or anyone else know that with any certainty? He has a lot of explaining to do. What will he do to avoid a repeat? In addition, if Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak doesn’t do anything to clean up that city’s election division, he should forget about his gubernatorial bid. Thankfully, the Legislature is holding hearings on election reform. Lawmakers would do well to start by focusing on training issues.


46 posted on 01/20/2009 4:18:07 PM PST by flattorney (See my comprehensive FR Profile "Straight Talk" Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I can always tell from these threads who actually worked on a campaign/ worked on legislation to get passed and who hasn’t.


47 posted on 01/20/2009 4:21:45 PM PST by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth

>>
I can beat Al Franken with conservatism in a heartbeat, it takes alot to rid yourself of the enemy within!
>>

No, you can’t. Loser advocates like you type away and basically claim to be superior to Ronald Reagan.

Yes, that’s exactly what you just did. He lost in Minnesota, but you claim to be able to win there.

Colenman can win as a Republican there, and probably did. Support his fight.

Take your pro Democrat majority babble back to DU.


48 posted on 01/20/2009 4:47:37 PM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: flattorney
Feel free to raise the money and start you own Conservative National Party. They will come. - TAB

Nope! I'm staying right, smack dab in the middle of the republican party and fighting this war. Moderate/rino's, are the one's who will be leaving if I have anything to do with it!

The Republican Party is the Conservative Party!

49 posted on 01/20/2009 4:58:08 PM PST by sirchtruth (Gravity Of The Situation...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Owen
Take your pro Democrat majority babble back to DU.

I'll put my republican conservative credentials up against yours any day, bub!

It's going to fun kicking you losers out of MY party!

50 posted on 01/20/2009 5:00:46 PM PST by sirchtruth (Gravity Of The Situation...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; justiceseeker93; ..
Ping!
51 posted on 01/20/2009 5:04:14 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Here's what this is about! The future of the Republican Party! We can not win with moderate/rino's. Even when moderate/rino's win, we lose! It's a simple concept and until conservatives control the republican party again, the party will not be in the majority and liberals, moderates, and rino's will take over our lives and destroy America!

The fight for this party is right now, with conservatives, and conservatism we all can win. We have to rid this party of moderate/rino control and the only way to do this right now is for conservatives to kick some major ass for control of this party!

Coleman can either join conservatives, or get his rino ass out of my conservative Republican party!

52 posted on 01/20/2009 6:19:50 PM PST by sirchtruth (Gravity Of The Situation...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: flattorney

Wow - ask for a reevaluation of the recounted ballots - well after the thief is sworn in to office and seated...


53 posted on 01/20/2009 6:24:58 PM PST by TheBattman (Pray for our country....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tyke

I am ashamed that Minnesota has so many sheep - not only that there are enough idiots to even have made this race close, but that the slight majority who voted for Coleman haven’t stood up in a tangible way to the imposed tyranny.

Maybe Minnesota doesn’t deserve to remain a state... OF course, that should go for several states that voted for Obama too... but that is a whole different story.


54 posted on 01/20/2009 6:27:18 PM PST by TheBattman (Pray for our country....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: flattorney
Photobucket
55 posted on 01/20/2009 6:31:59 PM PST by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJL
At every turn Norm's first impulse is to side with the opposition, I'm done voting for that. A gross mischaracterization. Coleman's lifetime ACU rating is 73. If you somehow think that expelling all the RINO's is worth trading a 73 ACU rating for a big fat 0, then we conservatives really are a stubborn hard-headed bunch. Norm Coleman has to win elecitons back home. I could care less about what he says as long as enough of his actions are conservative (he did vote for the tax cut after all) and with a the democrats within one seat of a filibuster-proof senate, we could use the breathing room for the 2010 elections.
56 posted on 01/21/2009 6:00:23 AM PST by DiogenesLaertius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLaertius

amen


57 posted on 01/21/2009 6:04:19 AM PST by linn37 (cue the circus music the democrats are back in charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: flattorney

Little late Norm.


58 posted on 01/21/2009 6:10:06 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Government only does one thing well - WASTE MONEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buck W.

“a conservative candidate who could actually win, like Rudy”

I also liked Rudy, and would have preferred him instead of McCain except for his position on some social issues like abortion. He really did turn New York City around with his law-and-order approach. He was also the funniest candidate in the primaries, he really knows how to whack the opposition with his one-liners.


59 posted on 01/21/2009 6:24:47 AM PST by Texan Tory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: flattorney

praying on the left coast...


60 posted on 01/21/2009 9:12:31 AM PST by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson