Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evidence Mounts: Ayers Co-Wrote Obama's Dreams
American Thinker ^ | 10-17-08 | Jack Cashill

Posted on 01/18/2009 6:31:42 PM PST by STARWISE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 last
To: STARWISE
I'm starting to get a frightening feeling.

It has to do with the courts, especially the Supreme Court, and how they look at the pros and cons of Obama's presidential eligibility mess.

My growing, frightening feeling has to do with the following statement:

In my opinion, the courts, especially the Supreme Court, have come to a distorted, perverted conclusion that the best thing that could happen to the American people at this time is that America have its first black President of the United States no matter what terrible damage Obama's presidency does to America's almost sacred belief in the Constitution of the United States.

That is, in this crucial time in American history , the courts seem to have decided that having a black president for the first time is much more important than having the courts uphold and enforce the presidential eligibility clause in the Constitution of the United States.

I have nothing more to say.

It just makes me sick the more I think about how the courts, especially the Supreme Court, do not want to do anything to clear up this Obama presidential eligibility mess.

61 posted on 01/19/2009 2:03:28 PM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: john mirse

IMO if the SCOTUS does nothing, then they have signed their own death warrant; in the sense of making themselves 100% irrelevant, as well as becoming traitors. And with that, our Republic is basically finished.


62 posted on 01/19/2009 2:14:34 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: john mirse
Could you please help me to understand how Chief Justice Roberts will administer the oath of office to Obama?

My confusion is about the following step in the swearing- in ceremony: At what point does Chief Justice Roberts hold up a copy of the U.S. Constitution while Obama sets a small corner of the Constitution on fire with a match for all the world to see? Thanks.


Recall that a few days ago, Chief Justice Roberts met with Obama and Biden in a closed meeting. I'm assuming that he got something verbal from Obama. But then "the 1" is capable of lying quite well, so who knows what happened at the meeting. Have you listened to this http://www.flixxy.com/political-systems.htm yet? Obama thinks that the Constitution is "flawed" but ONLY TO A GLOBALIST would it be considered flawed. It has worked perfectly well since 1787, so it's not "us" who have the problem with it. It's the "new guy" who's 1/2 White and wants us to think he's a "black man" when he's more a Middle Eastern Caucasoid man. But then I'm back on one of my soapboxes. . . sorry.
63 posted on 01/19/2009 3:29:41 PM PST by HighlyOpinionated ("...there are two things in Washington that are unbalanced—the budget and the liberals." R Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson