1 posted on
01/15/2009 12:47:39 PM PST by
Red Steel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
To: Red Steel
493 posted on
01/15/2009 4:49:38 PM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Red Steel
Pilot joke: "What do you think was the last thing to go through that bird's mind?"
"His a$$."
524 posted on
01/15/2009 9:18:50 PM PST by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: Red Steel; All
Here's a unique view (of the a/c) that I posted on the smaller thread about the flight into the Hudson...
US Airways Flight 1549 descends on its way to an emergency ditching in the Hudson River, New York, Thursday Jan. 15, 2009. The Airbus A320 bound for Charlotte, N.C., struck a flock of birds just after takeoff minutes earlier at LaGuardia Airport, apparently disabling the engines. The pilot maneuvered the crippled jetliner over New York City and ditched it in the frigid Hudson River, and all 155 on board were pulled to safety as the plane slowly sank. (AP Photo/Trela Media)
To: All
Too many posts to read, not enough time so if these have already been posted forgive me! All praises to God for this miracle, since I haven't heard many people on the air mention it out loud!!
The Smoking Gun site has pilot info on it here under
The Hero of Flight 1549...best line of the article?
"Sullenberger, who now must be considered the front runner to replace Hillary Clinton as New York's junior United States Senator, is also the founder of Safety Reliability Methods. LOL!! :-)
Reuter's
Slideshow of amazing rescue pictures.
Raw footage behind the scenes video of rescuers.
548 posted on
01/16/2009 9:04:55 AM PST by
pillut48
(CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
To: Red Steel; All
To: Red Steel; NormsRevenge; TankerKC; AFPhys; A.A. Cunningham
This landing is a miracle regardless of my question.
Did the plane go under the George Washington Bridge or over it. Even if it went over the bridge, it is a tall bridge, and the flight did not gain much altitude.
Going under the bridge would have been treading the needle, and maybe impossible to not have the tail hit bridge for as far down the Hudson it was able to go before landing (ditching).
I thought I had seen a comment that someone said the plane went under the George Washington Bridge, which does not sound very credible...
555 posted on
01/16/2009 6:46:53 PM PST by
topher
(Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
To: Red Steel
First they took our ponds, and we said nothing because no one bothered trying to fish in ponds. Then it was our golf courses, and I did nothing because I don't play golf. After that, it was large parking lots, and I said nothing because they were easy to maneuver around and I thought they were cute. But now their taking their airplanes. Bastards.
559 posted on
01/16/2009 10:02:07 PM PST by
dr_who
To: Red Steel
576 posted on
01/19/2009 9:09:11 PM PST by
doug from upland
(10 million views of .HILLARY! UNCENSORED - put some ice on it, witch)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson