Thomas More Law Center’s Pro-Life Victory Stands Says U.S. Supreme Court (Yes, We Can Protest for

Thomas More.org ^ | January 13, 2009

[Fred]

And so did Tom More way before Tynsdale.

Get over it Tynsdale did a very poor job of translating the bible.. no reason to wack ihm ,but it still was a poor translation.

[informavoracious]

How Holocaust pictures affect me is different from how they affect a Palestinian. How abortion pictures affect me is different from how they affect a pro-choicer.

In the minds of many pro-choicers, bloody fetus pictures=anti-abortion extremism=abortion clinic bombers=crazies. And our popular media reinforces these stereotypes.

A woman in difficult circumstances considering abortion will block these graphic pictures out of her mind and avoid interacting with what she sees as self-righteous pro-lifers who have no understanding of how it feels to be in her shoes.

It is far better to show mercy for her and be approachable than alienate her and remove all opportunity for discussion.

[informavoracious]

The medical picture you show is not a bloody picture of baby body parts and is not what the case was about.

[informavoracious]

11-13 year olds need to see the bloody pictures? There was a middle school close by.

[usar91B]

I know. someone mentioned that non-bloody photos were possibly more effective. I was pointing out that there were already such photos circulating. The shocking photos Are more effective at communicating the brutality of Abortion. IMHO

[Clump]

This case is not about tact or appropriateness, so your comment is not really responsive to the article. The decision was Constitutionally sound, and the Supreme Court made the right call in not taking it up on Cert. A decision to the contrary would show an outright hostility towards pro lifers based simply on the view point of the messenger.