Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN Places Sarah Palin With 2008's Criminals, Sex Addicts, and the Corrupt
Newsbusters ^ | January 4, 2009 | Warner Todd Huston

Posted on 01/04/2009 11:52:27 AM PST by SolidWood

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-154 next last
To: EGPWS

The Democrats have abandoned normal people. If you don’t have a hypenated or “ism” added to your description, then the Democratic Party is for you.


61 posted on 01/04/2009 12:43:26 PM PST by RedMonqey (Embracing my "Inner Redneck")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Sometimes I wish we got angry like yoots. CNN would really have something to report about!


62 posted on 01/04/2009 12:43:44 PM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Live your principles. Don't just type them here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

CNN paid Saddam and his ministry of information for exclusive access to Iraq while he was busy murdering his people. CNN of course could not report this as they would lose their exclusive access.

Tell me again what qualifies CNN to pass judgment on anyone for corruption?


63 posted on 01/04/2009 12:44:37 PM PST by listenhillary (No representation without taxation! ~~ Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey
If you don’t have a hypenated or “ism” added to your description, then the Democratic Party is for you.

??

64 posted on 01/04/2009 12:45:47 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: littlehouse36
That picture says alot.

A happy, well adjusted, married American mother.

And a damned good looking babe to boot!!!

She's too good for Obama’s “nation”

65 posted on 01/04/2009 12:46:10 PM PST by RedMonqey (Embracing my "Inner Redneck")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: OnTheDress
C who? N who? N who?

Communist News Network

66 posted on 01/04/2009 12:47:46 PM PST by PistolPaknMama (Al-Queda can recruit on college campuses but the US military can't! --FReeper airborne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nbhunt
Those Demos are sooooooo afraid of Palin. They are starting very early to smear her, just for the run in 2012. They know they have a big job when it comes to Palin.

With all due respect, you are mistaken. I don't think there are words in the English language to describe how keenly the Democrats want Palin as the Republican candidate in 2012.

67 posted on 01/04/2009 12:47:51 PM PST by BrokenSmile (Fiat justitia, ruat caelum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
"Okay, Okay I'm a guy BUT Sarah's politics are what REALLY turn me on to her!"

And I read Playboy for the articles. :)

68 posted on 01/04/2009 12:48:41 PM PST by LiberConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey
A happy, well adjusted, married American mother.

And a damned good looking babe to boot!!!

Comment #1 creates comment #2, don't you think?

I sure do!

69 posted on 01/04/2009 12:49:31 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

Sorry

Correction:

If you have a hypenated or “ism” added to your description, then the Democratic Party is for you.


70 posted on 01/04/2009 12:49:31 PM PST by RedMonqey (Embracing my "Inner Redneck")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: okie01
"What if we picked a candidate who recognized the MSM as our enemy and chose to openly go to war with them?"

I think that would be great; it would be ideal. Unfortunately, for someone to pull that off, they would need to be a master communicator.

When I watched the Palin/Couric interview, there were multiple opportunities that Palin missed to paint Couric as a shill for the Dems. But, she missed them - she was like a deer caught in the headlights.

If you a Republican at the national level and you don't understand that every interview you do will be hostile, then you ARE and idiot.

We need someone like Giuliani (not Guiliani himself). RG was a spectacular mouthpiece for the Republican party after the convention. Why? Because, as a lifelong prosecutor expected the unexpected and could turn tough questions around and score points against the interviewer and the opposition. He was masterful. I should add, Romney wasn't bad either - and I wasn't a Romney supporter.

Palin's a nice lady with a compelling back story. She also appears to be a successful state CEO and I'm glad she's a conservative but she just doesn't have the intellectual horsepower to compete on the national stage. If you can't beat Katie freakin Couric in the interview game, you just don't have what it takes. Sorry!

71 posted on 01/04/2009 12:49:43 PM PST by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: LiberConservative
And I read Playboy for the articles. :)

What newspaper is that?

That's a new one to me. /snicker

72 posted on 01/04/2009 12:51:13 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

They fear Sarah like the Devil fears Holy Water!!!


73 posted on 01/04/2009 12:52:24 PM PST by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

No, not when spouting stupidity. Even Goebbels was not stupid. Goebbelization is when the MEDIA, rather than reporting neutral truths, decides instead to produce propaganda with the goal of shaping and OWNING public opinion.

You were right on with your comparison. In Nazi Germany it was the media (pwned by Goebbels) that got average Germans to believe the Jews were the root of all their problems and needed to be exterminated. Controlling the press is the most important thing to do in order to mold a country to someone’s will and annihilate freedom.


74 posted on 01/04/2009 12:54:29 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey

Shiite happens my FRiend. ; )


75 posted on 01/04/2009 12:54:51 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Big_Monkey
What complete nonsense.

CNN works for the UnAmerican Democrat Party...as do the rest of the press.

Of course they will work to define perceptions.

And conservatives picking Harvard grads who don't drop their g's, will do nothing to change that fact.

Just watch a Senate Judicial Hearing, and see how our "smart and articulate" nominees have their reputations and careers destroyed.

Do not choose candidates to satisfy the MSM....it's like battered woman syndrome....you will never do enough to stem their wrath.

76 posted on 01/04/2009 12:54:58 PM PST by roses of sharon ("No socialist system can be established without a political police.", Churchill -1945)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
Controlling the press is the most important thing to do in order to mold a country to someone’s will and annihilate freedom.

And then there was the second amendment....

77 posted on 01/04/2009 12:57:17 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: BrokenSmile

Gibberish. They want another old RINO they can easily beat.


78 posted on 01/04/2009 12:57:21 PM PST by SolidWood (Sarah Palin - Everything that is Sweetness and Light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Rodney Dangerfield

To clear up your definition, it’s not “some” it’s “most” voters are stupid. I would venture to say that over 50% of the registered voters in this or any other state don’t have the intelligence to vote let alone figure out who is lying and about what. Intellectual laziness and lack of education are the cornerstones of the “democrat” platform.


79 posted on 01/04/2009 12:57:35 PM PST by junkman_106 (The ACLU can go have aerial intercourse with a revolving glazed pastry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

The GOP will act outraged, but secretly be glad.

The DC GOP is every bit the globalist "conspiracy" as the rest of the elitist DC crowd. Has not GWB proved it? Has not John McCain proved it? Have not the US Senators (except for a few) proved it?

Sarah Palin is an outsider threat to that cabal. A terrible terrible threat to the Oligarchy.

The United States could easily be, geographically, recourcefully, and energetically, a society that could tell, not in an isolationist manner but in an independent manner, the rest of the world to screw itself. And Sarah Palin knows it. They HATE her.

A leader is not one who falls into the abyss of world populism and mediocrity, but one who has the courage to break away from that, into the creative path of independence. The United States was once that.

Jay Rockefeller and the CFR are elitist scum. Cultivated methinks by the arrogant jerks of the Ivy League.

This of course is the agenda of Anthropogenic Global Warming.

You heard it from the Suntrade Institute.

80 posted on 01/04/2009 12:59:03 PM PST by jnsun (The LEFT: The need to manipulate others because of nothing productive to offer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson