Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/18/2008 12:56:53 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: NormsRevenge

I bet those wiretaps hold up just fine. This is lawyer bluster and bamboozle them with BS time.


34 posted on 12/18/2008 1:12:10 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

From `Liar, Liar’, the movie

Fletcher: Your honor, I object!
Judge: Why?
Fletcher: Because it’s devastating to my case!
Judge: Overruled.
Fletcher: Good call!


38 posted on 12/18/2008 1:15:40 PM PST by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

So just how great a shock would it be for a leftist thug politician to beat the rap?


39 posted on 12/18/2008 1:16:28 PM PST by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

I’m not sure that technicality counts in the impeachment process. It might keep Blago out of jail, though, if this is anything more than a defense lawyer talking out of his Clymer.


48 posted on 12/18/2008 1:57:27 PM PST by NonValueAdded (once you get to really know people, there are always better reasons than [race] for despising them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Its like the movie “Liar, Liar” when Jim Carey loudly objects to the prosecution’s witness. The judge asks him why and he shouts “Because this is devastating to my client!!”


49 posted on 12/18/2008 1:57:46 PM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Don’t overlook the obvious; the PEOPLE OF ILLINOIS elected this jerk. It’s their baby; let them handle it. Hell, if he serves 5-10, they’ll REALLY love him. The Marion Barry effect....


51 posted on 12/18/2008 1:58:46 PM PST by catchem (NEVER UNDERESTIMATE THE STUPIDITY OF THE AMERICAN VOTER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

It doesn’t matter, the impeachment panel can look at anything it likes whether legal or illegally obtained. They could admit rumors, hearsay, add up all his bad hair days, it don’t matter.

This isn’t a court of law, its a committee.

JB


52 posted on 12/18/2008 2:00:26 PM PST by thatjoeguy (Just my thoughts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Interesting.

It looks like Blags wiretapping is admissable federally but not in the state of Ill.

Federal wiretapping evidence admissible though barred by state law: evidence gathered in a joint federal-state investigation is admissible in state court if it complies with federal, though not state, eavesdropping law.

The Illinois Supreme Court has affirmed a 30-year line of appellate court decisions holding that evidence obtained in compliance with federal wiretapping law is not inadmissible in a state prosecution, even though Illinois's own eavesdropping law would prohibit it. The case is People v Coleman, 2008 WL 351682.

Article

54 posted on 12/18/2008 2:03:45 PM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

same excuse used by another paid-for Democrat named William Jefferson. D-LA used.

In each case, they plead there was no crime committed as info was not legally obtainable.

The Dems are consistent on this. Blago will use any excuse to not fess up.


56 posted on 12/18/2008 2:17:54 PM PST by bestintxas (It's great in Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Weak sauce. A terrible opening move. Gov. Zod is stalling until Barry’s knees shake.


59 posted on 12/18/2008 2:34:36 PM PST by StAnDeliver (We Are Your Overlords.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
What else would you expect a shyster to say!!! They need some point to argue..
61 posted on 12/18/2008 2:40:36 PM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge


70 posted on 12/18/2008 3:49:42 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Okay, Dems, for years you have beat us about the head and neck with Nixon.

Now your guy is proven to be far more corrupt, venal and ruthless, and he wasn’t previously inoculated by a sex scandal.

So it’s our turn to talk about the Culture of Corruption. Soon, counting Spitzer, you’ll have had two governors in as many years run out of town for severe moral lapses.


71 posted on 12/18/2008 3:52:21 PM PST by RightOnTheLeftCoast ([In the primaries, vote "FOR". In the general, vote "AGAINST". ...See? Easy.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Okay. Now we know the tapes of the phone calls are devastating.
That’s the only message you can take away from a lawyer looking for loopholes.
If the evidence will kill you, kill the evidence.


78 posted on 12/18/2008 7:57:32 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson