Skip to comments.
L.A. Council Tightens Gun, Ammunition Laws
The Los Angeles Times ^
| December 18, 2008
| Maeve Reston
Posted on 12/18/2008 11:48:23 AM PST by dbz77
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
"We use this to stop a vehicle," Bratton said, holding up a .50-caliber bullet longer and thicker than a finger. "Unless you are out trying to kill Godzilla, and I think the last time we saw Godzilla was in the 1950s, there is no need for this type of weapon" unless it is in the hands of the military or law enforcement, he said.
The police use .50 caliber ammunition to stop vehicles.
Whom do criminals attack more, police or non-police?
1
posted on
12/18/2008 11:48:23 AM PST
by
dbz77
To: dbz77
Question: When was the last time you saw a gang-banger walking into a legitimate gunshop and buy ammunition?
To: dbz77
"We use this to stop a vehicle," Bratton said, holding up a .50-caliber bullet longer and thicker than a finger. "Unless you are out trying to kill Godzilla, and I think the last time we saw Godzilla was in the 1950s, there is no need for this type of weapon" unless it is in the hands of the military or law enforcement, he said. No bubba, that's for US to decide, not you.
To: dbz77
I own a .50 rifle. Don’t know if it would crack and engine block tho...
To: dbz77
The second amendment is to kill them, not Bambi. When the cops are no longer afraid of us they will attack us. That is the history of all governments.
5
posted on
12/18/2008 11:51:51 AM PST
by
CodeToad
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
When was the last time you saw a gang-banger use a .50cal to rob a liquor store?
6
posted on
12/18/2008 11:53:05 AM PST
by
gc4nra
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Lemme know when you find out.....
;-)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Yes, it would. So would a .44mag, and maybe even a .357mag. As would a deer slug or a 30-06.
8
posted on
12/18/2008 11:53:52 AM PST
by
piytar
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
And when is a compartment in a car “secret?” Do the words “unconstitutionally vague” mean anything?
9
posted on
12/18/2008 11:54:44 AM PST
by
RandyGH
(Democrats--So far left they've left America)
To: dbz77
The move is intended to help reduce the city's gun and gang violence... Let's "break out" THAT broken record again!
NO. The new law IS intended to make it harder for law abiding citizens to defend themselves from the criminal element, and thus to become more dependent on the State and the police. There IS no other explanation. The lawmakers HAVE the data, they HAVE the statistics, and they STILL keep "tightening" gun laws. Their disingenuousness becomes more obvious (I hope) to everyone with every new statute.
10
posted on
12/18/2008 11:55:41 AM PST
by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Question: When was the last time you saw a gang-banger walking into a legitimate gunshop and buy ammunition?
Around the time I saw a gangbanger walk into Walgreens to buy a a few grams of cocaine.
11
posted on
12/18/2008 11:55:52 AM PST
by
dbz77
To: dbz77
To: Eric in the Ozarks
13
posted on
12/18/2008 11:56:48 AM PST
by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
To: dbz77
"unless it is in the hands of the military or law enforcement, he said."That just makes my blood boil.
"The muskets they used against the British Army were the assault rifles of the time. It is practical, rather than alarmist, to understand that unarmed citizens cannot be secure in their freedoms. Its convenient for gun banners to dismiss this argument by saying That could never happen here, this is America but history shows that only vigilant people can keep government under control. By banning certain weapons today, we may plant the seeds for tyranny to flourish ten, thirty, or fifty years from now." --Ron Paul
To: CodeToad
The second amendment is to kill them, not Bambi.
This is the gigantic politically incorrect elephant in the room no one wants to talk about. We don't have the 2A so we can hunt to feed ourselves. The Founding Fathers put the 2A in the Constitution so that we can shoot cops and soldiers if they follow government orders to deprive the people of their liberties.
And yes, I know how that sounds. But that really is the reason the 2A was drafted.
15
posted on
12/18/2008 11:58:56 AM PST
by
JamesP81
(Let the Great RINO Hunt of 2009 begin)
To: CodeToad
The second amendment is to kill them, not Bambi. When the cops are no longer afraid of us they will attack us. That is the history of all governments. Bingo.
This has nothing to do with "controlling crime". It has everything to do with reducing availability to long-range civilian anti-personnel capability (ie sniper tools) which might come into play during "civil insurrection" (rebellion against corrupt and/or invalid government agencies).
To: dbz77
There may be a ban on the 50BMG but you can get "elephant" guns at any high end sporting goods store. Those these may lack the long range of a military round they most definitely will penetrate engine blocks. Sorry if the image is too big, I use a widescreen monitor.
17
posted on
12/18/2008 12:00:03 PM PST
by
Eye of Unk
(Americans should lead America, its the right way.)
To: WayneS
www.quackenbushairguns.com
its .495 ball in a rifled bbl., 850 fps @ 3000psi.
To: dbz77
I can only speak for myself but I wouldn’t want to be killed by anything larger than a .308.
19
posted on
12/18/2008 12:03:08 PM PST
by
Jaxter
(Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum)
To: WayneS
....make it harder for law abiding citizens to defend themselves from the criminal element...Police and government is more like it.
20
posted on
12/18/2008 12:08:14 PM PST
by
Las Vegas Ron
(The tree of liberty is getting mighty dry)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson