Skip to comments.
Al Franken gets boosts in Minn. Senate recount
Breitbart.com/Associated Press ^
| 12/12/08
| BRIAN BAKST
Posted on 12/12/2008 11:42:25 AM PST by dr_who
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
A left winger's version of democracy indeed.
1
posted on
12/12/2008 11:42:25 AM PST
by
dr_who
To: dr_who
“The count on election night can not be trusted, we must recount.
Hmmmm, the recount costs us vote in this one county, therefore in this one county we can not trust the recount and must go with the election night results.”
2
posted on
12/12/2008 11:45:49 AM PST
by
icwhatudo
To: dr_who
The Demo crooks keep COUNTING and COUNTING and COUNTING! How long can the drag out a recount? Obviously, until their man wins! Just like in Washington State 2 years ago!
3
posted on
12/12/2008 11:46:01 AM PST
by
2harddrive
(...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
To: dr_who
Anyone know he status of the bag of overseas military ballots that were found intentionally mishandled hidden in a warehouse? Those should be counted and should favor Coleman handily over Franken.
4
posted on
12/12/2008 11:46:41 AM PST
by
jrooney
To: dr_who
Oh hell...just give the damn thing to Franken and get it over with. Stop insulting everyone's intelligence with the "found ballots" $hi+...it's really old and really getting boring.
The fix is in, and we all see where it's going, just let the babbling idiot have it.
5
posted on
12/12/2008 11:47:26 AM PST
by
FrankR
(“Turtle up”, economically, for the duration of the 0bamanation.)
To: dr_who
Yep, just keep counting until the bastard wins.
To: dr_who
"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything."-Josef Stalin
7
posted on
12/12/2008 11:48:24 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: RepublitarianRoger2
Apparently if there aren’t enough ballots to count, you just add some extras in from the last time you counted. Foregone conclusion: Franken will win by counting rejected absentee ballots, ballots from the first count added to the recount, and just enough challenged ballots going his way to swing the election in his favor.
I do hope that I am wrong.
8
posted on
12/12/2008 11:57:22 AM PST
by
ga medic
To: dr_who
"It was a great day for democracy," Franken attorney Marc Elias said of the state board's recommendations. " Franken's lawyer is a better comedic writer than he is.
To: dr_who
I predict when it all shakes out, it’s Franken +200. Just enough to put him over the top.
10
posted on
12/12/2008 12:03:43 PM PST
by
ScottinVA
(islam IS the problem!)
To: dr_who
I’d been wondering how the dems were going to pull this one out of the hats. Well, there it is!
11
posted on
12/12/2008 12:05:46 PM PST
by
ScottinVA
(islam IS the problem!)
To: 2harddrive
The Demo crooks keep COUNTING and COUNTING and COUNTING! How long can the drag out a recount? Obviously, until their man wins! Just like in Washington State 2 years ago!Also in the 50's Bogart movie "Key Largo".
12
posted on
12/12/2008 12:08:58 PM PST
by
fella
(.He that followeth after vain persons shall have poverty enough." Pv.28:19')
To: ga medic
“Mining” the rejected ballots for votes.
Sounds like a GAME. Winner take all.
What are the RULES of this game or maybe there aren’t any.
13
posted on
12/12/2008 12:27:48 PM PST
by
noah
(noah)
To: dr_who
At least 638 absentee ballots are known to have been rejected for something other than the four legal reasons for disqualification...
...The board acted after receiving a legal opinion from the office of Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson, a Democrat, that the missing absentee ballots should be counted"Missing absentee ballots"??? Is that an AP mistake? I thought the missing ballots were the alleged 133 from that one precinct - and not absentee.
And those "638 absentee ballots are known to have been rejected for something other than the four legal reasons" - weeks ago I read those ballots had been rejected for some darn good reasons --
like signatures not matching those on voter rolls!
So Dems get to count obviously fraudulent ballots now. Hey, somebody voted, even if it wasn't the person registered! Count 'em all ! /s
14
posted on
12/12/2008 12:28:31 PM PST
by
shhrubbery!
(Dear media: Palin is pure as Alaska snow - it's OBAMA who was "NEVER VETTED" !)
To: TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
"It was a great day for democracy," Franken attorney Marc Elias said of the state board's recommendations. " Franken's lawyer is a better comedic writer than he is.
That's really not saying much good about him. IMHO, Franken hasn't been funny at all for many years (if not decades).
15
posted on
12/12/2008 12:31:13 PM PST
by
Bob
To: noah
From what I can tell, the only rule is “make sure the Dem wins.” I doesn’t matter how you play, it only matters that you win.
16
posted on
12/12/2008 12:34:11 PM PST
by
ga medic
To: dr_who
Anybody who would vote for that idiot is really mentally challenged!
To: jrooney
Are you joking or is this an actual case?
18
posted on
12/12/2008 1:23:23 PM PST
by
MSF BU
(++)
To: MSF BU
It is an actual case that was reported in the news and highlighted here on FR. I have not heard anything else about it and curious to the status of the military ballots found sitting in a warehouse.
19
posted on
12/12/2008 1:39:40 PM PST
by
jrooney
To: dr_who
Coleman has appealed to the Minnesota Supreme Court to establish a uniform standard for counting the “fifth pile”.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson