Skip to comments.
Vatican condemns IVF, the Pill (Why is this so surprising alert!)
Reuters ^
| December 12, 2008
| Philip Pullella
Posted on 12/12/2008 6:09:21 AM PST by NYer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 361-367 next last
To: netmilsmom
The UK is not here. Oh, and by the way, a friend of mine had IVF in England, and by law, they can not transfer more than two embryos. In fact, most are now saying one should be the maximum.
Now, considering that England has government run healthcare, and IVF is paid for by the government... who do you think benefits from extra embryos? Here's a hint... its medical research.
If anything, the disturbing trend to use frozen embryos should scare all of us with government healthcare on the horizon in the US. If they are paying for IVF, you can bet some way, some how, the government will take as many embryos as they want to use for research. THAT should scare you a helluva lot more than families wanting to have children.
To: MyTwoCopperCoins
IVF ends with the implantation of the viable embryo.Nope. It ends with the fertilization. The evil of IVF is that it invites the born to dehumanize the unborn.
The remaining ones can be frozen in perpetuity, instead of being flushed, in order to satisfy moral obligations expected of us as a society.
How does wrongful perpetual imprisonment satisfy moral obligations?
142
posted on
12/12/2008 9:21:39 AM PST
by
Petronski
(For the next few years, Gethsemane will not be marginal. We will know that garden. -- Cdl. Stafford)
To: MHGinTN
We have lots of democrap agitprop liars claiming they are long-time lurkers. When youve been a member for a year or so well revisit your bonefides. In the meantime, murdering human beings to give yourself descendants isnt pro-life. Your agenda gets revealed by such blurting as the following misdirection: You have zero right to decide whether certain individuals or couples need to have their chance for lineage terminated, or not. What a disgusting effort to twist the perspective. typical Discuss the topic at hand, please. If I wanted judgments/ morality lectures, this is not where I'd come to seek them.
To: Petronski
How does wrongful perpetual imprisonment satisfy moral obligations? I don't know about that. I ask again, what about the terminally ill, under life-support?
To: rintense
This whole misconception about embryos being left to die is silly. Misconception?
LOL
145
posted on
12/12/2008 9:24:02 AM PST
by
Petronski
(For the next few years, Gethsemane will not be marginal. We will know that garden. -- Cdl. Stafford)
To: MyTwoCopperCoins
I don't know about that.I don't suppose you do.
146
posted on
12/12/2008 9:24:35 AM PST
by
Petronski
(For the next few years, Gethsemane will not be marginal. We will know that garden. -- Cdl. Stafford)
To: Petronski
I never said racial. You mean, that's what you "didn't" imply, when you shouted NAZI?
To: MyTwoCopperCoins
And now as a n00b you would presume to order me around when your perfidy to the youngest humans is pointed out. typical
148
posted on
12/12/2008 9:25:11 AM PST
by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: rintense
bull, many do six, or would the parents who have sextuplets have gotten pregnant 2 or 3 times at the exact same time as they had their 2 implanted?
Even if, as you say, they only implant 2, how many do they create to get those 2 viable? 4,6? What becomes of them, or are they just arbitrary? Any way you slice it, life is created in a lab just to be discarded when the choicest is implanted. It is agregious and disgusting to play God in this fashion and completely selfish and unecessary. We will not agree on our outlook here, time to move on.
149
posted on
12/12/2008 9:26:24 AM PST
by
wombtotomb
(since its "above his paygrade", why can't we err on the side of caution about when life begins?)
To: Petronski
I don't suppose you do. I suppose it's safe to presume, with that, you have run out of arguments. Good day!
To: rintense
Now, considering that England has government run healthcare, and IVF is paid for by the government... who do you think benefits from extra embryos? Here's a hint... its medical research.
I don't think you realize what
you are really talking about...
...so here is a picture of Dr. Josef Mengele
(without a pancake on his head).
151
posted on
12/12/2008 9:27:13 AM PST
by
Petronski
(For the next few years, Gethsemane will not be marginal. We will know that garden. -- Cdl. Stafford)
To: Petronski
The misconception is that its standard protocol. It isn't. Most women who do IVF do not have multiple embryos. Many arrest before making it to the freezing stage. Those that are kept frozen and used later have a less than 50% chance of becoming viable.
This misconception is that every woman who does IVF has tons of eggs/embryos. And that is simply not true.
To: MyTwoCopperCoins
I’m not out of arguments, I simply need no more. You are wrong and I have demonstrated it.
153
posted on
12/12/2008 9:27:52 AM PST
by
Petronski
(For the next few years, Gethsemane will not be marginal. We will know that garden. -- Cdl. Stafford)
To: MHGinTN
And now as a n00b you would presume to order me around when your perfidy to the youngest humans is pointed out. typical What's typical is your assumed moral superiority that allowed you to throw silly judgmental labels, instead of making good arguments. What's evident, by that, is that you not just lost; you were incapable of winning in the first place.
To: MyTwoCopperCoins
The issues of LIFE ARE moral issues. Hadn’t you noticed?
155
posted on
12/12/2008 9:28:44 AM PST
by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: Petronski
You are wrong and I have demonstrated it.In la-la land, perhaps.
To: rintense
I didn't see any mention of protocol, nor did I see any mention of tons. It happens.
Those that are kept frozen and used later have a less than 50% chance of becoming viable.
I wonder what the survival rate was at Auschwitz.
157
posted on
12/12/2008 9:29:53 AM PST
by
Petronski
(For the next few years, Gethsemane will not be marginal. We will know that garden. -- Cdl. Stafford)
To: allmendream
Life begins at the moment of contraception. You mean 'conception', right?
158
posted on
12/12/2008 9:30:12 AM PST
by
NYer
("Run from places of sin as from a plague." - St. John Climacus)
To: MyTwoCopperCoins
I realize it is over your head, but, well, that’s the point: It’s over your head.
159
posted on
12/12/2008 9:30:36 AM PST
by
Petronski
(For the next few years, Gethsemane will not be marginal. We will know that garden. -- Cdl. Stafford)
To: MHGinTN
The issues of LIFE ARE moral issues. Hadnt you noticed? So is the right to have biological progeny. Haven't you noticed? It's not merely a right- it's the driving force of all life on this planet. Ignore at your own peril.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 361-367 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson