Why must it come Down to Popular V. Patriotic: The Obama Eligibility Question?

American Chronicle ^ | December 10, 2008 | Rev. Michael Bresciani

[iopscusa]

I should think you might direct your tinfoil insults eleswhere if you are scared or embarassed. Speaking of which that goes for the rest of the skeptics here as well as the Rinos, the weak sister blogs and the Radio jocks!

[stevestras]

“Tinfoil-hat-wearing conspiracy kooks are seldom patriotic.”

Since you are casting stones, perhaps you can explain how calling for constitutional integrity makes somone a “tinfoil-hat wearing conspiracy kook”. Do you somehow think you are being more patriotic than they are by insulting them?

[nonsporting]

A conference on whether the Wrotnowski case will be heard is scheduled in the Supreme Court for Friday December 12, 2008. Lawyers in that case have had more time to prepare. The arguments similar to those in the Berg case and the wording have improved significantly.

It's the Wrotnowski and Donofrio cases which are similar--both address the "natural born" requirement. Berg's case questions Obama's citizenship--is he native born?

[Wil H]

Why must it come Down to Popular V. Patriotic:

It ain't either!

"It's the Cover Up, Stupid!"

The lying, stonewalling, forging of Government documents, trying to pass them off as genuine to deceive the nation and the knowing concealment of his ineligibility is what proves he is unfit to serve.

Nixon got canned for less.

[RegulatorCountry]

Do you somehow think you are being more patriotic than they are by insulting them?

A quick glance at the home page indicates an interest in "immigration and trade."

Ten bucks says that interest isn't enforcement related. Sounds like FROBL to me.

[Kevmo]

For your respective ping lists, and also for the mods to once again investigate keyword abuse on certifigate threads.

blackhelicopters; conspiracytheories; nirther; nutobamatrollsdaily; tinfoilhats; wingnutdaily;

[Admin Moderator]

We will not look into your request.

Thanks,

[Kevmo]

We will not look into your request.
***The admin mod did before and the troll “Searchin” was zotted. I notice that was when JimRob was cc’d. My keyword abuse investigation requests will be cc’ing JimRob from now on.

[Admin Moderator]

Whatever floats your boat.

[Kevmo]

Consistent policy floats my boat in this case.

[AmericanVictory]

I suspect that your attempt at distraction from the subject has no sound basis in constitutional law.

Just what are you obliquely referring to?

Have you got any indication that George W. Bush has violated the Constitution?

If so, what are the specifics and what are the sources for those specifics?

I believe that George W. Bush’s ultimate leadership could have been greater, particularly given the excellent start he made, but I cannot see where he failed to obey the Constitution, although he certainly could have, at several points, spoke out more strongly in its defense.