Posted on 12/01/2008 6:00:47 PM PST by Aquinasfan
Donofrio v. Wells, Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz: Major Updates on Conference, Cort’s Renewed Application
December 1st, 2008 at 7:49 pm
Leo Donofrio, Plaintiff in Donofrio v. Wells, has been able to confirm that his case was referred to the full Court by the full Court. This means that, per the docket, all 9 Justices have agreed to hold a “Rule of Four” Conference this Friday, December 5. And again, this means that if 4 of the 9 Justices respond in the affirmative to Leo’s case, we are instantly and potentially in unchartered waters (assuming they either agree to a stay of the Electoral College or agree to hold a hearing).
Leo also updated everyone on Cort Wrotnowski’s case (where Cort is Plaintiff), Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz. Apparently, after Cort called the Supreme Court requesting an update of his emergency stay renewal, he spoke with a certain individual who allegedly stated that his particular case (docket) had been referred to an anthrax containment facility! This news has led Leo Donofrio to call all concerned citizens to write the Supreme Court in diplomatic fashion to address this outrageous behavior.
There is also a rumor that the full Court may be seriously considering staying the Electoral College vote until after Barack Obama’s eligibility can be confirmed (the following excerpt from Leo):
Today I spoke with Patricia McCabe Estrada, Deputy Director of Public Information at the United States Supreme Court. She informed me that Mr. Donofrio’s application was first referred to the full Court by Justice Clarence Thomas on November 19, 2008. After that referral took place the full Court, and not Justice Thomas alone, distributed the application for an emergency stay for Conference of December 5, 2008. [emphasis mine]
We now know that the renewed request to halt the election was not denied and is actively being considered at the Supreme Court.
The following is the full text of Leo’s blog entry…
CONFIRMED BY SCOTUS: DONOFRIO V. WELLS WAS DISTRIBUTED FOR CONFERENCE OF DECEMBER 5, 2008 BY THE FULL UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Posted in Uncategorized on December 1, 2008 by naturalborncitizen
[UPDATE] Leo Donofrio and Cort Wrotnowski will be on Plains Radiotonight at 7:00 PM EST
CONFIRMED BY SCOTUS: DONOFRIO V. WELLS WAS DISTRIBUTED FOR CONFERENCE OF DECEMBER 5, 2008 BY THE FULL UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT AFTER FIRST HAVING BEEN REFERRED TO THE COURT BY JUSTICE THOMAS
by Bob Vernon, Honest American News - Plains Radio Network
December 1, 2008
On November 19, 2008, the official United States Supreme Court Docket for case number 08A407 - Leo C. Donofrio v. Nina Mitchell Wells, Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey - was updated to show that the “emergency stay application” to halt the national election and Electoral College meeting of 2008… was “DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2008.” At that time, it was not clear whether this was scheduled for conference by Justice Thomas alone or by the full Court.
In multiple interviews with Leo C. Donofrio, this reporter and other members of the Plains Radio Network, were informed by Mr. Donofrio that he suspected the distribution for conference was an action taken by more than Justice Thomas alone. Mr. Donofrio suggested that another docket update stating the emergency application was referred to the full court by Justice Thomas should have appeared on the docket prior to the distribution for conference.
Since the docket did not reflect a prior referral it was widely accepted that the distribution for conference was an act of Justice Thomas alone. Honest American News can now confirm - by direct contact with the Supreme Court’s Public Information Office - that the distribution for conference of DONOFRIO V. WELLS was an action taken by the full court.
On November 28, 2008, the docket for case number 08A407 was updated to show, retroactively, that Justice Clarence Thomas did in fact refer Donofrio’s emergency stay application to the full court on November 19, 2008. Last night in an interview with…Plains Radio Network, Mr. Donofrio suggested that this new update, nine days later, indicated that the full Court had taken action to distribute the case for conference. Mr. Donofrio cited a SCOTUS public information document issued to reporters entitled:
A REPORTER’S GUIDE TO APPLICATIONS Pending Before The Supreme Court of the United States
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/publicinfo/reportersguide.pdf
In that document, on page 3, it advises:
“The Circuit Justice may act on an application alone or refer it to the full Court for consideration. The fact that an application has been referred to the full Court may not be known publicly until the Court acts on the application and the referral is noted in the Court’s order.”
Mr. Donofrio pointed out in various interviews that since his case had been made public by the SCOTUS, there was probably a referral by Justice Thomas prior to the actual distribution for conference. Mr. Donofrio was correct.
Today I spoke with Patricia McCabe Estrada, Deputy Director of Public Information at the United States Supreme Court. She informed me that Mr. Donofrio’s application was first referred to the full Court by Justice Clarence Thomas on November 19, 2008. After that referral took place the full Court, and not Justice Thomas alone, distributed the application for an emergency stay for Conference of December 5, 2008.
Let me reiterate the main point: DONOFRIO V. WELLS was distributed for conference of December 5, 2008 by the full Court after a prior referral of the application by Justice Thomas.
Mr. Donofrio will be on the Plains Radio Network tonight. SeePlainsradio.com for details.
Bob Vernon
Honest American News
Plains Radio Network
State: Texas
They are trying to shortstop the case from going before Justice Scalia before the electors award the electoral votes to the Red.
Here. It is specifically for your opinion.
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/vanity-news/index
“You’re at variance with almost everybody’s opinion.”
Raus mit Bunkasaurus, huh?
Thank you for that Eva Braun moment
Alan Keyes is a Harvard Constitutional Law Scholar.
And a dam fine Patriot.
Obvious you know little about him and care less about the Constitution.
Yes, he said President Bush is aware that Leo’s case will go foward for oral arguments.
It was Cort Wrotnoskis’ suit that was “sidelined” for an anthrax test.
So you don’t care if Free Republic looks ridiculous?
It matters not to you if genuine conservative thought is further marginalized over the next 4-—or 8—years?
You’d rather stick your fingers in your ears?
Oh geez, Dave...you’ve been around here a while. “Go back to DU”? is THAT all ya got?
Section 1 of Article II of the Constitution
“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of
the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this
Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;
neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who
shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years,
and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
It matters not to YOU, that Obama may not meet the Constitutional requirements for President of the United States of America?
yes, stupid.
And obsessed, unrealistic, moonbatian, unhinged, ODS’ed, even, dare I say it, risible. (always wanted to work “risible” into a post :-)
N00b! Why do you ‘slum around’ here if your hold us in such ridicule? Go play on your obama kneepads soemwhere else.
If he shows proof that he is “natural born” then he qualifies.
Bunkasaurus:
"yes, stupid.
And obsessed, unrealistic, moonbatian, unhinged, ODS’ed, even, dare I say it, risible. (always wanted to work “risible” into a post :-)"
There it is for all eternity to see.
Bunkasaurus calls the Constitution stupid.
Oh, ok. Anyway, how obvious can you get? Sidelined for an anthrax check???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.