Skip to comments.
Evil Party Meets Stupid Party
The Backwater Report ^
| November 30, 2008
| Darrell Dow
Posted on 11/30/2008 4:36:39 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
We must fight this attempt at blanket amnesty with all our might, again!
To: MaggieCarta; indylindy; roamer_1; calcowgirl; djsherin; Sunnyflorida; SoConPubbie; Sybeck1; ...
On immigration, theres been an agreement between (President-elect Barack) Obama and (Arizona Republican Sen. John) McCain to move forward on that...
Weve got McCain and weve got a few others. The problem with Benedict McCain is that he's both evil and stupid. |
|
The Juan McCain Truth File. "I have great respect for Al Gore." John McCain, October 2, 2008 FR Keywords: mccaintruthfile, mcqueeg, mcbama Please tag all relevant threads with the aforementioned keywords. This can be a very high-volume ping list at times. To join the ping list: FReepmail rabscuttle385 with the subject line add mccaintruthfile. (Stop getting pings by sending the subject line drop mccaintruthfile.) Republican Commissars Warning: By joining this ping list, you may be subjected to the delusional rants and ramblings of McCainiacs, of "moderate" Republicans, of pragmatic conservatives resigned to voting for the lesser of two Democrats, and of countless GOP shills who simply want to meet a new overlord. |
|
2
posted on
11/30/2008 4:38:45 PM PST
by
rabscuttle385
("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Face it: we have a one party system. The only thing which could possibly cure it would be some sort of a voters’ bill of rights starting with runoff elections for all public offices and the two parties would never allow it.
3
posted on
11/30/2008 4:39:09 PM PST
by
wendy1946
To: 2ndDivisionVet
we will get mass amnesty, a real crowd pleaser supported only by cheap labor whores at the Business Roundtable, professional mulitculturalist ambulance chasers and Democrat operatives who see amnesty as a means of registering millions of new voters dependent on the state.That about sums it up. Americans don't want amnesty. That's been proven time and again in polls.
4
posted on
11/30/2008 4:40:29 PM PST
by
GVnana
("I once dressed as Tina Fey for Halloween." - Sarah Palin)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Republicrat party is alive and well.
5
posted on
11/30/2008 4:41:20 PM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
It wasn’t the stupid people that gave away the future with the $7.5 billion big business give away.
6
posted on
11/30/2008 4:48:03 PM PST
by
mountainlion
(concerned conservative.)
To: GVnana
Americans don't want amnesty. That's been proven time and again in polls.
Yes, and until we start marching on Washington, politicians are going to continue to ignore “the will of the people” on every issue because they believe they are superior to us. well, they may be superior to some of the DemonRAT voters, but they aren't my superiors. Even they enormous outcry against the bailouts didn't get their attention, they just carefully selected the Senators and Representatives that were not going to have to face the electors this year and ramrodded through what they wanted to. Until 20 million or so of us show up with torches and pitchforks, they are not going to change.
To: wendy1946
Face it: we have a one party system. I absolutely agree.
8
posted on
11/30/2008 4:56:09 PM PST
by
pray4liberty
(Always vote for life!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“Stupid Party”
Yup. That pretty much sums up the Republican movers and shakers for the last 20 years. Where is a Goldwater when you need him?
9
posted on
11/30/2008 4:57:23 PM PST
by
wgflyer
(Liberalism is to society what HIV is to the immune system.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
" ...we will get mass amnesty, a real crowd pleaser supported only by cheap labor whores at the Business Roundtable..."And let's not forget the cheap labor whores at the Wall Street Journal's editorial page - ironic indeed if you consider the general far-left tilt of the Journal's reporting staff.
10
posted on
11/30/2008 5:04:48 PM PST
by
Redbob
(W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?)
To: mountainlion
Need to keep a closer count. We’re up to $7 TRILLION, now.
11
posted on
11/30/2008 5:06:59 PM PST
by
ataDude
To: 2ndDivisionVet
That’s all we need is cheap Mexican labor, when half our citizens are liable to be out of jobs in the next couple of years.
Another great depression is coming down the tracks, and we need to import labor to handle it? I’m very worried about my kids and the kind of country they’ll be living in.
12
posted on
11/30/2008 5:13:58 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Cicero
Im very worried about my kids Best thing you can do for your kids, or grandkids, in my case, is to provide them with marketable skills and education. This means you may have to teach and train them yourselves! Grandma, Grandpa, give up some of that retirement largess for a decent education for your grandkids.
To: wgflyer
I’d rather be ‘stupid’ than ‘evil’.
14
posted on
11/30/2008 5:36:17 PM PST
by
MagnoliaB
(I)
To: MagnoliaB
“Id rather be stupid than evil.”
Just remember...evil depends upon stupid.
15
posted on
11/30/2008 5:42:48 PM PST
by
wgflyer
(Liberalism is to society what HIV is to the immune system.)
To: wendy1946
It’s one party with Envy and Fear factions. But they all do what Goldman Sachs tells them. ;)
16
posted on
11/30/2008 5:44:02 PM PST
by
Mr. Jeeves
("One man's 'magic' is another man's engineering. 'Supernatural' is a null word." -- Robert Heinlein)
To: wendy1946
I’d amend what you said to say that we have a one and a half party system. It’s not quite the Soviet Union, the disagreements (often enough with a wink, wink, nudge, nudge) are out in the open. Or one party with two chummy factions, howz that?!
17
posted on
11/30/2008 5:47:13 PM PST
by
Revolting cat!
(Everytime they open their mouth they shoot themselves in the foot.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The “stupid party” isn't the conservatives as there hasn't been a conservative party since Reagan. The stupid party is the Rino/moderate pseudo-Republican party.
18
posted on
11/30/2008 5:49:12 PM PST
by
GBA
To: Revolting cat!
I’ve seen the word “duopoly” used to describe it. A voters’ bill of rights should include runoff elections for all public offices so that nobody need ever fear to vote their first choice at least on a first ballot and there is such a thing as virtual runoff elections which would eliminate the hassle of second votes. There should also be a none-of-above choice on all ballots and if that guy ever wins, the other candidates should be barred for life from running for public office of any sort and the parties which sponsored them should be barred for ten years from running candidates for that particular office. The penalty for running dead wood for public office should be severe.
To: wendy1946
I absolutely agree, even if I think some of the details should differ. We’ve got a broken system of professional politicians, who even when booted out by term limits run for other offices or get appointed by their old buddioes (see Tommy Daschle, see just about every termed out Kalifornia politician.)
My idea is strict term limits for politicians and for their aides in Washington - out of the government forever once your term expires. I said recently, that I don’t want to serve on a local jury, but I’ll gladly serve one limit as a city councilman , a congresscritter or whatever. That’s how the Founding Fathers saw it.
20
posted on
11/30/2008 6:22:44 PM PST
by
Revolting cat!
(Everytime they open their mouth they shoot themselves in the foot.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson