Posted on 11/15/2008 8:44:17 PM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
See you tomorrow. Now run along. Your mother is calling.
http://www.postwritersgroup.com/parker.htm
Kathleen Parker's latest foaming spittle: Heresies and Other Truths November 19, 2008
Sorry that Noonan hasn't done any Palin-bashing lately (she's occupied with giving Obama's posterior a wash and Simonize...), but there's always next week...
God Bless you, joesbucks. May He heal your heart of your Palin-hatred. I don't know if He can do anything for your pin-up girls, though - they only respond to the main chance, and filthy lucre. :-)
I did see Tony Blankley last night make the comment that Obama ran his campaign mistake free. Sort of sounds like seamless.
Now granted, there were errors in that campaign. But they overall did a pretty good job.
You guys really need to get over the name calling and innuendo. It's just unseemly.
As for Sarah Palin, I have no hatred toward her. But I guess in your political universe if you're not 100% or more behind someone, then you must hate them. That's a little weird. And besides, she agrees with me that John McCain is the best leader in the nation right now. Unless she can't tell the truth. You know, that could be it. SoCons sometimes have trouble with that.
And thank you for the links. Although I generally see most of their columns here on good ol FR, so they aren't really unnecessary. Seems many people seem fixated on what these "pin up girls" have to say because they seem to get a lot of threads on the forum. Funny, none were initiated by me.
Hey, thanks for the early start. See you tomorrow.
I'm sure Tony was just being kind: "a lot of moderates voted for Obama because of the housing market crash, financial crisis, drop in 401(k) account values, and two wars..."
As for Sarah Palin, I have no hatred toward her. But I guess in your political universe if you're not 100% or more behind someone, then you must hate them. That's a little weird.
You were being a little weird in your anti-Palin posts. That's what caught my attention. Are you retracting those posts? Or are you just waiting for them to flow far enough away from Current Posts so you can pretend that you never wrote them, as you seem to be doing now?
I'm really glad you've become more circumspect towards Palin. If you get really out of hand in the future when it comes to that subject, we're keeping a few links handy to inform people on FR as to the nature of your Parker/Noonan/joesbucks nexus. :-)
And please spare me the drama. Saving my links? For what? to be a tattletale? My comments are permanently saved in the FR archives. I've not toned down my thoughts and the written expressions thereof about Governor Palin. However, you may tattle anytime about my "nexus" with the lady scribes.
What caught your attention IMHO is someone had a thought outside the forum orthodoxy box about Governor Palin.
The you chose to use the old Sean Hannity trick. You know, the one where someone has a criticism about President Bush and Sean's first words in response are "Why do you hate the President?"
All they had was a difference of opinion and he extrapolates it into hatred. That's simply weird. And yes there are Bush haters, but everyone who differs from the President is not a hater. I have a difference of opinion with me wife and I still love her. I may not believe my wife may be the best person for the job she's applying for, but I still love her. I may not like what she's chosen to wear that day, but I still love her. Simply not being 100% ga ga over someone doesn't mean you hate them.
If Governor Palin is a great contender for 2012 she will find a way to appeal beyond the base and that appeal will get her votes. If she doesn't she'll simply be politically the next Dan Quayle or Alan Keyes.
??? OK, I'm confused. I remember writing that "[a]fter this, you only get one post a day, but post I will". My reading of this says that I'll post to you daily in response to your inevitable reply, since you seem to need to have the last word. I was promising MYSELF a rationing the wasting of my time replying to you. If I want to waste some of my own time posting additional missives to you, then it's my time to waste, and my decision.
I don't see you being limited to one post anywhere except in your own mind, and certainly nowhere on the FR board. Of course, I have to remember that there's a lot of things in your mind, like "Obasma's seamless campaign" and "Sarah Palin, Idiot Savant" and Joe Biden, SuperGenius.
What caught your attention IMHO is someone had a thought outside the forum orthodoxy box about Governor Palin.
Humble, indeed. Your Palin thoughts were spoon-fed to you by Obama's media machine. Mmmmmmmmmmmm-good! BTW - they're not outside a "forum orthodoxy box", they're just like listening to ABCCBSNBCCNN.
Also BTW, I'll be gone for a while next week, but you won't be forgotten.
Enjoy your romp in the schoolyard, bullying everyone with your Obamedia views about Palin. :-)
On 11/11 you wrote After this, you only get one post a day, but post I will. So one post a day doesn't mean one post a day when you fancy to waste your time. Seems to me not only will you be wasting some time but that you wouldn't be keeping your word. How else can one post per day mean anything other than one post per day? I mean I have no problem with you wasting your time, but geez, have the decency to live up to your word. I mean c'mon, put your adult on and act like one.
And drop the "it's the medias fault. You'd think that after 40 years conservatives would figure out a way around the media bias. I really believe it's a much a crutch as it is a reality. I'm mean President Reagan figured it out. What's wrong with this batch? I mean if Governor Palin is to be the next Reagan, she's gotta figure out the media like President Reagan did. I mean everything can't be the fault of the media. Hope your time off is fruitful. Be careful and be well. Don't forget me when you get back.
I happen to be one of the media trackers from the beginning of Free Republic. I'm qualified to say that the media went over the top in this election. They didn't even bother to hide that they were WORKING for Obama.
They used to try to hide it, even during the impeachment wars. You had to parse what they were saying over a period of time to catch a pattern.
They WORK for the new government. Do you understand what that means?
I could explain many of the implications, but I'll let you reflect on them yourself.
Ah, but I thought the old media (television and newspapers) were dead. Yes, they were in bed for Obama, but again, smart ones like Reagan are able to get around it. The rest simply complain.
You may have thought that, but I never did. I know my adversary from long experience. I enjoy the posts of abb and Milhous, but I understand only too well that the snake won't be dead for a long while. Why do think Mapes was gloating some weeks ago?
Yes, they were in bed for Obama, but again, smart ones like Reagan are able to get around it.
It was different then.
You must be able to win in the areana of ideas to maintain a position either over the air or on cable/dish. If it makes money, it will air. As evidenced by Hannity and Limbaugh. But there would be tons of conservative shows if it meant viewers/listeners.
We've discussed why he hasn't spoken out, yet here was a prime opportunity and he says it truly is a financial crisis.
Just keep typing. You expose yourself more and more each day, and it ain't pretty.
Interesting that you were bashing Ann Coulter when you didn't have Palin to kick around. Now, Coulter isn't a hated "SoCon", but she's an intelligent woman, which is a major no-no in joesbucksworld. Palin is both an intelligent woman and a religious type, which really pops your cork (in more ways than one), it seems.
Actually Palin is probably more intellectually honest about who she is vs Annie.
Old fraud? My, my. Now that's a new label to hang on me. But please, you must be more contemporary in your attempts to marginalize.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.