Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Will Change Balance on Courts Quickly
newsmax.com ^ | November 12, 2008 | Ronald Kessler

Posted on 11/13/2008 5:55:35 AM PST by kellynla

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: jrooney; allmendream
Take THAT all you “conservatives” who stayed home or voted third party.

I keep hearing this but unfortunately I was away during the election and missed quite a bit of posts. What proof do we have that the election was lost because conservatives stayed home? From what I have read turnout was similar to 2004.
21 posted on 11/13/2008 7:58:41 AM PST by dmartin (Not the 'Change' you were 'Hoping' for? Don't blame me. I voted for Palin's running mate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dmartin

McCain received 8 million less votes from conservative voters that voted for GW in 2004.


22 posted on 11/13/2008 8:15:39 AM PST by jrooney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dmartin
Turnout was less than in 2004 for Republicans. McCain got less votes than bush in 2004 by a few million. Some of those 2004 Bush voters went over to 0bama, but many of them stayed home.
23 posted on 11/13/2008 8:21:00 AM PST by allmendream (Wealth is EARNED not distributed.... so how could it be Redistributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Well, about 90% of the cheerleaders here at F.R. were saying that we were going to win.

I laughed, but I still went and stayed on line for an hour and a half to vote for the pathetic old schmoo McCain and the Republicans.

I think it's time to start refocusing on the party itself that got clobbered so badly.

24 posted on 11/13/2008 8:31:01 AM PST by jpl (Does anybody have seven hundred billion dollars I can borrow?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: allmendream; jrooney

Thanks.


25 posted on 11/13/2008 8:32:04 AM PST by dmartin (Not the 'Change' you were 'Hoping' for? Don't blame me. I voted for Palin's running mate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jpl
I was one of the “cheerleaders” I did really think we were going to win.

And it wasn't that much of a clobbering, all things considered (that being the mood of the nation, the media worship of 0bama, and the historic nature of his candidacy, and the fact that McCain was and is a legislatively confused old man).

26 posted on 11/13/2008 8:40:19 AM PST by allmendream (Wealth is EARNED not distributed.... so how could it be Redistributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Wouldn’t that require two more Supreme Court justices?


27 posted on 11/13/2008 8:48:41 AM PST by steve8714 (Keep your hands off my thermostat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
The socialists increased their lead in the House, have at least 57 Senators, and could quite conceivably end up with 59 by the time the counting, recounting, and re-recounting is all said and done.

In other words, they're almost within an eyelash of having total absolute power over the federal government, especially once Obama starts appointing his Supreme Court justices.

The Republicans have absolutely no margin of error at all for the next election. We need to start drawing up a serious battle plan to avoid another catastrophe, or it might be too late.

28 posted on 11/13/2008 9:00:30 AM PST by jpl (Does anybody have seven hundred billion dollars I can borrow?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

McCain engineered his(and our ) defeat with the McCain-Feingold bill and all his reaching across the aisle.By helping stop the Republicans from using the power when they had some,he insured they soon would have much less.


29 posted on 11/13/2008 3:57:16 PM PST by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a creditcard?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

A simple majority of the Senate confirms judicial appointments


30 posted on 11/13/2008 4:12:37 PM PST by MilspecRob (Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MilspecRob

Then how diod the Dems hold up Bush’s appointments to lower courts for the first 6 years of his presidency.

One word... filibuster.


31 posted on 11/14/2008 4:41:47 AM PST by WayneS (HELP! My beloved Commonwealth is becoming MARYLAND!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson