Posted on 10/30/2008 6:37:54 PM PDT by george76
I’m not the best person to explain it (I only mock it), but the way I understand it, the 6,000+ number comes from a literal reading of the Bible, and using its stories of generations of Jews from Adam on to calculate the passage of time from Creation to Christ’s age.
The shard said “Drink your Ovaltine”
Mel Brooks - History of the World - The Prelude.
Um, no.
The site has been established by radiocarbon to date plus or minus 50 years of the date the currently dominant chronology assigns to David; the pottery shard was found in a fill at the site, establishing its own date as presumably older, but by an unknown amount.
Calling the site Davidic begs the central question of the reliability of the current chronology.
Actually, it’s six thousands years or the abouts since the creation of Adam. Not the earth. Since the earth itself was created before Adam, and even the sun, you cannot count the “days” before Adam as “days” as they would appear to Adam (and us), a 24 hr period.
UMMMMMMMmmm no.
It STATES it was at the time of DAVID go to the site posted in #13 and read it.
“What he has found so far has impressed many. Two burned olive pits found at the site have been tested for carbon-14 at Oxford University and were found to date from between 1050 and 970 B.C., exactly when most chronologies place David as king. Two more pits are still to be tested.”
the passage of time from Creation Of Adam to Christ’s age.
One can argue "the time from the creation of the sun, until Christ's age" but the "days" of creation before that cannot be determined as to their length, because the sun did not yet exist so neither could the concept of a 24 hr day.
Also it should be noted that the bible uses different wording in reference to those first "days"
Skeptics attempting to invalidate the Bible by attacking the chronology of Genesis demonstrate only an ignorance of the implications of special relativity.
Twenty-four hours can take as long as one likes, depending on one’s frame of reference. Lawyerly assumptions about the meaning of the text demonstrate only a desire to convict the accused at all costs.
Yes. The article makes an indefensible claim that the site is Davidic because current chronology places David at the same time as the olive pit.
There’s nothing at the site to prove the chronology is correct, just a coincidence of dating with the current understanding. There’s not even anything to prove definitively that the site was indeed Hebrew, and not Canaanitic.
In a few days the'll discover another piece of the same pot with the words "made in China" :o) Then we'll hear all about how the first Jews were actually Chinese immigrants, Not that their carbon dating formula is worthless.
That’s ok, I understand your point of view.
So you are calling some of the best Bible scholars ‘skeptics’?
The time since God’s creation Man is different from Gods the time since the creation of the universe and earth.
The Jews count the years from the creation of Adam.
Actually, many Bible Scholars are skeptics, but that wasn’t my main point.
The chronology of the Patriarchs has to be acknowledged as ahistorical in the modern sense of the word; the creation of a distinction between before-man/after-man chronologies doesn’t by itself protect the Bible from its attackers.
Truth protects the bible from it’s attackers.
Does it say, “Holy mackerel, dig the @ss on that woman”? (Sorry...old joke.)
Yes.
The Bible is true, but Genesis’ chronology is not history in the modern sense of the word.
“Also it should be noted that the bible uses different wording in reference to those first “days”.”
Incorrect. The Hebrew word for Day in Genesis 1 was the same word Moses used for day referring to a 24 hour day.
I found a loose translation!
Twas the night before elections
And all through the town
Tempers were flaring
Emotions all up and down!
I, in my bathrobe
With a cat in my lap
Had cut off the TV
Tired of political crap.
When all of a sudden
There arose such a noise
I peered out of my window
Saw Obama and his boys
They had come for my wallet
They wanted my pay
To give to the others
Who had not worked a day!
He snatched up my money
And quick as a wink
Jumped back on his bandwagon
As I gagged from the stink
He then rallied his henchmen
Who were pulling his cart
I could tell they were out
To tear my country apart!
’ On Fannie, on Freddie,
On Biden and Ayers!
On Acorn, On Pelosi’
He screamed at the pairs!
They took off for his cause
And as he flew out of sight
I heard him laugh at the nation
Who wouldn’t stand up and fight!
So I leave you to think
On this one final note-
IF YOU DON’T WANT SOCIALISM
GET OUT AND VOTE!!!!
Kind regards,
Liberty
You are being very negative. You act like all discoveries have been made. Many archeological discoveries have proven the Bible on a number of occasions. Like the city of Ninevah discovery. All the egghead naysayers like you said the city did not exist. They said the same about Jericho as well. Of course the time line might be in question but the Bible is slowly being proven to be historically acurate, particularly regarding places and general history.
Poo pooers like you are gonna keep on denying facts in the Bible. But so far given time it is slowly being proven by archeology. Why don't you actually think and consider that things that happen in the past if there is physical eveidence can take a long time to find or discover.? Why dont you perhaps keep an open mind and let the research be done before making such idiotic statements?
And another thing. The Arabs and Palestinians to this day claim Jews never had any history in palestine. this discovery refutes that ridiculous belief.
The world needs to catch up to the Bible not the other way around.
The Bible has never been falsified, properly understood; but it is important to remember that it is not either a straightforward history or geology text in the modern senses of those words.
I believe that David did rule around 1000 B.C., and that the Temple was dedicated around 970 B.C.
But these discoveries don’t prove either of those things; they just happen to be the closest thing to physical evidence discovered in the last 2000 years that either of those events happened.
The truth of the Bible is not going to be proven by archaeology: for the skeptical no amount of evidence would suffice, and for the faithful none is necessary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.