Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

On That Double-Secret Obama-Khalidi Tape (WOW!)
Wizbang ^ | 10/29/08 | Steve Schippert

Posted on 10/29/2008 1:38:20 PM PDT by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: Pagey
You're welcome. There are some real nuggets in there. Somebody posted the entire article on another forum which is how I found it by using advanced google, doesn't always work.

You picked a gem of a quote. There were a few in that article. Save it because it may disappear like the Ayers one back in May or so that seems to have although there was a later one that was still up, not as detailed though.

61 posted on 10/29/2008 3:02:02 PM PDT by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: pissant

they’re keeping it in the secret vault with the Michelle “whitey” tape, and his “real” birth certificate, they should all be coming out any day now


62 posted on 10/29/2008 3:06:01 PM PDT by houston1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck

Perhaps someone will come forward and say that they sent the tape (of Obama raping a goat) to the LA Times in order to have Obama exposed, but now the Times double crossed them in order to protect Obama. Who’s to say what the truth is right? The Times would have to release the tape in its entirety to prove them wrong wouldn’t they?


63 posted on 10/29/2008 3:18:54 PM PDT by SampleMan (Community Organizer: What liberals do when they run out of college, before they run out of Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck

Perhaps someone will come forward and say that they sent the tape (of Obama raping a goat) to the LA Times in order to have Obama exposed, but now the Times double crossed them in order to protect Obama. Who’s to say what the truth is right? The Times would have to release the tape in its entirety to prove them wrong wouldn’t they?


64 posted on 10/29/2008 3:18:54 PM PDT by SampleMan (Community Organizer: What liberals do when they run out of college, before they run out of Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: pissant

0 is a Devil Worshipin’, Satanic Inspired - Communist


65 posted on 10/29/2008 3:28:36 PM PDT by Vendome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

We will not see this tape until the election is long over if even then. Freedom is gone in the USA its now a Mediacracy. People will vote for whom ever the news media tells them. Have enough money to buy air time and you can have the White House and rape the nation. These are sad times.


66 posted on 10/29/2008 4:15:07 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear

bttt


67 posted on 10/29/2008 4:17:35 PM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (Obama is the Democrats guy. They bought the ticket, now they must take the ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

The perfect American family doesn’t have a pet either.

He said they would get a dog when they moved into the White House.

Muslims think dogs are dirty.


68 posted on 10/29/2008 4:24:34 PM PDT by Carley (The media understands credentials but does NOT understand principles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Carley

Yeah, right. They’ll get a dog, a cat and a few pot bellied pigs and eat bbq pork rinds.


69 posted on 10/29/2008 4:28:18 PM PDT by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: William_The _Mechanic

Revenge... maybe maybe.


70 posted on 10/29/2008 6:06:35 PM PDT by GOPJ ( Ayers' book "Prairie Fire" was dedicated to the assassin Sirhan Sirhan - killer of Robert Kennedy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I wonder when this tipster saw the video. Recently? Or some time ago?


71 posted on 10/29/2008 6:08:52 PM PDT by comps4spice (Democrats caused the current financial mess. Do we really want to give them the Oval Office?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
The question came up after WWII ~ Hitler and the Nazis didn't appear to be concerned with whether or not someone they thought of as a Jew was devout, so, in that light, who might a Jew be?

It was pretty obvious the Law of Moses wasn't sufficient to deter the Nazis (if your mother didn't happen to be Jewish but your father was, they'd kill you anyway). At the same time it really wasn't found suitible to allow the Nazis to decide such a question.

Moslems don't seem to be bothered by either the Law of Moses or the degree of piety ~ pretty much like the Nazis.

I'd suggest that Mr. Zell is as much at risk as any Jew ever was for being murdered for his membership in this group. He should act to reveal the antisemites so that people have at least a fighting chance.

72 posted on 10/29/2008 6:17:57 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: pissant
The Times is now saying they can't release the tapes b/c they agreed to not release the tapes publicly. The deal was made w/ the party that gave them the tapes. I don't believe them, but, let's just say they're telling the truth.

Why not have a few parties from both sides come in & review the tapes & then release a transcript of the tapes. That way the Times is able to keep their “journalistic integrity”, ahem, by not releasing the tapes, & the truth of what's in these tapes can come out. There's obviously no deal about revealing the content of the tapes b/c the times revealed some of that content when they wrote the article in April.

If the Times really believes in journalistic integrity, they will do this. The odds of them doing this? 0%

73 posted on 10/29/2008 6:42:46 PM PDT by Reno232
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Where’s the entrepreneurial spirit? There must be SOMEONE with access to a copy of this video who can put it on E-Bay, hold a 24 hour auction, and walk away with millions of $$.

Only problem is that it would be the Obama campaign that would be sure to out-bid everyone else.

So why can’t someone just release the damned tape???


74 posted on 10/29/2008 10:05:58 PM PDT by Enchante (The real "bitter clingers" are on the LEFT -- ranting Obamabots clinging to delusions!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2; newnhdad; jrooney

Come on fellas think for a few minutes. Nobody knew about this story before the LA Times reported it, Nobody knew about the tape before the LA Times reported it, Nobody would have been able to even speculate about what was on the tape before the LA Times reported it.

Really, if the LA Times was in the tank for Obama they would have suppressed the entire story until Jan 21st, 2009. If there was something really damaging they would have destroyed the tapes.

We are looking like fools, we’ve got a war going against Islamic fascism, we have Iran making inroads into Iraq, Russia is starting to use economic blackmail, our economy is imploding and the big issue of the day is a stupid party for a professor? We are going to get our asses handed to us on election day because the rest of America just doesn’t care about this nonsense.


75 posted on 10/30/2008 7:28:32 AM PDT by Philly Nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson