Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If McCain loses, what next for conservatives?
Reuters ^ | Oct 26, 2008 | Ed Stoddard

Posted on 10/26/2008 7:57:44 AM PDT by TheNewPundit

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-196 next last
To: TheNewPundit
The future of the Republican party, if it wants to have a future, win or lose (and we ARE going to win) is Gov. Sarah Palin.

If McCainiacs (Romneybots, Hucaboobs, and CountryClubbers, etc) try to blame Palin for the loss (assuming there is one) they don't have a firm grip on reality. The only reason the race is this close is Gov. Sarah Palin.

61 posted on 10/26/2008 8:28:55 AM PDT by allmendream (White Dog Democrat: A Democrat who will not vote for 0bama because he's black.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood
We either must reinvigorate the Republican Party and the Conservative Principles it one stood for.

We need Conservative people who truly believe in the principles of their convictions.

If this means a few years 'wandering in the wilderness", then so be it. Remember, despite all the lying media, the finger pointing of the unpatriotic opposition and weak willed public, it is the GOP's abandonment of it's core beliefs that got us in trouble.

If ours is the right path(individualism, small government, responsibility, etc.) and socialism is doomed to failure, people will see this eventually and the GOP will be back in power.

Hold on to your seats in the meanwhile.
62 posted on 10/26/2008 8:29:30 AM PDT by RedMonqey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cedric
I already voted for McCain-Palin.

That doesn't mean I'm not going to look for conservatives to vote for in the future.

So, stuff it!

63 posted on 10/26/2008 8:30:33 AM PDT by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia
I presume to (futilely) lecture weenies who choose to live in a Utopian future rather that fight and win the battle at hand.
64 posted on 10/26/2008 8:31:01 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPundit

I thought we all agreed to never post a reuters’ story on this site?

JoMa


65 posted on 10/26/2008 8:31:48 AM PDT by joma89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

Which describes whom exactly?


66 posted on 10/26/2008 8:32:32 AM PDT by PajamaTruthMafia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: sonic109
Where do we start folks?

That's the key question but it's best addressed after the election. Then I think you'll hear lots of ideas.

67 posted on 10/26/2008 8:33:53 AM PDT by PajamaTruthMafia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia

Everyone except me.


68 posted on 10/26/2008 8:33:59 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: bushinohio
Narrow foundation of Christian conservatives my a@@!

There will be plenty of blame to go around, and plenty of time to pass it out. You socons need to own up to your share.

Which is, as I see it: You are not a majority. Not even close. The maximum national socon vote is no more than 30%, probably closer to 15-20%. This is reflected in statewide races, for which the US Senate seats are a useful marker. There are essentially no socons in the US Senate.

You ARE essential to any non-Democrat victory. No Republican can be elected without you.

However, this does not mean that you can get everything you want. You have some issues which are popular, or can be made popular. You have other issues which can be used to rally 70% of the people against you.

Sometime in the last six years, you have decided to emphasize the issues which most of the people oppose. I realize, from many discussions here and elsewhere, that you regard this as taking a moral stand which transcends politics. Some socons take the view that, as long as they are right, they should stand for and advocate for unpopular causes. Under some circumstances, I agree with this.

But it's going too far to set a litmus test for a Republican Presidential or Senatorial candidate that they endorse your least popular ideas. Yes, you can destroy any candidate who won't do this. But the fact that you have the power to do so does not make it wise to exercise that power.

As I said, we will have four long years to go over this debacle.

But no member of the 1994 coalition is without fault, and we all need to start by owning up to our own failings.

69 posted on 10/26/2008 8:34:56 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Tyranny, like Hell, is not easily conquered...the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stevem

I agree completely, although I don’t think it should be in an entirely conservative context. I think our goal should be freedom, prosperity (opportunity), and security (this includes from criminals and interlopers as well as foreign enemies). Our success in achieving these goals will depend on the character of our citizens, if we have become immoral and lazy we can not succeed.


70 posted on 10/26/2008 8:35:13 AM PDT by Peter Horry (Mount Up Everybody and Ride to the Sound of the Guns .. Pat Buchanan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

Nice to see you hold yourself in such high esteem.


71 posted on 10/26/2008 8:35:22 AM PDT by PajamaTruthMafia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: HelloooClareece

At least that will be sweet! I say the party needs to get more conservative, certainly not less.


72 posted on 10/26/2008 8:35:45 AM PDT by bushinohio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Peter Horry

I don’t believe the people of this country do know the truth. Smooth talkers can make their point stick in a persons mind. BHO is influental in his speech. This country has been sucked into to blaming the Bush Admin for everything that is wrong in the world. We are becoming a hateful nation and it will increase if BHO becomes POTUS.
The entire Democratic Left need to be exposed Now.


73 posted on 10/26/2008 8:36:50 AM PDT by conservative_cyclist (doodan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPundit

If McCain loses, you won’t see another free election until after our next civil war.


74 posted on 10/26/2008 8:36:56 AM PDT by Noumenon (Time for Atlas to shrug - and to pick up a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPundit

McCain WINS what next for conservatives...


75 posted on 10/26/2008 8:37:08 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood
where the Principles of Conservatism espoused by Buckley, Goldwater, and Reagan can guide us.

Buckley and Goldwater couldn't get elected.

Reagan was elected with a broad coalition which included RINOs and moderate centrists.

Without those RINOs and centrists, you haven't got a prayer of winning a national election - not ever.

76 posted on 10/26/2008 8:37:31 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Tyranny, like Hell, is not easily conquered...the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: geege

I believe he’s doom and gloom because he is as isolated as are most who live in media centers. He hears nothing but Obama propaganda all day, and despite the best of intentions he has allowed this drivel to effect him.


77 posted on 10/26/2008 8:37:47 AM PDT by quadrant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: quadrant
Watch the opposition carefully; sooner or later, they'll go too far and make a mistake. They can't help it.

Exactly. The socialists of the Democratic party will misread their "victory" as an endorsement of their ideas and not the rejection of Bushes failed policies, which mirrored their own ideas in many ways.

Watch for their exploding spending(which they blamed on Bush) And increasing taxes, increasing debt despite increasing taxes, businesses going under, cuts in the military, inviting our enemies to action., legalizing millions of illegals.

If we only do the exact opposite of their plans we will be back in 2010, and the presidency in 2012.
78 posted on 10/26/2008 8:38:39 AM PDT by RedMonqey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: twhitak

I suppose “Barack Hussein” will tap the Franklin Raines talent at cooking the books in order to make the books indicate whatever he wants to them to show. As in, “pay no attention to the markets, just believe us” - “pay no attention to your lying eyes and ears, it is still (after four years) ALL BUSH’S FAULT.”


79 posted on 10/26/2008 8:38:44 AM PDT by Twinkie (Democratic Party = Communist Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPundit; LucyT

If Obama wins this election, he will so change the face of the Republic that conservatives will be a footnote. There will be no “regrouping”. One of the first things on the Obama agenda and agenda of his veto proof/filabuster proof Congress will be to reinstitute the “Fairness Doctrine”. It will be a very different climate with the continued dismanteling of the First Amendment, then the next to go will be the Second Amendment.

The people have spoken and they want Socialism. They’ve been successfully indoctinated and their perception of reality has been changed, just as Yuri Bezmenov describes.

Check out the series on YouTube: Yuri Bezmenov

There are about 58 videos of this former KGB agent who defected. The linked video has him describing what the KGB specalized in 85% of the time: “ideological subversion” or “active measures” - psy ops.

The link is titled “Bezmenov on demoralization in America”. In fact, everyone should download these videos to some permanent format because they won’t remain posted for long.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlpODYhnPEo


80 posted on 10/26/2008 8:39:15 AM PDT by FrdmLvr (What fresh hell is this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson