Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Palin softened her rhetoric - Shift, in Henderson, to message aimed at women reflects polling
Las Vegas Sun ^ | Wed, Oct 22, 2008 (2:42 p.m.) | J. Patrick Coolican

Posted on 10/23/2008 1:53:36 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: MoreGovLess
Because voting for a kleptocrat makes you complicit in your own tyranny: it puts the handcuffs on your hands.

If a third party candidate is wildly successful and pulls 10% of the vote in the red and battleground states, who will take office on January 20, 2009?

Who will become commander in chief?

Who will appoint 2-3 Supremes in his first term?

Who will sign the Freedom of Choice Act as his first official action?

And you really think enabling that leaves your hands free or clean?

If you don’t get it, I’m sorry. It’s called integrity

Wrong. It's called arrogance. It's saying that one is too good to worry about the real world consequences of ones vote. Even if McCain were a liberal, I don't have any less integrity than you because I want FDR instead of Carter (heck, FDR instead of Lenin!), or because I would rather have a pro-lifer appointing judges than the most radical pro-abort to ever run for this office. The fact that you even think you are somehow on a higher moral plane than those who care what happens to real babies, real soldiers and real taxpayers for the next four years is breathtakingly silly.

BTW, who do you plan to vote for? If you're doing anything other than writing in George Washington's name, you're a hypocrite.

Besides, do you really think McCain is a conservative? Come on!

Since you have rejected Reagan as a supporter of "kleptocrats" who would choose Herod over Jesus, I don't think you're remotely qualified to decide who is and isn't conservative.

41 posted on 10/28/2008 1:26:52 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (*******It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.******)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

If the GOP had integrity, it’d still be in power. Sorry you cannot see that. I wish you and your fellow GOP partisans a nice exile and hope you learn something from it. Somehow I doubt it


42 posted on 10/29/2008 12:31:42 PM PDT by MoreGovLess (The USA has one main political party: the Kleptocrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: MoreGovLess

You sir, are an intellectual coward who cannot defend his ideas when questioned. Go hide under your desk, suck your thumb and claim strength of character, the rest of us will do your fighting for you.


43 posted on 10/29/2008 2:38:48 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (*******It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.******)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

Ah, the clarity of your arguments has won me over /s


44 posted on 11/03/2008 6:09:21 AM PST by MoreGovLess (The USA has one main political party: the Kleptocrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MoreGovLess

Actually, you have nothing to complain about when it comes to my tone, becaused you ignored my clear arguments and wouldn’t defend your ideas even when asked specific questions. You’re still an intellectual coward. You can still go hide under your desk and suck your thumb and claim strength of character, the rest of us will do your fighting for you.


45 posted on 11/03/2008 7:23:57 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (*******It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.******)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Digger

“I hope some speech writer was responsible for that statement.”

Maybe... but I believe she’s said it before in other venues, and agrees with it.


46 posted on 11/03/2008 7:29:45 AM PST by MayflowerMadam ("the pacifist is as surely a traitor ... as is the most brutal wrongdoer" T. Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

what’s your name, so I can write you in for Prez?


47 posted on 11/03/2008 8:00:06 AM PST by MoreGovLess (The USA has one main political party: the Kleptocrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MoreGovLess

Unlike Senator McCain, I’m not qualified to be President.

However, if you insist, just write in “Mr. Silverback.” Your vote will be thrown out, but you’ll still be helping to elect Obama just as much as if you stayed home or voted for Bob Barr.

Well heck, now that I think about it, you could just write in “Senator Soiled Utility Room” and maybe they’d count it for Obama.

Hey, before you go back under your desk, why don’t you watch the video on the front page of this website:

www.durarealidad.com

Of course, I doubt you have the stuff to get through it, but make the attempt, OK? And then you can come back and tell me how voting for McCain is so far beneath your exalted moral plane.


48 posted on 11/03/2008 8:14:40 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (*******It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.******)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

I’ll write in “Senator Supporter for Socialist take-over of Finance” and see who gets the vote.


49 posted on 11/03/2008 8:26:46 AM PST by MoreGovLess (The USA has one main political party: the Kleptocrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: MoreGovLess
Did you watch the video, or are you too much of a coward?
50 posted on 11/03/2008 8:38:26 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (*******It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.******)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

Gruesome.
I’ve said, I can see single issue voters (pro-life) maybe being for McCain , although I’m not sure what that’ll change. Having the GOP in the White House 20/28 years hasn’t changed anything. The SCOTUS is just as chicken sh!t as the other branches.

McCain has also recently said he has no litmus test for SCOTUS nominees. he also said in 2000 does not support the overturn of Roe v Wade (he has flop-flopped since)

So how is he the savior? You really trust this guy?


51 posted on 11/03/2008 9:01:45 AM PST by MoreGovLess (The USA has one main political party: the Kleptocrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

I will answer your questions since you asked so nicely
Who will become commander in chief?
A: a kleptocrat

Who will appoint 2-3 Supremes in his first term?
A: a kleptocrat

Who will sign the Freedom of Choice Act as his first official action?
A: the candididate of the left pocket of kleptocracy (and what will this change anyway?)

And you really think enabling that leaves your hands free or clean?

A: at least I voted for what I want instead of what I didn;t want


52 posted on 11/03/2008 11:12:25 AM PST by MoreGovLess (The USA has one main political party: the Kleptocrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: MoreGovLess

Barack Obama has a 100% NARAL record.

He is co-sponsor of a bill that will force doctors and hosptials to participate against their will in the carnage you watched. It would also invalidate every state restriction on abortion, such as parental notification, waiting periods, etc. He has pledged to sign that bill as his first presidential act.

He wants to use American tax dollars—your tax dollars—to fund abortions.

After two decades in the pro-life movement, I have only seen one politician who has voted in support of actual infanticide. That politician is Barack Hussein Obama.

And you ask me if the alternative is good enough. Just go back under your desk. I’ll fight for the little kids for you, too.


53 posted on 11/03/2008 1:22:25 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (*******It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.******)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: MoreGovLess

No, while your answer would be technically correct if the instructor accepted you benighted point of view, the correct answers are below:

Who will become commander in chief?
A: Barack Hussein Obama, who has pledged to slash our military, has already tried to legislate defeat in Iraq and says we’re doing nothing but carpet bomb villages in Afghanistan.

Who will appoint 2-3 Supremes in his first term?
A: Barack Hussein Obama, a disciple of Bill Ayers, ACORN and Jeremiah Wright who has said the Warren court should have redistributed wealth by judicial fiat.

Who will sign the Freedom of Choice Act as his first official action?
A: Barack Hussein Obama, who believes that doctors should be forced to perform abortions and you should be forced to pay for them.

But don’t worry, you just go whine and we’ll keep doing the fighting. That doesn’t look likely to change, either.


54 posted on 11/03/2008 1:31:27 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (*******It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.******)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

your fight for the kids ends at birth: under your kleptocrat McCain, they’ll be born with more and more debt every year
I’ll be trying to keep them above water

No wonder the GOP will going to lose, with supporters who won’t make them accountable


55 posted on 11/03/2008 1:37:52 PM PST by MoreGovLess (The USA has one main political party: the Kleptocrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: MoreGovLess
I’ll be trying to keep them above water

How? By throwing your vote down a hole? By pretending that a guy appointing radical judges who'll run the federal judiciary for a generation is going to help the financial situation of this country? Call me and tell me how much you cared for those kids when they're getting indoctrinated, buggered and oppressed because of judges Obama puts in place.

Hang it up, you're not fooling anyone, it's all about ego for you. "I'm too good and smart to vote for those guys." And for sure you can stop pretending you little spaz vote tomorrow is "fighting" for anything.

All hat and no cattle. Hang up the hat and go back under your desk.

56 posted on 11/03/2008 3:21:58 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (*******It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.******)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

I’m not sure what you need more: decaf or Viagra


57 posted on 11/03/2008 3:43:44 PM PST by MoreGovLess (The USA has one main political party: the Kleptocrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: MoreGovLess
Fortunately, I know what you need:


58 posted on 11/03/2008 8:58:14 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (*******It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.******)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

funny one! have a good election day; we are blessed to live in a free country be able to vote


59 posted on 11/04/2008 5:15:45 AM PST by MoreGovLess (The USA has one main political party: the Kleptocrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson