Brunner Disallows Mismatch Challenges; Voters With Unmatched/Bad/Fictitious Information Get to Vote

Columbus Dispatch via ACE OF SPADES HQ ^ | October 23, 2008 | Ace

[JimRed]

It means that it must be validated at some point. We have these in every election.

Yes, we do. I've worked on a district board for many years and if a voter is not in the books or has a different address on record within the district we provide a provisional ballot. The county board then verifies them before the vote is counted.

My concern is that in some of these RAT dominated counties the "verification" will be automatic for RAT voters, regardless of the facts.

[nclaurel]

The article cited did not mention provisional ballot. It said that only poll workers can challenge the eligibility and that they have not been given the criteria to do so. It doesn’t seem hysteria to say that the election is being stolen if no one has knowledge of which ballots don't meet standards and should have been challenged.

[JimRed]

As I've said on another thread, there are but 3 boxes that grant us freedom; the ballot box, the soap box, and the ammo box. They already own the soap box (the left wing media), and they're stealing the ballot box as we speak (ACORN, motor voter, etc). We're quickly running out of options.

Amen, and a big BUMP!

[LS]

I know. Working on this now.

[LS]

Yes. But the other posters are right. This is a screw up: the OH GOP is working on this now. I offered to be the “citizen” who brought the suit. There is something in the works, but I’m not that high up the food chain to know exactly what.