Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are YOU SMARTER THAN a 7th Grader? VANITY
www.freerepublic.com ^ | 10/15/08 | Me

Posted on 10/16/2008 4:54:29 PM PDT by goodnesswins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Help me freepers....I'm sending this out to friends/relatives soon....help me finish/improve it. Thanks.
1 posted on 10/16/2008 4:54:29 PM PDT by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

No, but I’m wiser.


2 posted on 10/16/2008 4:57:46 PM PDT by refermech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins; nutmeg; MudPuppy; tet68; kristinn; Doctor Raoul; Dutchy; StarFan; AnnaZ; ...

this is HILARIOUS...and sad just the same!!


3 posted on 10/16/2008 4:58:47 PM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty; The Pendleton 8: We are not going down without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

Right now my husband owns a small business with 2 employees and the gross is under 250K...

Why the HE** should we expand, hire, and place ourselves in a higher bracket so Obambi can share OUR WEALTH?


4 posted on 10/16/2008 4:59:33 PM PDT by Mrs.Z ("...you're a Democrat. You're expected to complain and offer no solutions." Denny Crane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
(Obama has stated no one who “makes” over $250,000 will see an increase in taxes.)

I thought he said no one who makes under $250k will see a tax increase.
5 posted on 10/16/2008 5:00:33 PM PDT by randomhero97 ("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randomhero97

AAHGGGH...you’re right! Have to change that....


6 posted on 10/16/2008 5:05:12 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Socialism is great until you run out of someone else's money (M. Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

Question: If Obama increases taxes on businesses, what happens to the price of iPods, video games, clothes and the other things businesses make or sell? Who will pay those higher prices? Who does Obama really tax?

Answer: Prices will go up. Everyone who buys those things will pay the higher prices. Obama’s corporate tax hikes are tax increases on everyone, even if they make less than $250k per year, even if they’re 7th graders.


7 posted on 10/16/2008 6:21:43 PM PDT by javachip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: javachip

Thanks....that’s probably better than my attempt....I’ll use it!


8 posted on 10/16/2008 6:32:34 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Socialism is great until you run out of someone else's money (M. Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

Just an accounting review example for question #1.

Income Statement

Sales 2,000,000
Cost of Goods Sold 1,000,000
Gross Profit 1,000,000
Selling/Ad. Expense (Salaries, Incl. owner) 519,000
Depreciation Expense 200,000
Operating Income 281,000
Interest Expense 100,000
Earnings BEFORE Taxes 181,000
Taxes 63,350
Earnings After Taxes 117,650
Dividends to Shareholders 0
Retained Earnings 117,650

Just to correct question #1, the owner does not pay taxes until after he has deducted his operating expenses (overhead, cost of products sold, salaries to employees, salary to himself, depreciation of equipment, and interest on loans). So, he really only gets taxed on 181,000 of income, not the 2,000,000 of his gross sales. So, as long as he and none of his employees makes more than 250,000 during the year, then their taxes won’t increase.

I gave the owner a salary of 249,000, the workers 45,000, and taxed the Earn. before taxes at 35 percent. If the owner did not want to pay taxes twice, he could do one of the following:

1. Give himself a higher salary and then pay more in personal income taxes under Obama’s plan.

2. Increase his employee’s salaries (to roughly 77,000 each) so the company’s earnings would equal 0. Like option 1, this would leave no retained earnings for the company. Likely the owner would rather have the money for himself or his company rather than give it to his employees.

3. Minimize his tax payment by balancing salaries with company income. For example, he may find that taking a salary of 249,000 and then having the company pay 35 percent on 181,000 and keeping the retained earnings is cheaper than taking a salary of 430,000 for himself and leaving no money for the company to be taxed on.

I wrote this fast, so if my numbers are off or whatever, sorry, I was just trying to clarify the accounting to show that he doesn’t get taxed on the money that he pays to his employees. That is an expense that is written off before he pays taxes.


9 posted on 10/16/2008 8:07:35 PM PDT by Skenderbej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skenderbej

Do we know whether Obama’s tax is BEFORE expenses or AFTER????


10 posted on 10/16/2008 8:08:53 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Socialism is great until you run out of someone else's money (M. Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

Taxes come after expenses. That’s according to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and is not subject to Obama’s influence unless he somehow becomes the singular dictator and changes the way the best accountants have been doing accounting since the Great Depression. As a matter of fact, GAAP came about because of the fraud in accounting prior to the G.D.. If GAAP changes, it is likely to be more strict, but expenses will never be taxed, it doesn’t make sense and Obama can’t change that.


11 posted on 10/16/2008 8:23:03 PM PDT by Skenderbej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Skenderbej

Thanks....I really did KNOW that....but, in my hurry, didn’t remember.....That’s why I posted this - for FREEPERS to correct me...thanks again.


12 posted on 10/16/2008 8:24:55 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Socialism is great until you run out of someone else's money (M. Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Skenderbej

But, I just thought of something....7th Graders do NOT know that....LOL!!!


13 posted on 10/16/2008 8:25:25 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Socialism is great until you run out of someone else's money (M. Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

True. Unfortunately, neither do most adults. My wife got her B.A. and her Master’s without having to take a single economics or math class. The fact that she took over 200 undergrad/grad credit hours without a single math or basic econ class blows my mind (double major of music/art, master’s of secondary ed.). They should at least make these artist/music majors take some business classes so they can learn how to market their talents and run a business IMO.


14 posted on 10/16/2008 8:32:34 PM PDT by Skenderbej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

And since at least 50 percent of voters think Obama’s tax plan is great, we know that at least 50 percent of adults don’t understand any business at all. Senator Government can finance his huge government programs by increasing income (taxes), debt financing (federal deficit), or cutting expenses (eliminate gov. programs). He has declared he can cut taxes, lower the federal deficit, and increase government spending all at the same time. This is impossible and preposterous, yet for some reason people believe him! We are in a sad state!


15 posted on 10/16/2008 8:38:08 PM PDT by Skenderbej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Skenderbej

Hmmm. A guy on the radio said today that Obama’s jump from 36% to 39% in taxation rate for “Joe” was really 8.5%, I think he said, rather than only 3%. What am I missing here? Is that correct, and if so, I’m more tired than I thought.


16 posted on 10/16/2008 8:49:56 PM PDT by Mjaye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Skenderbej

Aside: Without the math classes, she didn’t get much science, either? No wonder the AGW/GCC scam is so easily perpetrated.

[Note: ~130 semester-hours, and no music courses. *<];-)]


17 posted on 10/16/2008 10:33:20 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The Great Obamanation of Desolation, attempting to sit in the Oval Office, where he ought not..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mjaye

8.3% increase in tax paid is correct. Increase in rate is 3%

Now: 36% on $100 = $36 tax paid
BHO: 39% on $100 = $39 tax paid

increase = 39-36 = $3 increase in dollars paid

$3/$36 X 100 = 8.333% increase in amount paid


18 posted on 10/16/2008 10:40:27 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The Great Obamanation of Desolation, attempting to sit in the Oval Office, where he ought not..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch

Freshman biology and Physical Science were her two science classes. Neither require more than basic math.


19 posted on 10/16/2008 11:25:21 PM PDT by Skenderbej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Skenderbej

That seems pretty typical any more.

To even qualify for admission when I graduated, we had to have three years English/literature (four recommended); math through Algebra II, with either 1 semester of trig or prob & stats, and 1 semester ‘elemetary’ functions recommended; 2 years of a foriegn language; 4 years of P.E., which meant dressing out nearly every day; 1 year each of general science, biology, & either chemistry or physics—both recommended. “Citizenship”; US history; world history; civics.

Didn’t leave much room for HS electives; BUT the state college & university system also required 2 years of college math; at least one each of a physical and a life science, at least one of which included a lab; and a lot of other general ed for any BS and most BA’s, though for a BA the math was only one year. For a science major, the general ed science classes didn’t count, but were extra.

The libs have watered it heavily, and have moved most requirements to the ‘soft side’ of the campus.

Students and young grads today are not prepared to effective refute the Gores and Hansons and Obamas of the world, let alone point and laugh them into oblivion.


20 posted on 10/17/2008 12:25:01 AM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The Great Obamanation of Desolation, attempting to sit in the Oval Office, where he ought not..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson