Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don't Sell Short Selling Short (In Defense of Short Selling)
Mises.org ^ | 4/6/2007 | Gary Galles

Posted on 10/09/2008 5:58:29 PM PDT by arista

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 10/09/2008 5:58:29 PM PDT by arista
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: arista

I do not have a problem with them selling short...Just post their real name.... Let’s see who has the balls to stand behind their position!!!


2 posted on 10/09/2008 6:01:43 PM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arista

I want the right price, not the bubble price. We’d have a lot more bubbles without short sales.


3 posted on 10/09/2008 6:01:49 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Betcha they're good. Why shouldn't they be? Their one mistake was giving up me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arista

Okay, I won’t sell my shorts.

But should I launder them before I sell them?


4 posted on 10/09/2008 6:03:21 PM PDT by Old Sarge (Illic Est Haud Deus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arista

I disagree. No clandestine group should be allowed to use investors’ accounts to scare herds of other investors and sink competitors’ businesses. IMO, the uptick rule and watchers are needed.


5 posted on 10/09/2008 6:04:01 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-'96, Noachide computer geek)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pointsal

Dollars are anonymous, and the market price is the only information you need. I don’t see what difference publishing names would make.


6 posted on 10/09/2008 6:04:27 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

I think publishing names would be a violation of people’s financial privacy. It would be just as bad as publishing every credit card transaction.


7 posted on 10/09/2008 6:07:03 PM PDT by arista
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: familyop

I understand the concern, but restricting short-selling is very much a way of saying you support “the free market,” except when you don’t like its outcomes...


8 posted on 10/09/2008 6:14:01 PM PDT by seacapn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pointsal

dartuser is short the Russell 2000.


9 posted on 10/09/2008 6:19:06 PM PDT by dartuser ("If you torture the data long enough, it will confess, even to crimes it did not commit")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: familyop

the watchers are those who go long on those same stocks


10 posted on 10/09/2008 6:21:31 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Betcha they're good. Why shouldn't they be? Their one mistake was giving up me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

sounds just like how freddie mac works. privatized profits and socialized risks


11 posted on 10/09/2008 6:22:59 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Betcha they're good. Why shouldn't they be? Their one mistake was giving up me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: arista

Short selling is nothing but selling the same shares twice. Yes they do buy them back, but only after they artificially inflate the float, which drives the stock down. Its a myth that they help the market. Did anyone ever meet a short seller that wanted the market or stock that they sell short to go up? I didn’t think so.


12 posted on 10/09/2008 6:26:37 PM PDT by Racer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Racer1

Name me one market where all parties wanted the price to go up. Every seller is hoping that he is selling at a peak, every buyer is betting that he is buying at a valley. This is how markets work.


13 posted on 10/09/2008 6:32:21 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: familyop; seacapn
Further to seacapn — the uptick rule accomplished a lot less than you'd imagine. There's always an uptick.
14 posted on 10/09/2008 6:34:03 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Racer1

Shorts do not sell the same shares twice, they borrow them from someone who actually owns them to sell. They do not affect the float in any way since the shares have to be there to borrow.
Short provide liquidity to the market and trust me when the stock/market is tanking shorts can provide ‘brakes’ when they all start buying to cover.
Yes I am a proud shorter. I prefer it to long any day.


15 posted on 10/09/2008 6:41:11 PM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sheana

“Shorts do not sell the same shares twice, they borrow them from someone who actually owns them to sell.”

Well that’s all well and good - but the problem is NAKED short selling.

If you can keep selling, and dry up all the buy orders WITHOUT REGARD TO WHETHER OR NOT YOUR BROKER HAS THE SHARES TO LEND, OR IF INDEED THEY REALLY EXIST, you see the market drop 700 points today.

When FTC, or Failure To Cover, goes unrecognized and unpunished - shorts run wild.


16 posted on 10/09/2008 6:49:21 PM PDT by StatenIsland (The '08 Election: It's about the survival of our country, not making a point...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: seacapn
"I understand the concern, but restricting short-selling is very much a way of saying you support “the free market,” except when you don’t like its outcomes..."

It can be used for conspiracies to vandalize stocks and essentially steal from other investors. It's about as moral and free-market-worthy as using false environmentalist front-witches in commissioners' meetings to stop competitors' projects from starting, IMO.

But that won't matter much for the near future. Investment banking is going to China now. We'll see how the PLA deals with disruptions. Me...? I'll put my tiny little bits in deposit banks and do the building myself.


17 posted on 10/09/2008 6:49:31 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

If you can keep selling, and dry up all the buy orders WITHOUT REGARD TO WHETHER OR NOT YOUR BROKER HAS THE SHARES TO LEND, OR IF INDEED THEY REALLY EXIST, you see the market drop 700 points today.

I traded stocks for 5 yrs, mostly shorting. I couldn’t tell you how many times I pushed that button and was told....no shares available. If the broker doesn’t have the shares to lend you don’t get them! sheesh


18 posted on 10/09/2008 6:53:30 PM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
"the watchers are those who go long on those same stocks"

That's true. Anyway, we're looking at some big changes ahead. We'll be a Nation of savers and builders, or else...

It will be very interesting to watch investment banking in China during the coming years. One difference there is the savings culture. We'll see if that holds up after the present building of infrastructure, when heavy consumerism will be happening there.


19 posted on 10/09/2008 6:56:18 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

We might be talking about two different kinds and purposes of short-selling, BTW. I’m referring to pre-planned and coordinated group efforts that are executed only for the purpose of driving competitors’ stocks or natural resource commodities down.


20 posted on 10/09/2008 7:01:40 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson