Skip to comments.
Catholic Magazine Calls For Defeat And Removal Of Prime Minister Harper (Canada)
LifeSiteNews ^
| 10/2/08
| LifeSiteNews
Posted on 10/02/2008 4:29:08 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
"For Mr. Harper to state that he would not personally support a law limiting abortion is one thing," said de Valk. "But to go so far as to strong arm his own MPs from supporting the right to life and even, as his spokesperson suggested, whip his cabinet on the matter, is unconscionable." It is an insult to democracy.
1
posted on
10/02/2008 4:29:08 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; 8mmMauser; NYer; Salvation; Pyro7480
2
posted on
10/02/2008 4:30:09 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
3
posted on
10/02/2008 4:30:43 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
Don’t get caught up on the tactics; the fact is he is an opponent of life and that itself needs to be addressed.
4
posted on
10/02/2008 4:30:57 PM PDT
by
mbraynard
(You are the Republican Party. See you at the precinct meeting.)
To: GMMAC; fanfan
5
posted on
10/02/2008 4:31:12 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
and the liberals are better?
6
posted on
10/02/2008 4:34:11 PM PDT
by
ari-freedom
(Obama is snore-y and stinky)
To: mbraynard
7
posted on
10/02/2008 4:34:37 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: ari-freedom
Of course not, but a REAL conservative Prime Minister would be better.
8
posted on
10/02/2008 4:35:30 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: ari-freedom
9
posted on
10/02/2008 4:39:26 PM PDT
by
RKV
(He who has the guns makes the rules)
To: wagglebee
10
posted on
10/02/2008 4:41:18 PM PDT
by
ari-freedom
(Obama is snore-y and stinky)
To: wagglebee; GMMAC; Clive; exg; kanawa; backhoe; -YYZ-; Former Proud Canadian; Squawk 8888; ...
Yeah, because the Liberals would protect the unborn./sarc
11
posted on
10/02/2008 4:41:44 PM PDT
by
fanfan
(SCC:Canadians have constitutional protection to all opinions, as long as they are based on the facts)
To: ari-freedom; GMMAC; fanfan
There ARE real conservatives in Canada.
12
posted on
10/02/2008 4:43:37 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
I know.
I am one.
But not voting for Harper won’t solve anything.
13
posted on
10/02/2008 4:44:59 PM PDT
by
fanfan
(SCC:Canadians have constitutional protection to all opinions, as long as they are based on the facts)
To: fanfan
But not voting for Harper won’t solve anything. I assume that the Canadian parliament works essentially the same as Great Britain's. Are most of the other Conservative MPs pro-life? If so, could pressure be brought to either remove Harper or force Harper to allow debate?
14
posted on
10/02/2008 4:48:53 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
There will be no pressure to remove him. He is the best thing to happen to Canada, and the Conservative party in a long time.
Could we force Harper to allow a debate on it?
Yes, if he gets a majority.
15
posted on
10/02/2008 4:55:08 PM PDT
by
fanfan
(SCC:Canadians have constitutional protection to all opinions, as long as they are based on the facts)
To: fanfan
Could we force Harper to allow a debate on it?
Yes, if he gets a majority. Then that should happen, to deny debate is an affront to democracy.
16
posted on
10/02/2008 4:58:42 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
I fail to see the logic in defeating someone who will just leave abortion as it is and allow people who still want to legalize pot, raise taxes, and who knows what else.
You’ve got to evaluate the whole package, relative to the alternatives. Harper isn’t perfect but he is way ahead of the others.
17
posted on
10/02/2008 5:18:09 PM PDT
by
Grig
To: wagglebee
Then that should happen, to deny debate is an affront to democracy.And over such an important subject.
But if we move too fast, we will lose any chance at all. I don't want to lose that chance, and Stephen Harper is the best hope we have.
Now, if Sarah Palin wanted to run here, I would drop Steve in a 'mothers second'. :-)
18
posted on
10/02/2008 5:23:49 PM PDT
by
fanfan
(SCC:Canadians have constitutional protection to all opinions, as long as they are based on the facts)
To: Grig
Hi Grig.
Are you working the election this time?
19
posted on
10/02/2008 5:25:36 PM PDT
by
fanfan
(SCC:Canadians have constitutional protection to all opinions, as long as they are based on the facts)
To: Grig
My question is whether there are other Conservatives who would be preferable to Harper.
20
posted on
10/02/2008 5:28:17 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson