Skip to comments.
Warning Sounded on Web’s Future
Blue Marble Climate ^
| September 17, 2008
| John Nicklin
Posted on 09/21/2008 12:22:44 PM PDT by Delacon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Consider the ramification of sites like Climate Audit and Watts Up With That being rated as untrustworthy because they challenge the consensus.
1
posted on
09/21/2008 12:22:44 PM PDT
by
Delacon
To: steelyourfaith; Entrepreneur; Beowulf; CygnusXI; Defendingliberty; WL-law; Genesis defender; ...
2
posted on
09/21/2008 12:23:31 PM PDT
by
Delacon
("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
To: Delacon
a new organization that will certify Web sites it finds to be trustworthy and a reliable source of information.Pffftt!
3
posted on
09/21/2008 12:24:58 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
To: Delacon
Sir Tim Berners-Lee is proving once again that British de-Nazification programs really should have been applied to more folks than just Lord Haw Haw.
4
posted on
09/21/2008 12:28:15 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: Delacon; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...

Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
Goes right along with the multitude of conservative websites being hacked at the moment.....
5
posted on
09/21/2008 12:28:34 PM PDT
by
xcamel
(Conservatives start smart, and get rich, liberals start rich, and get stupid.)
To: Delacon
Were talking about the evolution of the Web, Berners-Lee says. When something is such a creative medium as the Web, the limits to it are our imagination. Uh, huh. And the limits proposed by Berners-Lee and his World Wide Web Foundation.
To: Delacon
The internet should be completely free of any regulation.
Period.
7
posted on
09/21/2008 12:37:37 PM PDT
by
Emperor Palpatine
("Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.")
To: Delacon
While I would like to see the WWW clean up it’s act...
Why? Why is the web seen as a homogenous entity which should measure up to some level or standard regarding what is found there? It seems this has become a standard view, and is reflected in many discussions or comments made on the TV (an old outdated and "one way street" information source) regarding the "danger" of "new media" such as blogs. Nobody ever seems to wonder or question why people are assuming that blogs, or anything else of that sort online, should be seen as related in any way to "old media."
The WWW is not a news source or an organization with a reputation to protect. It is like a library, in that it brings together many disparate pieces of information of vastly varying ranges of trustworthiness. It is up to the reader to be careful and avoid credulity, and not the library to impose something like that. In another way the WWW is nothing but the town square, or local tavern, where people meet to exchange ideas and thoughts. It is a massive international conversation really. Can you actually go around certifying conversations, or groups of people who are talking, making sure some of them are "trustworthy?" I doubt it, and why would you want to? That is not what such conversations are about really, and more important is the honesty and openness of the participants.
A healthy web is found the same way healthy relationships and discourses are, and that is not through external measurements and enforced certifications. If we would clear up our understanding of what the WWW is, then we could have a much better way of using it, and being a part of it in a way helpful to ourselves and others.
8
posted on
09/21/2008 12:38:09 PM PDT
by
cothrige
(Ego vero Evangelio non crederem, ni si me catholicae Ecclesiae commoveret auctoritas.)
To: cothrige
9
posted on
09/21/2008 12:41:46 PM PDT
by
Delacon
("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
To: Delacon
“Education is a weapon whose effects depend on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed.” -- Joseph Stalin "Those who cast the votes, they decide nothing. Those who count the votes, they decide everything." -- Joseph Stalin "Who? Whom?" -- Lenin Yes, in deed, who gets to decide, and shall we give this elite body of gatekeepers the usual power of State to enforce their decrees, meaning we would allow them to use deadly force to stop even our elderly grandmothers who might attempt to publish some unapproved opinion?
To: Delacon
World Wide Web Foundation, a new organization that will certify Web sites it finds to be trustworthy and a reliable source of information.Kind of like this?
11
posted on
09/21/2008 1:01:12 PM PDT
by
OCC
To: OCC
Don’t give them any ideas. ;)
12
posted on
09/21/2008 1:06:32 PM PDT
by
Delacon
("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
To: Delacon
Web Trustworthyness-—part of the “change” coming from an Obama Administration.....
...part of the Fairness Doctrine legislation!
13
posted on
09/21/2008 1:19:19 PM PDT
by
Erik Latranyi
(Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
To: Delacon
They can rate to their hearts content as long as they don’t try and regulate it.
14
posted on
09/21/2008 1:30:02 PM PDT
by
yazoo
To: Delacon
I predict that
$cientology sues Berners-Lee repeatedly until they wear him down, win a case and take over his organization, just like they did with the
Cult Awareness Network.
15
posted on
09/21/2008 1:42:03 PM PDT
by
George Smiley
(Palin is the real deal.)
To: Delacon
Sir Tim Berners-Lee is helping to create the World Wide Web Foundation, that will certify Web sites it finds to be trustworthy and a reliable source of information.
And just what is supposed to make me believe Sir Tim's "certification" prowess? He sounds like just another government weenie trying to worm his way into the middle of a situation that in no way whatsoever requires his presence.
And I suppose he will be doing this from the kindness of his heart and there will not be so much as a suggestion of monetary compensation for his "needed" services?
16
posted on
09/21/2008 1:43:41 PM PDT
by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: yazoo
Make no mistake. Berners-Lee, unlike Algore, is the actual inventer of the WWW. He is also the director of the World Wide Web Consortium. The reason you have to put .edu, .com, .biz at the end of any web address is because of these guys. They just said its so. Now Berners-Lee is going outside this organization to push his “legitimate” standard. This isn’t about rating, its about regulation.
17
posted on
09/21/2008 2:09:53 PM PDT
by
Delacon
("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
To: Delacon
“This isnt about rating, its about regulation.”
I understand. I also think it is politically impossible to regulate the web.
18
posted on
09/21/2008 2:31:19 PM PDT
by
yazoo
To: Delacon; PROCON; cogitator; neverdem; steelyourfaith; xcamel; Thunder90
I wonder if the Web Foundation will have a Keepers Of Odd Knowledge rating?
19
posted on
09/21/2008 2:36:18 PM PDT
by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Drill Here! Drill Now! Pay Less! Sign the petition at http://www.americansolutions.com/)
To: yazoo
“I also think it is politically impossible to regulate the web.”
All due respect, have we gotten any chinese nationals posting on FR? Have you found any anti-gov’t chinese websites? Why so?
20
posted on
09/21/2008 3:06:24 PM PDT
by
Delacon
("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson