Posted on 09/16/2008 4:59:56 PM PDT by COBOL2Java
Because to prosecute Barack Obama prior to November 5 would guarantee an electoral victory for his replacement.
He was not waging war against the U.S. and suggesting that his actions gave aid and comfort to the enemy would be a pretty big stretch. Treason is a crime defined in the Constitution and, much as I'd like to see Barack prosecuted for treason, I don't think his crimes quite qualify.
The longer I observe his actions, and see the direction our nation is being taken...all without the input of the citizens...the more it reminds me of Venezuela and that creep dictator that got “elected” and promptly took over the private industries ...gas, farming etc.
I think what is happening is no accident of events....some little group of elitists are in the “back room” pulling the strings all according to their “One World “ plan.....they're just getting the upstart Americans in line...after all, we can't be any better off than the rest of the world....fine, wonder where the countries will go for their handouts when we really are no better off than they.
Is he one of THE ONE’s 300 foreign policy advisors? And, isn’t that the same number that the Spartans had at Thermopolae? I hope they all meet the same end.
I would like to see the AG state that he is waiting until after the election to possibly file charges the way Bin Liden said they would be filing charges against GW and Cheney.
This “O” logo belongs on a toilet seat, don’t you think?
What help could Chuck Hagel be? He’s gonna wind up supporting OBama.
True, but you'd think Hagel would pull the golden child aside and tutor him about the Hatch Act...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.