Posted on 09/15/2008 5:21:16 PM PDT by Kaslin
While we are searching for who to blame, how about those expensive and expansive oversight committees of Congress? Where in the hell have they been? Out to lunch, as usual, too busy with re-election campaigns, increasing their own power and wealth, to spend any quality time on “the people’s business”. Every single one of these political hacks should be dragged from their offices and given some street justice.
If some Congress doesn’t start sending a few of the criminals like Gore lick to Justice for prosecution, the democrat program for racking taxpayer dollars off via graft then taxpayer paying the bill will get much worse. This Republic cannot survive the type of criminal work the clinton era embedded in the taxpayer supported enterprises like Fannie and Freddie.
So, lots of finger pointing is in order, but fingers could be pointed at this corner as well as away from it.
Investigators found that of the $90.12 million Raines was paid in that six-year period, more than $52 million came from EPS bonuses...Gorelick’s situation was similar. OFHEO found that she took home $26.46 million in the period from 1998 to 2002 (she left in that year, so she wasn’t there for the entire period under investigation). Of that figure, nearly $15 million came from EPS bonuses.
Nice.
It has not gotten nearly enough coverage here on FR
Believe it or not, the following Washington Post story lays the blame on the Dems and the Clinton administration (sort of, lol).
Miracles never cease/s.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/13/AR2008091302638.html
Excerpt:
In October 1992, a brief debate unfolded on the floor of the House of Representatives over a bill to create a new regulator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. On one side stood Jim Leach, an Iowa Republican concerned that Congress was “hamstringing” this new regulator at the behest of the companies.
He warned that the two companies were changing “from being agencies of the public at large to money machines for the stockholding few.”
On the other side stood Barney Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat who said the companies served a public purpose. They were in the business of lowering the price of mortgage loans.
Congress chose to create a weak regulator, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight. The agency was required to get its budget approved by Congress, while agencies that regulated banks set their own budgets. That gave congressional allies an easy way to exert pressure.
“Fannie Mae’s lobbyists worked to insure that [the] agency was poorly funded and its budget remained subject to approval in the annual appropriations process,” OFHEO said more than a decade later in a report on Fannie Mae. “The goal of senior management was straightforward: to force OFHEO to rely on the [Fannie] for information and expertise to the degree that Fannie Mae would essentially regulate itself.”
ASSHATS!
Well lets not forget that program Bush endorsed to help minorities buy homes. This also helped the current mess.
bttt......
bttt...
Post HERE
The Democrats have bought the African-Americans off, and are trying to buy everyone else off. It seems everyone voting Democrat have their hands out for something.
The people not working want free money, the pedophiles and homos want more rights and the pacifists want peace at any price.
Actually there has been much coverage of Fannie Mae bonuses and irregular accounting practices. The millions that Raines and Gorelick is astounding.
Gorelick, in particular, seems to be everywhere. The 9/11 commission, Fannie Mae, and more recently the Duke lacrosse lawsuits. She is a big buddy of Steele who just took over at Wachovia. That is very disturbing. Maybe she’ll clean up more millions if Steele takes Wachovia down.
Our leadership from the top down *reeks*.
No, his speech should be about how this country and the world have finally run out of "greater fools", so we should all stop hoping for something for nothing.
Perhaps so, but monkeying with the banking system seems much more egregious. How many taxpayer bailouts happened when the tech bubble burst?
Ah you see, if you were not paying attention, that Greenspan dropped interest rates and started pumping the real estate bubble in order to offset the deflationary effects of the dot com bubble. So, it is all connected together under the whole package of loose monetary policy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.