Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tattletale Pranks and Kindergarten Pursuits
12 September, 2008 | joanie-f

Posted on 09/11/2008 10:57:32 PM PDT by joanie-f

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 341-358 next last
To: narses
And yet you attack the only rational alternative. Sad. Very sad.

Eh, bzzzt, no I didn't. You cornered me into giving my opinion of McCain. I studiously avoided that until you badgered me into giving it. Your reasoning skills are sad. Very sad.

201 posted on 09/13/2008 2:22:05 PM PDT by TigersEye (Buckhead of the Bikini-clad Barracuda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: narses

He is for amnesty, McCain-Faingold, talks and laughs to himself, and needs Joe Lieberman to whisper answers to him. Now he hides behind Sarah. As for pro-life, he is all over the map.


202 posted on 09/13/2008 2:24:40 PM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: nmh; EternalVigilance; betty boop

One step at a time.

The first thing we need to do is reverse Roe v. Wade. That was the decision that led to tens of millions of abortions. It was not only morally wrong from a Christian perspective, or even a human perspective. It was also an act of judicial tyranny that was basically unconstitutional.

Then we are back to the states. MOST states will be opposed to abortion on demand. A few—New York, California—may go the other way. Then we can fight the good fight on the state level.

You can also argue that the real meaning of the word “person” in the Constitution means that abortion is just plain unconstitutional. But first we need to reverse Roe, then we can pursue the fight further.

We also need to start appointing decent judges. That is only going to happen under a Republican administration led by people like George W. Bush or Sarah Palin—or, we can hope, John McCain.

It is a multi-pronged problem, and we should not neglect any avenues that will lead to better results in the future.


203 posted on 09/13/2008 2:45:45 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I have no more patience for murdering babies.

I want abortion banned at the FEDERAL LEVEL.

Stack the U.S.S.C. right. retry Roe/Wade and make it illegal throughout the U.S.. You will never get all the states to go along with banning abortion at the State level and it would take forever to try.

204 posted on 09/13/2008 2:49:42 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
My own view is: Overturn Roe v. Wade and give the authority on the abortion issue back to the states. They have by far the better record on this issue, historically speaking.

The more abortion becomes a “local” and “state” issue, the more it comes under the direct influence of local, highly motivated and politically active defenders of human life.

The radical Left is well aware of this. They deplore it; for it “devolves” power away from “the federal authority,” which is now largely in the hands of ideological elites, back to the people. Which entails greater human liberty and personal responsibility. And that sort of thing cuts against the very grain of the entire radical Left agenda.

Bears consistent, drumbeat repeating.

Thank you, betty, for your always fact-based, intelligent, well-reasoned commentary.

~ joanie

205 posted on 09/13/2008 2:53:15 PM PDT by joanie-f (If you believe that God is your co-pilot, it might be time to switch seats ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

“Eh, bzzzt, no I didn’t”

Yeah ya did.

“You cornered me into giving my opinion of McCain”

I have such power.

“Your reasoning skills are sad. Very sad.”

LOL, that from one who rails against the pro-life candidate.


206 posted on 09/13/2008 2:59:31 PM PDT by narses (...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: narses
LOL, that from one who rails against the pro-life candidate.

In what post?

207 posted on 09/13/2008 3:01:24 PM PDT by TigersEye (Buckhead of the Bikini-clad Barracuda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: apocalypto

So who are you voting for? Keyes? Paul? Obama?


208 posted on 09/13/2008 3:01:27 PM PDT by narses (...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

See 195, or is that not your post?


209 posted on 09/13/2008 3:02:26 PM PDT by narses (...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: narses

That was a reply to your persistent questioning wasn’t it? IOWs I did avoid giving that opinion but you insisted on it. And you got it. Take responsibility for your own actions. You are the one insisting on making McCain’s qualifications a matter of debate on this thread.


210 posted on 09/13/2008 3:07:02 PM PDT by TigersEye (Buckhead of the Bikini-clad Barracuda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f
But where does one draw the line in the ‘there are no degrees of evil’ argument?

"Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father in heaven is perfect."

The fact that we, in our fallen state, struggle mightily against such a seemingly impossible standard, does not change the fact that it IS the standard set by our Lord and Savior.

211 posted on 09/13/2008 3:24:51 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Don't talk about God, Life, Liberty, Borders or the IRS, and you'll do fine in the McCain GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Cicero; nmh; EternalVigilance; betty boop; joanie-f; Alamo-Girl
One step at a time.... The first thing we need to do is reverse Roe v. Wade.... Then we can fight the good fight on the state level.... It is a multi-pronged problem, and we should not neglect any avenues that will lead to better results in the future.

Sounds like a workable plan to me Cicero!

But it seems to assume that Obama will not be the next president of the United States, with a compliant (Democrat) Congress at his beck and call. Just think about the sort of federal judges he would appoint (and the Senate confirm), including to the highest Court in the land — which is the only Court that can overturn Roe v. Wade. 'Nuff said.

Wake up America!!! Then hold your nose if you have to; but support McCain/Palin on Nov. 4th!

Thank you so much for writing!

212 posted on 09/13/2008 3:29:31 PM PDT by betty boop (This country was founded on religious principles. Without God, there is no America. -- Ben Stein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f

Thank you so very much joanie for your kind words!


213 posted on 09/13/2008 3:31:42 PM PDT by betty boop (This country was founded on religious principles. Without God, there is no America. -- Ben Stein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f
If you are interviewing a prospective employee, you are told that you must hire one of two applicants...

Ah. You start with a false premise. In no way "must" I do any such thing. (What do you do if two of your prospective employees are found to have aided and abetted in murder, but that there was a third available who was eminently qualified who had never done any such thing?)

We have, at some personal sacrifice, (including having to endure the kind of scorn you can see exhibited on this thread), made sure that the people of more than thirty-five states will have the opportunity to choose a good candidate who doesn't compromise on our foundational American principles of the protection of innocent human life.

Yours is one. All you have to do is write in "A-L-A-N-K-E-Y-E-S" and your vote will be counted.

You can't rightfully claim that McCain and Obama are your only two choices. We've made sure of that.

214 posted on 09/13/2008 3:33:36 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Don't talk about God, Life, Liberty, Borders or the IRS, and you'll do fine in the McCain GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

I guess we don’t have any ‘specialists’ on this thread today. That’s my way of saying, “I do not know the answer to that question.”


215 posted on 09/13/2008 3:36:07 PM PDT by B4Ranch ("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you"--John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
"Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father in heaven is perfect."

The fact that we, in our fallen state, struggle mightily against such a seemingly impossible standard, does not change the fact that it IS the standard set by our Lord and Savior.

For whom have you voted for President since you were eligible to vote? Did they all walk on water?

216 posted on 09/13/2008 3:36:40 PM PDT by SiliconValleyGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

The first thing you MUST do is establish the principles. Then, no matter the political lay of the land, you cannot sacrifice those principles.

Otherwise, you end up where we are now. Every time.

The false idea that this is a problem only of the courts has run its inevitable course. We will not stop abortion in America until every single officer of the United States is held to the standard of their sworn oath to the Constitution, which clearly protects innocent human life.

But again, no state or individual has a right to alienate what is unalienable.


217 posted on 09/13/2008 3:38:32 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Don't talk about God, Life, Liberty, Borders or the IRS, and you'll do fine in the McCain GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: SiliconValleyGuy

No. I was answering a specific question from my friend about what the true standard is.


218 posted on 09/13/2008 3:39:39 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Don't talk about God, Life, Liberty, Borders or the IRS, and you'll do fine in the McCain GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
No. I was answering a specific question from my friend about what the true standard is.

Then why did you settled for "sub-standard" then, and you are not willing to settle for "sub-standard" now, when the stakes are higher than they have ever been, and the alternative is unthinkable?

219 posted on 09/13/2008 3:43:14 PM PDT by SiliconValleyGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f

I’ll address the rest of your post by simply pointing out that John McCain is horrible not just in the area of defending the unalienable right to life, he is horrid on practically everything else.

As always, life is the best litmus test of all. If a politician gets that one wrong, you can be sure they don’t have the moral courage, brainpower or understanding to figure out the rest of it and consistently fight for what’s right.


220 posted on 09/13/2008 3:46:21 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Don't talk about God, Life, Liberty, Borders or the IRS, and you'll do fine in the McCain GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 341-358 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson