Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paul Statement to the National Press Club(Endorse all 3rd Parties Nader, McKinney, Baldwin and Barr)
Ron Paul's Campaign for Libtardy ^

Posted on 09/10/2008 6:47:54 AM PDT by mnehring

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last
To: Admin Moderator

Mod, can you remove Barr from the title, he didn’t show..


41 posted on 09/10/2008 7:44:38 AM PDT by mnehring (Maverick/Barracuda 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
This can be accomplished by voting for one of the non-establishment principled candidates—Baldwin, Barr, McKinney, Nader, and possibly others. (listed alphabetically)

Gee Mr. Paul, does this include voting for the Communist Party USA, Socialist Party, Socialist Workers' Party, or Worker's World Party? Or maybe the Green Party. So many socialists, and only one vote.

42 posted on 09/10/2008 7:44:54 AM PDT by weegee (Better to support a pitbull in lipstick than to be in a party that is putting lipstick on a pig.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mavsfan
He is a Republican, & has ALREADY WON re-election for his House seat until 2011 (he won the Republican primaries & had no Dim opponent, IIRC).

I'm kinda nostalgic for the days when the Paul haters swore up and down that that turd they ran against him would win in the primary.

43 posted on 09/10/2008 7:45:17 AM PDT by jmc813 (F the Patriots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
It's like the good old days a few months ago isn’t it? Of course we have been proven right. What was it the Paulinati would tell us, he was a man of conviction and principal, just like the founding fathers?

LOL, yeah, riiiight...

Like we often said, political belief are a circle, the far left and the far right are basically connected, kooks all, and the chief kook has spoken for the tribe...

44 posted on 09/10/2008 7:46:04 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (Finally a Conservative on the RNC ticket....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
I see how you are narrowing it down now to just the 'new deal commerce clause'..

That's been the primary means by which the federal government has expanded it's authority since the New Deal. There's no shortage of examples, and they're objectively identifible by virtue of Congress claiming authority because they "find" a "substantial effect on interstate commerce". If you have other examples you'd like to include please do.

however, before I answer, I will also pose the same question back to you.. what has Paul accomplished in his decades in offce to limit the 'new deal commerce clause'?

You've already submitted that he's done nothing, and they you have better alternatives. Now, who are they and what is it exactly they have actually done?

45 posted on 09/10/2008 7:46:06 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
If he is running unopposed, he should take his own advice and run as an independent, not as a Republican.

But this way, he gets funds donated by GOP lackeys who donate directly to the party rather than individual candidates and it pisses said people off. I like it.

46 posted on 09/10/2008 7:46:46 AM PDT by jmc813 (F the Patriots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
Who is it, and what have they done to limit federal authority under the New Deal Commerce Clause?

Palin hasn't had a chance to yet, but I bet she will. She's pretty darned libertarian.

47 posted on 09/10/2008 7:47:41 AM PDT by jmc813 (F the Patriots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

That ‘turd’ we ran against him did better against Paul than Paul did in all of his primary bids.

How is it when Paul gets over 5%, it is a moral victory and proof of a movement, but when someone running against Paul gets 30%, Paul ‘trounced him’?


48 posted on 09/10/2008 7:47:46 AM PDT by mnehring (Maverick/Barracuda 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
How is it when Paul gets over 5%, it is a moral victory and proof of a movement, but when someone running against Paul gets 30%, Paul ‘trounced him’?

Because there were 8 people in the presidential primary and two people in the Congressional primary. Even you have to admit that you guys bit the big one predicting that dude to actually win.

49 posted on 09/10/2008 7:50:32 AM PDT by jmc813 (F the Patriots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
But this way, he gets funds donated by GOP lackeys who donate directly to the party rather than individual candidates and it pisses said people off. I like it.

Being the freerider always makes economic sense for the freerider.

But for someone who claims to be a man of principle, it kind of explodes the claim. And when I say "kind of", I mean "utterly."

50 posted on 09/10/2008 7:51:25 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who like to be called Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: jmc813; tacticalogic

Y’all may find this interesting.. Barr (Libertarian) didn’t show up.. I just got an email, apparently he is having his own press conference at noon. He isn’t happy with setting aside ideals and embracing Nader and McKinney for a statement.

It seems Barr is true to what he said, he wants to win, not just make a statement.


51 posted on 09/10/2008 7:52:21 AM PDT by mnehring (Maverick/Barracuda 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

I’m surprized we haven’t seen more of this. Ron Paul is a joke even in the Texas palmetto swamps where he lives. He ran on promoting the return of the gold standard for years. He appeals to those who don’t know we are on the gold standard, at market rates.

The media may try to promote Paul as a spoiler, siphoning off fringe conservatives.

The equivalent response to Ron Paul is to promote Ralph Nader’s campaign: “Real liberals for Nader!”


52 posted on 09/10/2008 7:52:22 AM PDT by Bertram3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #53 Removed by Moderator

Comment #54 Removed by Moderator

To: mnehrling
He isn’t happy with setting aside ideals

Then why did he jump on the global warming bandwagon? He's as much of a jackass as the other third-party guys.

55 posted on 09/10/2008 7:53:58 AM PDT by jmc813 (F the Patriots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

Who knows.. you know I’m not a Barr fan, I just found the turn interesting.. even he didn’t buy this little symbolic move..


56 posted on 09/10/2008 7:55:33 AM PDT by mnehring (Maverick/Barracuda 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
But this way, he gets funds donated by GOP lackeys who donate directly to the party rather than individual candidates and it pisses said people off. I like it.

You just admitted he's a cash whore who uses people for his own aggrandizement, and you're happy with that. Thanks for the admission. Nice people you run with...

57 posted on 09/10/2008 7:55:34 AM PDT by bcsco (Sarah America! Ignore the lipstik at your peril!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Ron Paul has officially just actively betrayed all the people who have supported his run for the presidency. While many of us have made light of them, their attachment to him has run deep. I guess the cut runs just as deep.


58 posted on 09/10/2008 7:57:14 AM PDT by steve8714 (Sarah was picked for the base. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
You just admitted he's a cash whore who uses people for his own aggrandizement, and you're happy with that.

Yeah, because the people who donate to political parties rather than candidates tend to be the type of people I enjoy watching get pissed and used. Call me cynical or vindictive in this case, I can assure you that I'm not like that in my non-political life. I just can't stand party lackeys of either party.

59 posted on 09/10/2008 7:58:27 AM PDT by jmc813 (F the Patriots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Palin hasn't had a chance to yet, but I bet she will. She's pretty darned libertarian.

this isn't a matter of "libertarian" as it is "strict construtionist". A lot of people would argue that Roe v Wade was a "libertarian" decision, but it was still an abuse of authority.

60 posted on 09/10/2008 7:59:16 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson