Are we mad? Every organ of the state now seems intent on protecting those who would destroy us

Daily Mail (UK) ^ | 03rd September 2008 | Ruth Dudley Edwards

[Free State Four]

or does it appear that his forehead is concave?

Labotomy would be my guess. Also, I think he is hiding a pack of cigarettes in that pajama pocket.

[Desron13]

"Also, I think he is hiding a pack of cigarettes in that pajama pocket."

Good point, but it could as easily be an emergency Jihadi pack of C4. "Don't leave the Mosque without it." I just got distracted by the oily black growth he is apparently sporting as a beard. It looks more like some sort of petrochemical experiment gone wrong.

[NonValueAdded]

If Islamic terrorists and their supporters were looking for a safe haven during the so-called 'war against terror', why on earth would they bother with some dusty cave in Afghanistan, a squalid street in Iran or a dangerous suburb of Baghdad?

worth repeating and pondering.

[fella]

Now that their real citizens are disarmed they are at the mercy of liberal tyrants. It's curious and a shame to watch such a great culture commit suicide by election.

[Winniesboy]

Hmm...rather than this, it’s more accurate to say that Peel and his successors insisted on an unarmed police to make it clear that they were a locally accountable civilian force, to be fundamentally distinguished from the police of the European continent: who were, by contrast, unambiguously instruments of state control integrated with the military structure, and inevitably armed in consequence.

[rrrod]

Winston Churchill, standing up to daily bombings, Dunkirk, D-day and so much more are now just a faint memory and fading fast.

[Mercia]

probably not.