Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drudge: US WEEKLY MAG CASTS IT VOTE EARLY...(graphic display of MSM bias- Us Weekly)
Drudge Report Front Page ^ | 9-3-08

Posted on 09/03/2008 8:33:27 AM PDT by STARWISE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-131 next last
To: Bulwinkle

Seems as though there are more pinkos at RunnerWorld than I thought. I love to try to follow the libs lack of logic. Kind of like a game to me.


61 posted on 09/03/2008 9:16:45 AM PDT by stratboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

“Didn’t know you could do that.”

You can block any or most channels on the Dish and Direct Tv satellite systems and Comcast with your remote.

Some Freepers say that these providers don’t know when you do this.

However, a young woman, who was like our daughter and sister to our sons was a pr damage handler. She said the providers are very aware of channel blocking by the end consumers.


62 posted on 09/03/2008 9:17:18 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Snowbami, the Oreo Bozo, wants special-ed treatment as an untouchable affirmative action candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

The Obama (The Fraud) cover should say, “His cocaine Use”, “His close relationship with a confessed terrorist”, “His affiliation with a racist white hating church” , his involvement with a convicted slumlord ,and on and on. How unfair can you get?

Since everything is so personal now, I have to say this. If I hear one more person describe his wife as beautiful, I think I will vomit. This is truly a case of beauty being in the eye of the beholder.


63 posted on 09/03/2008 9:17:23 AM PDT by curth (For Americans who love America - McCain/Palin '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

Good Lord!!

Not sure whether to laugh or lock and load...LOL


64 posted on 09/03/2008 9:17:43 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

Right you are. Why they keep Juan on the air is beyond me.


65 posted on 09/03/2008 9:17:47 AM PDT by 4yearlurker (Any day above ground is a good day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Carling
Also, the abuser/ex-husband was not fired.

Exactly and I don't remember anyone on TV saying so. Have they not done their homework?

66 posted on 09/03/2008 9:18:03 AM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
Her argument was that Sarah being scrutinized far more than men would ever be. No contest with that.

People can argue over a specific point here or there being sexist, but I really don't view this as a sexism problem. It's power hunger at all costs, pure and simple. Had this been Romney or Cantor or Huckabee, we'd still be fighting off the media hacks, still fighting off the smears, and maybe even still comparing two hopelessly biased Us magazine covers. :-) It's just the details of the attacks (He's a Jew... he's a flip flopper... he's a Mormon... he's a Christian!) would be different.

67 posted on 09/03/2008 9:18:13 AM PDT by impeachedrapist (On Free Republic PBD [political bipolar disorder] rules!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: stratboy; google; All

The blogosphere is on fire over this story:

Google blog search: Us Weekly

http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=t&q=US+WEEKLY&sa=N&start=10

Hi google .. that was an error, but there you are ... ;)


68 posted on 09/03/2008 9:19:16 AM PDT by STARWISE (They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

Yep .. he’s hedging his bets and comments.


69 posted on 09/03/2008 9:21:03 AM PDT by STARWISE (They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Listening now to Rush. Just talked to a lady at P&G about their advertising in such a sleeze corrupt magazine like US WEEKLY. She said I was her first caller...LOL...told her to call in extra people to man the phones because there was a tsunami of outrage headed their way...LOL

Get to calling folks!!


70 posted on 09/03/2008 9:21:29 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Here is the publisher of US who left his wife and kids for this boy 13 years ago:


71 posted on 09/03/2008 9:21:37 AM PDT by wardaddy (Obama/Pol Pot 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Thanks for the ping! Jeepers...


72 posted on 09/03/2008 9:22:10 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Thanks- just tuning in to Rush now.

There’s something going on here that’s unlike previous campaigns.


73 posted on 09/03/2008 9:22:52 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet-McCain/Palin 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

My wife and I passed the Wal-Mart magazine rack a couple of weeks ago. I stopped and asked her “what’s missing here,” while gesturing toward the section of the rack with mainly women’s magazines.

After looking for a moment, she said she wasn’t sure.

“No Cindy McCain. Four covers with Michelle Obama, not one with Cindy McCain.”

If Cindy were ugly, that would be one thing...but she isn’t, and her personal story is at least as compelling as the wife of the commmunity organizer.


74 posted on 09/03/2008 9:23:36 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (*******It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.******)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

to be honest you sort of expect this from The Enquirer and I have seen them go after Obama a bit too.

one cover was about drug use, the other about sexual stuff and his relationship with Michelle.

it nevers ends with them...salacious headlines abolstered by innuendo inside

they figure they’ll sell enough copies to pay any judgement anyhow


75 posted on 09/03/2008 9:24:50 AM PDT by wardaddy (Obama/Pol Pot 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

Morning, Miss Didi...

Kinda makes you wonder if the reason they went after the Breck Girl was to give them cover to go after Governor Palin? I know that the Edwards thing was around longer than she has been the VP nominee, but it’s a thought I have.

What do you think?


76 posted on 09/03/2008 9:25:38 AM PDT by Christian4Bush (No way, No how, NObama! *************McCain/Palin 08************)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I think that the kind of people who buy a magazine like US are probably too stupid to know what they are doing in a voting booth. At least the magazine put a decent enough picture of Sarah Palin on the cover. But notice how they lightened the Obamas?


77 posted on 09/03/2008 9:26:05 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

What you are seeing is a response from a media dominated by folks who fear Mrs. Palin.

Liberal blacks.

Feminist zombies.

Apostate Good Works Christians.

Homosexuals.

Leftist Jews.

All disporportionately represented in ALL media in our culture.....especially homosexuals.


78 posted on 09/03/2008 9:26:49 AM PDT by wardaddy (Obama/Pol Pot 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

“Here is the publisher of US who left his wife and kids for this boy 13 years ago:”

OMG..should have guessed as much...(eye roll)


79 posted on 09/03/2008 9:33:00 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Christian4Bush; wardaddy
The Enquirer stories on Barry were scandalous but got no mention, except by the ladies in the beauty parlor. Then the Enquirer exposed John Edwards and it gained some respect which has me worried. I don't think they ever expected a Sarah Palin for VP.

Rush is playing clips of Sally Quinn saying that Sarah is not the true subservient Christian playing wife and mother. Rush is blasting the Drive-Bys about not exposing the Breck Girl. And Nancy Pelosi has children and grandkids and even brought them to the swearing in and said it was time for a woman in the House.
80 posted on 09/03/2008 9:40:47 AM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson